On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 5:59 PM AV via test
wrote:
> I have been trying out fedora 40 beta on a Dell XPS 15 9500 with
> integrated Intel UHD graphics and discrete Nvidia graphics.
> Everything worked perfectly with the 6.8.1 kernel and using nouveau
> but things started to happen after the
On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 12:06 AM John Lynch
wrote:
> Since upgrading from 39 to 40, when I issue a command in the Terminal,
> sometimes I have to wait for the character to be displayed. If I press
> another key, then the previous character shows up, but it continues thus.
> I am running an
> Latest update seems to have fixed it.
That's interesting. It shouldn't be in Fedora yet. I have a Fedora bug
filed here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268998
and the upstream issue is here:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/3332
The fix was only merged yesterday
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:39 PM Petra Mikova wrote:
> Can you please tell us how to proceed to get this change pushed to
> stable? There was a deadline set for our changes to be pushed today
> (Wednesday), so please let us know if we have to do some additional
> steps to ensure the update makes
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 1:30 PM wrote:
>
> Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
> for Fedora 40 Branched 20240216.n.0.
HEADS UP
cockpit-311-1.fc40 landed yesterday, but anaconda-webui-6-1.fc40
landed only today, which means the F40 Workstation image
That sounds like this Common Issue:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/its-difficult-to-reformat-a-btrfs-partition-subvolume-in-the-installer/89052
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 2:29 PM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
> As usual, the Fedora QA team will hangout at #fedora-test-...@libera.chat
> for questions and discussion.
>
Will we? The wiki page says "Matrix: #test-day:fedoraproject.org". At the
same time, it says "You can chat with us on IRC" [1].
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:00 AM Rick Marshall wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Since the F39 update pppd is broken (perhaps not in all cases but the
> config needs to be changed and it's not obvious).
>
Please file a bug in RH Bugzilla and post the link here, thanks.
--
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 7:26 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I suppose also you could make a new account and try with it to confirm
> you get the agreement and things work with it?
>
Also make sure to disable any extensions like adblockers etc, which might
interfere with it.
--
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 10:03 PM pmkellly wrote:
> What is the recommended client?
>
>
I can recommend the browser-based Element [1], it works well. And I think
it's also the client recommended by default.
[1] https://app.element.io
--
___
test
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 9:19 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Hey folks! I just wanted to give a heads up - I've removed the
> installer help criterion from the Final release criteria:
>
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_40_Final_Release_Criteria=695349=695347
>
> why? well, the
On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 3:11 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Greetings testers! It's time for another QA meeting.
>
Sorry, can't attend today.
> == Proposed Agenda Topics ==
>
> 1. Previous meeting follow-up
> 2. Fedora 40 check-in and Change review
> 3. Communications overhaul: Discourse and
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 10:32 AM Miroslav Vadkerti
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 4:16 PM Miroslav Vadkerti
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Fedora CI is very well alive! We will be sending out bi-weekly updates
>> like this one about some of our plans, interesting information and status
>> updates.
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 7:25 PM Niccolò Zuccolo wrote:
> Hello Fedora QA Team Members,
>
> My name is Niccolo' and it is my pleasure to introduce myself as a new
> member interested in contributing to your Quality Assurance team. Fedora is
> a community and project that I have long admired, and
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 5:31 AM Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I start the Live OS of F39
> (Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-39_Beta-1.1.iso) on a system that requires
> a display orientation of "Portrait Right".
> As soon as I change the display orientation, the mouse stops working.
>
It works
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 6:55 PM camiro pan wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> i run fedora 38 on my dell xps 9300 and want to install Fedora 39
> beta/nightly.
> When i boot from a Fedora 39 (nightly) boot device i get the error
> message:
> "[Failed] Failed to start udisks2.service - Disk Manager".
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 7:37 PM Osama Albahrani via test <
test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I wanted to test Fedora Rawhide so I ran `dnf system-upgrade download
> --releasever rawhide --exclude=sdubby` (as per
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243872#c12) to upgrade
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 1:23 PM Osama Albahrani via test <
test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi Kamil,
>
> I have an intel-based MacBook Pro (2017). I tried the iso the other day
> and submitted the following bugzilla for it:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243144
>
I see
It would be great if somebody could test Fedora 39 dual boot on a macOS
device, because our internal team currently doesn't have hardware to do so.
It needs to be an older x86_64 Mac (Macbook, Mac Mini, etc), the newer
M-based Macs are not yet supported by Fedora.
Is here anyone who has access to
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:06 AM Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> I noticed that we switched off updates-testing by default for F39
> installs very recently. Is that something that is tied to the release
> date or the final freeze date?
>
There's no exact time defined, but usually this happens shortly
-- Forwarded message -
From: Adam Williamson
Date: Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 1:50 AM
Subject: [Test-Announce] Please help complete validation testing for
current Fedora 39 candidate nightly!
To:
Hey folks! You probably saw the mail "Fedora 39 Branched 20231010.n.0
nightly compose
> When install Fedora Robotics in virtualbox 7.0.10， after start Fedora
> Robotics， top left corner is a white cube， then install into disk，chinese
> version， reboot again，top left corner is a white cube as before。
Yes, GNOME changed it. It no longer says Activities, it shows
workspaces. The
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 7:23 PM Alexander Sosedkin
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > It might be good to go through all the ones that were hit by this (it
> > wasn't just chrome) and indicate if they are now fixed.
> > You can see a partial list in the common bug:
Does it work for you if you boot it using libvirt (e.g. virt-manager /
gnome-boxes / cockpit)?
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
You shouldn't run this with sudo, just as a regular user. What do you get
if you run
$ gsettings get org.gnome.mutter experimental-features
?
Here's how it should work:
$ gsettings get org.gnome.mutter experimental-features
['scale-monitor-framebuffer']
$ gsettings set org.gnome.mutter
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 1:30 PM Neil Chetty
wrote:
> I recelty upgraded from F38 to F39. In F38 i was using default settings
> for display which is 2880x1800(16:10), 90hz,200% scaling. AFter upgrading
> to F39 when scaling is set to 200 percent texts are blurry in apps except
> system apps and
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 5:22 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> updates-testing is not enabled by default for the upgrade.
>
> The upgrade process uses whatever repos are enabled *in the current
> configuration*. So in the "typical" case, you are upgrading from a
> stable Fedora release with default
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 2:05 PM Frantisek Zatloukal
wrote:
> The added work for a FE seems pretty minimal to me (3 people write +1, I
> push it to the accepted FE in about a minute), not sure if the releng
> perspective is different here though?
>
I see it a bit differently. Even when just
Lately we've seen a surge of FTI (fails to install) bugs being proposed as
freeze exceptions [1] [2]. We generally grant them, because we want the
base repo to be in a consistent and buildable state. However, I wonder,
isn't this approach mostly relevant for the Final release? Does it make
sense
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 6:37 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
> [2]
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Base_test_matrix=687376
> [3]
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Base_test_matrix=687377
I tweaked the ordering a bit to make sure Basic test cases are
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 8:09 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2023-08-21
> # Time: 15:00 UTC
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
> # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
>
> Greetings testers! Once again it's been a bit of
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 5:39 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As most of you might know, with each new release of Fedora, we get a
> new GNOME and that means this is the time to test GNOME 45's new
> features. GNOME 45 test week begins today. During the course of next
> week, we will
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 5:39 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As most of you might know, with each new release of Fedora, we get a
> new GNOME and that means this is the time to test GNOME 45's new
> features. GNOME 45 test week begins today. During the course of next
> week, we will
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 5:39 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As most of you might know, with each new release of Fedora, we get a
> new GNOME and that means this is the time to test GNOME 45's new
> features. GNOME 45 test week begins today. During the course of next
> week, we will
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:20 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> based on this (
> https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/c/38890fd54281a3dc2dd64439de8955637ca6f2a7?branch=main),
> I am proposing to put the Modularity tests on hold for some time (modular
> features are currently not supported in DNF5
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:21 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
> Thanks a lot Kamil and Adamw!!
> Can I go and publish this under the Beta criteria? :)
> @Kamil Paral it will be awesome, if you can point me
> to the correct criteria template , please?
>
Thumbs up from me. Here'
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:27 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 18:28 +0200, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hey folks! So, as per https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3011 , we plan to
> > enable gating of Rawhide updates on openQA test results on Wednesday.
>
> This is now enabled! Please
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 12:07 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> ~
> For any release-blocking deliverable whose default deployment includes
> Toolbx, the {{command|toolbox}} CLI must be able to list existing
> containers.
One nitpick, it's not clear whether "list" means listing
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 12:10 AM Ian Laurie via test <
test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 6/15/23 00:15, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >> Is this option being added or is this a bug?
> >>
> >
> > seems related with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501804
No, that bug is only related
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 7:07 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
> FESCo has approved[0] this changeset and now the criterion needs to be in
> place. I will gather all the knowledge and the corrections that have been
> talked about in this thread and start a fresh one for voting?
>
> [0]
On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 2:43 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> We cannot ship anything from Flathub because
> FESCo will not allow it. I don't *like* this FESCo requirement, but I
> also don't expect that to change.
I haven't studied that ruling, but perhaps the assumption was that said
software is
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 10:32 AM Ian Laurie wrote:
> I was under the impression DNF5 was being held of until F39?
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-b3c645d401
"dnf5" is a separate package from "dnf" (version 4 in F38). It's already in
stable repos, and you can install it
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 6:39 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
> Adam & Kamil, since my criteria starts with"for each release-blocking
> artifact", do you folks think its a good idea to site the criterion? or at
> least have it? I am not able to find it as well.
>
You mean "cite", right? :-) Cite
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 4:48 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
> The revised criterion I have now stands as:
>
>
> For any release-blocking deliverable whose default deployment includes
> toolbx, the toolbox CLI must be able to list existing containers,
>
toolbx -> Toolbx
to denote you're
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 4:48 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
> Debarshi and I decided to re-write the whole thing as a changeset[0].
>
Great, I think this is the best approach.
> The revised criterion I have now stands as:
>
Does it make sense to wait for the FESCo approval before we finalize
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:10 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
> Hi Fedora users, developers, and friends!
>
> It's time to start thinking about Test Days for Fedora 39.
>
Neal Gompa asked for a popular third-party apps test day recently:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 4:21 AM Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> * An absurd assumption that everyone is new to the Internet, leading to
> lots
> of ridiculous gamified spam "achievements" for basic things such as
> replying
> to a thread, with which you get
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:39 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> Is there a way we can add regular testing for it without making it a
> blocker then?
>
For popular third-party software, I think this testing occurs quite
naturally - people just use it. E.g. Steam, Chrome, VSCode, etc. I've been
running
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:21 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
> I propose that we transition devel list, and eventually most of our
> mailing lists, to Fedora Discussion (our Discourse-powered forum).
>
I've spent more than a decade perfecting my email filters and I have a
setup that works for me very
>
> ~
> For any release-blocking deliverable whose default deployment includes
> toolbox, it must be
> possible to list existing containers, enter them, and create a new one.
>
>
> Footnote - "What does this cover?":
> Toolbox
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 5:57 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
> There is a push from the
> Dekstop team to have toolbox as a default app in the installer iso as
> well.
The 'toolbox' package is already installed by default. Or do you mean some
related GUI app?
>
> Toolbox aka Toolbx
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 10:28 AM Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> > I didn't mention this in time to even discuss whether it'd make a good
> > addition to the release notes, but I think users will be happy to see
> > that Fedora 38 Workstation boots faster and uses less baseline memory
> > (measured
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 1:54 AM George R Goffe via test <
test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> To get rc.local running you used to be able to put the file in /etc/rc.d
> and then reboot.
>
> This has worked for quite some time but does not any more. This situation
> has been
On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 8:11 AM Robin A. Meade
wrote:
> I'm having trouble with the *Copy as HTML* menu item in GnomeTerminal in
> Fedora 38 beta.
>
> When I paste the result into a Google doc, the result is HTML code.
>
> When I paste the result into a Libre Office Writer doc, the result is an
>
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 6:05 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-04-04 at 15:21 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 5:34 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> > > At today's QA meeting, nobody had any further objections. If there's no
> > > addit
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 5:34 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> At today's QA meeting, nobody had any further objections. If there's no
> additional feedback, I'll push it live tomorrow.
>
This is now live:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Basic_Release_Criteria=revision=673055=650
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 8:57 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> Here's a second draft. I took feedback here and also from the QA meeting
> [1]. The split between the milestones makes this harder to read and
> compare. If you have better ideas on how to do it, please tell me :-)
>
>
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 5:12 PM Jonathan Wright via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I've grabbed this package. I'll keep an eye on the GH issue and get an
> update released once upstream releases patches/updates for the kernel
> issues.
>
Thanks, Jonathan. I was a happy hstr
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 1:50 AM old sixpack13 wrote:
> dnf remove kernel-core
>
> doesn't remove the directory for that kernel under /lib/modules/
>
Please report a bug against kernel here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
The kernel maintainers are not watching this list. Thanks.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467547
Kamil Paral changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Ever confirmed|0
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 8:20 AM Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> Panu wrote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170878#c126 :
>
> > To me the key points here are
> > 1) there's a lot of obsolete/broken crypto out there
> > 2) we need better error messages
> >
> > Properly dealing with 2) needs
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 8:20 AM Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> Panu wrote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170878#c126 :
>
> > To me the key points here are
> > 1) there's a lot of obsolete/broken crypto out there
> > 2) we need better error messages
> >
> > Properly dealing with 2) needs
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 6:23 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> # F37 Blocker Review meeting
> # Date: 2023-03-27
> # Time: **16:00** UTC
> # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
>
I added this to Fedocal and it shows up at https://qa.fedoraproject.org/
now :-)
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 1:17 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
>
>
> On 3/22/23 03:57, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Here's a second draft. I took feedback here and also from the QA meeting
> > [1]. The split between the milestones makes this harder to read and
> > compar
Here's a second draft. I took feedback here and also from the QA meeting
[1]. The split between the milestones makes this harder to read and
compare. If you have better ideas on how to do it, please tell me :-)
== Basic milestone ==
For each release-blocking desktop, the desktop
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 1:59 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 5:48 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> > The desktop environment must work correctly when displaying common
> application content - that includes regular application windows, video
> output, games and
Related to a recently proposed blocker [1][2], I propose a new release
criterion which would cover such cases. Here it is:
The desktop environment must work correctly when displaying common
application content - that includes regular application windows, video
output, games and
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 10:14 AM Peter Robinson
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 2:20 PM Frantisek Zatloukal
> wrote:
>
>> But that's microdnf, not the current default dnf. I don't think microdnf
>> was used by default in any of our blocking spins/images.
>>
>
> We ship microdnf in the arm
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 2:19 AM wang_chen
wrote:
> dnf install -y java-latest-openjdk.x86_64 java-latest-openjdk-devel.x86_64
> java-latest-openjdk-headless.x86_64
>
> 错误：事务测试失败：
> file /usr/lib/.build-id/4e/d857f31670d36b42e0e4e7cc60da99c9e598da from
> install of
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 2:28 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
> So, I am thinking when the
> test day/week are over. How about then we add the date and pass it through
> the testdays CLI tool.
>
This would be a solution if we don't want to adjust our tooling. The wiki
pages can be created like
For the record, it was me who nudged Sumantro to send this proposal. It's
my understanding that having the date in the title discourages Sumantro (or
anyone handling it) from creating the wiki page too soon, before the page
is really settled. It makes sense, because any date change (and sometimes
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:56 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> this issue definitely should go to the common bugs , IMO.
>
See the link that I posted ;)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:39 AM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [Resending here, because the test list doesn't allow me to post, there]
>
> on f38, I am unable to install any locally built package (signed with a
> local key, I have been using for many years):
>
> # rpm -U
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 5:20 PM Luna Jernberg wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Did vote some today, was not the Blockers meetings supposed to start
> today? or did i got that wrong and they are starting up later this
> cycle?
>
Adam wasn't available today and nobody else decided to run it. It'll happen
next
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 9:48 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
> But, I think it's time to move on. We have ostree and various
> container-delta approaches. We should focus on those — and give DeltaRPMs a
> sad, fond farewell.
>
+1 from me. It will speed up the compose, and I haven't seen a positive
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:27 PM Scott Beamer
wrote:
> I filed a bug report today.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com//show_bug.cgi?id=2172291
But you haven't replied to my question, nor did you provide necessary
details in the bug report. At least "journalctl -b" and "lspci -nn" output
should be
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 4:09 PM Scott Beamer
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I did a fresh install of Fedora 38 on 19 February from the latest Live
> images (both Workstation and KDE Spin).
>
> Workstation install lists no option for either X11 or Wayland. Default
> GNOME selection lands you in a
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:55 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> Our current macOS (still called OS X) dual boot criterion says:
>
> "The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an
> existing OS X installation, install and configure a bootloader that will
> boo
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 7:31 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I am not sure 100% of intel macs are supported either however.
> I have a macbook here with the touchbar thing and last I tried it,
> fedora will boot, but the keyboard doesn't work at all. That was like a
> year or so ago tho, so I should try
Our current macOS (still called OS X) dual boot criterion says:
"The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an
existing OS X installation, install and configure a bootloader that will
boot Fedora."
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Final_Release_Criteria#OS_X_dual_boot
-- Forwarded message -
From: Adam Williamson
Date: Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 1:29 AM
Subject: [Test-Announce] Heads up: testing requested for significant
PackageKit update
To:
Hey folks!
The desktop team kindly let us know that there's a fairly significant
PackageKit update coming.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 5:26 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> One thing I don't see addressed here is how this would impact the release
> criteria. Would it? If so, now's the time to start coordinating with the QA
> team to make those changes.
>
I think we're mostly concerned with the default experience,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 2:37 PM DJ Chase wrote:
> Providing nonfree packages out of the box ultimately promotes the use of
> that nonfree software, which violates this foundation.
>
It's not out of the box. You have to *opt-in* to third-party repos (which
already contain Steam, Nvidia binary
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:22 PM Neal Becker wrote:
> The one concern I have with this proposal is it says that flatpak version
> would only be offered if it didn't duplicate a package in fedora.
>
Citation needed. Do you mean this sentence?
> Where there are overlaps, Fedora content will be
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 7:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> # Adjust GNOME Software so that it uses the following priority order
> when deciding which package to offer by default:
> ## Fedora Flatpaks
> ## RPMs
> ## Flathub Flatpaks
>
Thanks for this. That was my concern last time. With my QA hat on, I
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 2:44 AM Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Flathub carries programs like VLC, mpv, yt-dlp, bundled versions of
> ffmpeg and so on. Why is it ok now to get these from flathub, but not
> from RPM Fusion?
>
I guess the difference could be between a
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 6:46 PM Vojtech Trefny wrote:
> Hi, I am planning to change how we support BIOS RAID (sometimes also
> called Firmware or Fake RAID) in the installer in the future. I plan
> to go through the official Fedora change process for Fedora 38, but
> I'd like to get some
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 6:34 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Well, the point of the asterisk is to make it so you can just copy-and-
> paste and run the command and it will find whatever (assumed single)
> CHECKSUM file is present - it saves the user having to manually modify
> the command.
>
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:18 AM AV via test
wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-11-19 at 19:33 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 11/18/22 16:11, AV via test wrote:
> > > Following info on https://getfedora.org/en/security/
> > >
> > > gpgv --keyring ./fedora.gpg *-CHECKSUM
> > > gpgv: not a detached signature
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:34 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> We currently don't use the initial-setup application in the main KDE
> Spin and Kinoite installation ISOs as everything gets configured at
> installation time via Anaconda.
While that's true, wouldn't it make sense to adjust Anaconda to
Hello,
kernel 6.1 or 6.2 will change how laptop backlight is handled and it might
negatively affect some laptops, especially older ones. Hans De Goede, the
developer of that change, asks for wider community testing. Here are his
blog posts containing all necessary instructions:
* Part 1:
Hello,
kernel 6.1 or 6.2 will change how laptop backlight is handled and it might
negatively affect some laptops, especially older ones. Hans De Goede, the
developer of that change, asks for wider community testing. Here are his
blog posts containing all necessary instructions:
* Part 1:
Hello,
kernel 6.1 or 6.2 will change how laptop backlight is handled and it might
negatively affect some laptops, especially older ones. Hans De Goede, the
developer of that change, asks for wider community testing. Here are his
blog posts containing all necessary instructions:
* Part 1:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 6:54 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> # F37 Blocker Review meeting
> # Date: 2022-11-07
> # Time: **15:00** UTC
>
I think this should be 17:00 UTC. That's what Fedocal shows for the
meeting, and what looks like the appropriate time in my own calendar.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 2:49 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Anyway, it seems a bit silly that we still notionally schedule a
> meeting every week but I almost always cancel half of them. So I'm
> proposing we make it official that we only meet every *other* week.
> This would save sending out
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 10:38 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Ack, I was going to propose the same change. I've tweaked it slightly
> to use brackets instead of dashes, though, as that's what we use
> elsewhere in the page.
>
Fine by me. But I don't think we have a consistent style :
Just a heads up that I updated the Install matrix and extended the Basic
Video Driver testcase coverage. This is because the basic video driver is a
frequent cause of problems, and the limited coverage could often overlook
issues, like our latest proposed blocker:
KDE Live can be installed without creating a regular user, only root. All
you need to do is to not create a regular user in anaconda (only root), and
then not create a regular user in the first boot utility (just click
Finish). In SSDM, it is then possible to log in using the root account (not
a
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:43 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> There should be new options for resetting the persistent overlay and
> booting with no persistence. The default options should boot with
> persistence and setup of persistence should work.
>
Neal, Matt, what is the rationale for enabling
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 9:29 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> We will evaluate the following nominated bugs:
>
> * [abrt] gnome-shell: clutter_actor_destroy_all_children():
> gnome-shell killed by SIGABRT
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127826
I just closed this one.
>
> * Systemd
1 - 100 of 2017 matches
Mail list logo
