[clang] [clang][CodeGen] Propagate pragma set fast-math flags to floating point builtins (PR #90377)

karka228 wrote: > LGTM. Thanks. I will close the issue #87758. Thanks @andykaylor and @zahiraam for reviewing. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90377 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org

[clang] [clang][CodeGen] Propagate pragma set fast-math flags to floating point builtins (PR #90377)

https://github.com/karka228 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90377 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [clang][CodeGen] Propagate pragma set fast-math flags to floating point builtins (PR #90377)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90377 >From 80836f51573c8ba474a0b5d5890a489d5f0c7034 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:04:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Pre-commit reproducer for fast-math flags on calls

[clang] [clang][CodeGen] Propagate pragma set fast-math flags to floating point builtins (PR #90377)

@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s + +// precise mode +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -fmath-errno -ffp-contract=on \ +// RUN: -fno-rounding-math -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck \ +// RUN:

[clang] [clang][CodeGen] Propagate pragma set fast-math flags to floating point builtins (PR #90377)

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -O3 -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - %s | FileCheck %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -O3 -fmath-errno -ffp-contract=on

[clang] [clang][CodeGen] Propagate pragma set fast-math flags to floating point builtins (PR #90377)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90377 >From 80836f51573c8ba474a0b5d5890a489d5f0c7034 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:04:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Pre-commit reproducer for fast-math flags on calls

[clang] [clang][CodeGen] Propagate pragma set fast-math flags to floating point builtins (PR #90377)

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 4 +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -O3 -emit-llvm -o - %s \ +// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK %s + +// Reproducer for issue #87758 +// The

[clang] [clang][CodeGen] Propagate pragma set fast-math flags to floating point builtins (PR #90377)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90377 >From 80836f51573c8ba474a0b5d5890a489d5f0c7034 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:04:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Pre-commit reproducer for fast-math flags on calls

[clang] [clang][CodeGen] Propagate pragma set fast-math flags to floating point builtins (PR #90377)

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 4 +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -O3 -emit-llvm -o - %s \ +// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK %s + karka228 wrote: Sure, I

[clang] [clang][CodeGen] Propagate pragma set fast-math flags to floating point builtins (PR #90377)

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 4 +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -O3 -emit-llvm -o - %s \ karka228 wrote: The only reason for using `-O3` was to get rid of all

[clang] [clang][CodeGen] Propagate pragma set fast-math flags to floating point builtins (PR #90377)

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 4 +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -O3 -emit-llvm -o - %s \ +// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK %s + +// Reproducer for issue #87758 +// The

[clang] [clang][CodeGen] Propagate pragma set fast-math flags to floating point builtins (PR #90377)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90377 >From 80836f51573c8ba474a0b5d5890a489d5f0c7034 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:04:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Pre-commit reproducer for fast-math flags on calls

[clang] [clang][CodeGen] Propagate pragma set fast-math flags to floating point builtins (PR #90377)

https://github.com/karka228 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90377 This is a fix for the issue #87758 where fast-math flags are not propagated all builtins. It seems like pragmas with fast math flags was only propagated to calls of unary floating point builtins. This patch

[clang] [llvm] [test] Avoid writing to a potentially write-protected dir (PR #89242)

https://github.com/karka228 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89242 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [llvm] [test] Avoid writing to a potentially write-protected dir (PR #89242)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89242 >From 4cc801e00e80f9727ade71213193e8d5cc5610f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:24:13 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [test] Avoid writing to a potentially write-protected

[clang] [llvm] [test] Avoid writing to a potentially write-protected dir (PR #89242)

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.6-library %s -fnative-half-type -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -verify -verify-ignore-unexpected +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.6-library %s

[clang] [llvm] [test] Avoid writing to a potentially write-protected dir (PR #89242)

https://github.com/karka228 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89242 These tests just don't check the output written to the current directory. The current directory may be write protected e.g. in a sandboxed environment. Typically one would write `clang -o %t.o` for a writeable

[clang] Carving out -Wformat warning about scoped enums into a subwarning (PR #88595)

@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -std=c11 -fsyntax-only -Wformat -verify=okay %s // Verify that -Wformat-signedness with -Wno-format are not reported (gcc compat). karka228 wrote: That discussion is only about -Wformat

[clang] Carving out -Wformat warning about scoped enums into a subwarning (PR #88595)

@@ -218,5 +218,5 @@ void test_printf_unsigned_priX16(uint16_t x) { void test_suppress(int x) karka228 wrote: Same as above about gcc compatibility. The comment need at least to be updated. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88595

[clang] Carving out -Wformat warning about scoped enums into a subwarning (PR #88595)

@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -std=c11 -fsyntax-only -Wformat -verify=okay %s // Verify that -Wformat-signedness with -Wno-format are not reported (gcc compat). karka228 wrote: The -Wformat-signedness warning was

[clang] [llvm] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

https://github.com/karka228 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74440 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [llvm] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74440 >From 1dd6c32ee8e053c900e23f37d50f8c3f4868858a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:03:00 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness In

[clang] [llvm] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

karka228 wrote: > LGTM! Thanks. I will rebase and then "squash and merge" this to the main branch. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74440 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org

[clang] [llvm] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74440 >From aa9d6cd10ff32fdcdd3d1b2ef334aa70f56cccb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:03:00 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness In

[clang] [llvm] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

@@ -0,0 +1,223 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -std=c11 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wformat -Wformat-signedness %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64-pc-win32 -std=c11 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wformat -Wformat-signedness %s + +// Verify that -Wformat-signedness

[clang] [llvm] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

@@ -0,0 +1,223 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -std=c11 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wformat -Wformat-signedness %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64-pc-win32 -std=c11 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wformat -Wformat-signedness %s + +// Verify that -Wformat-signedness

[clang] [llvm] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

karka228 wrote: > > With the current implementation `-Wformat-signedness` by itself actually > > turn on the signedness warnings. This is not compatible with how gcc do it. > > I guess I have thought that it was not that important to be compatible with > > gcc in this respect. However if it

[clang] [llvm] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74440 >From aa9d6cd10ff32fdcdd3d1b2ef334aa70f56cccb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:03:00 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness In

[clang] [llvm] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74440 >From aa9d6cd10ff32fdcdd3d1b2ef334aa70f56cccb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:03:00 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness In

[clang] [llvm] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

karka228 wrote: > Can you also add a test showing the difference between `-Wformat > -Wformat-signedness` and `-Wformat-signedness` by itself (which does nothing)? With the current implementation `-Wformat-signedness` by itself actually turn on the signedness warnings. This is not compatible

[clang] [llvm] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74440 >From aa9d6cd10ff32fdcdd3d1b2ef334aa70f56cccb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:03:00 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness In

[clang] [llvm] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

karka228 wrote: > Sorry for the delayed response, this fell off my radar (thanks @Endilll for > mentioning this after meeting with @hazohelet!). No problem. As I wrote above I work in an out of tree backend and I have already implemented this in our downstream repo. Our customer that

[llvm] [clang] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

karka228 wrote: Ping. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74440 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[llvm] [clang] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

karka228 wrote: Ping. Lets pickup the discussion from before Christmas. Is the solution with the dummy warning (that @hazohelet wrote about in a previous comment) an acceptable solution? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74440 ___

[llvm] [clang] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74440 >From a80bf9d03f19d48c0aca4af7758dc49516da8825 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:03:00 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness In

[clang] [llvm] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

@@ -11881,6 +11896,8 @@ CheckPrintfHandler::checkFormatExpr(const analyze_printf::PrintfSpecifier , ICE->getType() == S.Context.UnsignedIntTy) { // All further checking is done on the subexpression ImplicitMatch = AT.matchesType(S.Context, ExprTy);

[clang] [llvm] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74440 >From a80bf9d03f19d48c0aca4af7758dc49516da8825 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:03:00 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness In

[clang] [llvm] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

karka228 wrote: > Alternatively, you could probably use `DiagnosticsEngine::isIgnored` to check > if the `-Wformat-signedness` is enabled or not, and control whether > `MatchSignedNess` is `NoMatch` or `Match`, as your first implementation did. > This way we can achieve GCC compatibility for

[clang] [llvm] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

karka228 wrote: > > 1. The option -Wformat-signedness is default off. > > > > 2. The -Wformat-signedness warnings are not enabled alone by the -Wformat > > option. > > > > 3. The -Wformat-signedness warnings are not enabled alone by the > > -Wformat-signedness option. > > > > 4. The

[llvm] [clang] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74440 >From a80bf9d03f19d48c0aca4af7758dc49516da8825 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:03:00 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness In

[clang] [llvm] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74440 >From a80bf9d03f19d48c0aca4af7758dc49516da8825 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:03:00 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness In

[llvm] [clang] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74440 >From a80bf9d03f19d48c0aca4af7758dc49516da8825 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:03:00 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness In

[llvm] [clang] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

karka228 wrote: I have started to implement defining the -Wformat-signedness option config in clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td as suggested originally by @hazohelet and I agree that the implementation is a lot cleaner that way. However before finishing implementing that I think

[llvm] [clang] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

karka228 wrote: > I'd like to understand the need for this diagnostic a bit more. I realize GCC > has it, but it's off-by-default in GCC and `-Wformat` does not enable it > either: https://godbolt.org/z/Gxczsjdj5 > > We believe that users don't enable off by default warnings often enough to

[llvm] [clang] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

@@ -918,6 +918,9 @@ def Wdeprecated : Flag<["-"], "Wdeprecated">, Group, HelpText<"Enable warnings for deprecated constructs and define __DEPRECATED">; def Wno_deprecated : Flag<["-"], "Wno-deprecated">, Group, Visibility<[ClangOption, CC1Option]>; +def

[clang] [llvm] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74440 >From a80bf9d03f19d48c0aca4af7758dc49516da8825 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:03:00 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness In

[llvm] [clang] [Sema] Implement support for -Wformat-signedness (PR #74440)

https://github.com/karka228 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74440 In gcc there exist a modifier option -Wformat-signedness that turns on additional signedness warnings in the already existing -Wformat warning. This patch implements that support in clang. >From

[clang] [Sema] Fixed faulty shift count warning (PR #69521)

https://github.com/karka228 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69521 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Sema] Fixed faulty shift count warning (PR #69521)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69521 >From db4a254b721eddacf592a647d3de4fd10a8032e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 16:40:53 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] [Sema] Fixed faulty shift count warning Constant values

[clang] [Sema] Fixed faulty shift count warning (PR #69521)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69521 >From a4a9fb73de9319acd26290ef31d1e17b127c0c3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 16:40:53 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] [Sema] Fixed faulty shift count warning Constant values

[clang] [Sema] Fixed faulty shift count warning (PR #69521)

karka228 wrote: Ping https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69521 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Sema] Fixed faulty shift count warning (PR #69521)

https://github.com/karka228 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69521 >From a9bfc65f6d6b0953cd762f851fb6044e1c4b8ab8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 16:40:53 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Sema] Fixed faulty shift count warning Constant

[clang] [Sema] Fixed faulty shift count warning (PR #69521)

https://github.com/karka228 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69521 Constant values of _BitInt have the bitwith to exactly fit the constant number. This patch fix a problem in Sema when building an APInt where the supplied bitwidth can become too small and simply truncate the

[clang-tools-extra] 39e9149 - Fix unused variable warning in Protocol.cpp, NFCI

Author: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: 2020-04-07T08:39:17+02:00 New Revision: 39e9149d8e12d77cd389f55860ac2cb9a30b4552 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/39e9149d8e12d77cd389f55860ac2cb9a30b4552 DIFF:

[clang-tools-extra] 7055cd4 - Remove extra ';', NFC

Author: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: 2020-03-26T11:23:59+01:00 New Revision: 7055cd42b5ffc88757eb3d12192047abe63a3714 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7055cd42b5ffc88757eb3d12192047abe63a3714 DIFF:

[clang] 073cdb2 - [clang][test] Minor fixes in testcase absolute-paths-symlinks.c

Author: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: 2019-12-26T09:33:21+01:00 New Revision: 073cdb239044dc056a3c79b995265f640ffb40e6 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/073cdb239044dc056a3c79b995265f640ffb40e6 DIFF:

[clang] e8efac4 - [clang] Fix the canonicalization of paths in -fdiagnostics-absolute-paths

Author: Karl-Johan Karlsson Date: 2019-12-20T09:16:33+01:00 New Revision: e8efac4b15303932581c128dc3976f4359388338 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e8efac4b15303932581c128dc3976f4359388338 DIFF:

r371969 - Change signature of __builtin_rotateright64 back to unsigned

Author: karka Date: Mon Sep 16 02:52:23 2019 New Revision: 371969 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=371969=rev Log: Change signature of __builtin_rotateright64 back to unsigned The signature of __builtin_rotateright64 was by misstake changed from unsigned to signed in r360863, this

r360863 - [builtin] Fixed definitions of builtins that rely on the int/long long type is 32/64 bits

Author: karka Date: Thu May 16 00:18:02 2019 New Revision: 360863 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=360863=rev Log: [builtin] Fixed definitions of builtins that rely on the int/long long type is 32/64 bits Summary: The definition of the builtins __builtin_bswap32,

r339112 - Fix clash of gcc toolchains in driver regression tests

Author: karka Date: Tue Aug 7 01:10:33 2018 New Revision: 339112 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=339112=rev Log: Fix clash of gcc toolchains in driver regression tests For some regression tests the path to the right toolchain is specified using the -sysroot switch. However, if

r338831 - Fix unused variable warning in tablegen generated code

Author: karka Date: Fri Aug 3 02:13:15 2018 New Revision: 338831 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=338831=rev Log: Fix unused variable warning in tablegen generated code Modified: cfe/trunk/utils/TableGen/ClangAttrEmitter.cpp Modified:

r331438 - Fix -Wunused-variable warning in Clang.cpp

Author: karka Date: Wed May 2 22:53:29 2018 New Revision: 331438 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=331438=rev Log: Fix -Wunused-variable warning in Clang.cpp Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp URL:

r312623 - Debug info: Fixed faulty debug locations for attributed statements

Author: karka Date: Wed Sep 6 01:47:18 2017 New Revision: 312623 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=312623=rev Log: Debug info: Fixed faulty debug locations for attributed statements Summary: As the attributed statements are considered simple statements no stoppoint was generated