Re: Report from last week OGC meeting

2024-04-03 Thread Marco Neumann
. > > > Futures directions > > OGC Standards try to met the FAIR principle: Findable, Accessible, > Interoperable, Reusable. OGC has been traditionally focused on a path > from Findable to Reusable. It resulted in a lot of metadata, because > different users may be interested in different aspects of a feature, and > those aspects needed to be described in metadata in order to be > findable. But the raise of A.I. changes the focus. All reusable data can > be consumed by A.I., which them make those data findable. So the path > can also be in the opposite direction, from Reusable to Findable. > > Martin > > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: [ANN] Apache Jena 5.0.0

2024-03-20 Thread Marco Neumann
Thank you Andy for your continued leadership in the Apache Jena project and the committers and testers for helping to bring the Jena 5 release to the wider developer and user communities around the world. All The Best, Marco Marco Neumann Lotico Community Lead http://www.lotico.com On Wed

Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 5.0.0

2024-03-19 Thread Marco Neumann
earlier will not work. > > > --- > > > Checking: > > + are the GPG signatures fine? > + are the checksums correct? > + is there a source archive? > + can the source archive be built? >(NB This requires a "mvn install" first time) > + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact >(both source and binary artifacts)? > + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? > if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? > + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources? > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: Requesting advice on Fuseki memory settings

2024-03-11 Thread Marco Neumann
e collection in Java is often delayed; memory is not freed as > > > quickly as we would expect it, and the heap limit is reached quickly > > > if multiple parallel queries are run > > > * long running database queries can send regular memory to Gen2, that > > > is not actively cleaned by the garbage collector > > > * memory-mapped files are also garbage-collected (and perhaps they > > > could go to Gen2 as well, using more and more storage space). > > > > > > Could you please explain the possible reasons behind such a behaviour? > > > And finally could you please suggest a more appropriate configuration > > > for our use case? > > > > > > Thanks in advance and best wishes, > > > Gaspar Bartalus > > > > > > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: [geosparql] How can I specify a planar geometry?

2024-01-06 Thread Marco Neumann
that idea, needs a bit more clarification On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 3:01 PM Claude Warren wrote: > Perhaps we should think about a Geometry SPARQL extension. > > On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 1:51 PM Marco Neumann > wrote: > > > It used to be all on Google Code. I believe Go

Re: [geosparql] How can I specify a planar geometry?

2024-01-06 Thread Marco Neumann
he functions. > > Claude > > On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 12:43 PM Marco Neumann > wrote: > > > yes, a lot of the geosparql functions will push you towards geo. > > > > It might be better to just reuse the existing low level functions. My > first > > spatial imp

Re: [geosparql] How can I specify a planar geometry?

2024-01-06 Thread Marco Neumann
- Geof.SF_OVERLAPS >- Geof.SF_INTERSECTS >- Geof.SF_TOUCHES >- Geof.DISTANCE_NAME >- SpatialExtension.NEARBY > > I may just revert to writing a couple of filter functions to do what I > want, but I was trying to learn the existing library. > > Claude > >

Re: [geosparql] How can I specify a planar geometry?

2024-01-06 Thread Marco Neumann
of functions (access methods) would you like to perform on the data? On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 8:24 AM Claude Warren wrote: > Yes just x and y on a flat surface. > > On Sat 6 Jan 2024, 00:45 Marco Neumann, wrote: > > > Can you give an example? you just want to use x and

Re: [geosparql] How can I specify a planar geometry?

2024-01-05 Thread Marco Neumann
le map). > Is there a way to specify this? > > Claude > > -- > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: Jena5: what to expect

2023-12-28 Thread Marco Neumann
neral QueryExecution builders are full query > >> execution setup. > >> > >> Local execution builder: > >> QueryExecution.create()... > >> > >> Remote execution builder: > >> QueryExecution.service(URL)... > >> > >> ** QueryExecution variable substitution > >> > >> Using "substitution", where the query is modified by replacing one or > >> more variables by RDF terms, is now preferred to using "initial > >> bindings", where query solutions include (var,value) pairs. > >> > >> "substitution" is available for all queries, local and remote, not just > >> local executions. > >> > >> > >> Fuseki Users > >> > >> Fuseki: Uses the jakarta namespace for servlets and Fuseki has been > >> upgraded to use Eclipse Jetty12. > >> > >> Apache Tomcat10 or later, is required for running the WAR file. > >> Tomcat 9 or earlier will not work. > >> > > > > > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: Jena5: what to expect

2023-12-28 Thread Marco Neumann
.service(URL)... > > ** QueryExecution variable substitution > > Using "substitution", where the query is modified by replacing one or > more variables by RDF terms, is now preferred to using "initial > bindings", where query solutions include (var,value) pairs. > > "substitution" is available for all queries, local and remote, not just > local executions. > > > Fuseki Users > > Fuseki: Uses the jakarta namespace for servlets and Fuseki has been > upgraded to use Eclipse Jetty12. > > Apache Tomcat10 or later, is required for running the WAR file. > Tomcat 9 or earlier will not work. > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: GeoSparql example?

2023-12-02 Thread Marco Neumann
Did that spatial SPARQL query work for you Claude? Marco On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 8:08 PM Claude Warren wrote: > can you give me an example of a query? > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2023, 19:14 Marco Neumann wrote: > > > just go ahead you are almost there > > > > wkt:asW

Re: GeoSparql example?

2023-12-02 Thread Marco Neumann
ions work. > > Nick > > On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 6:58 pm, Marco Neumann <[marco.neum...@gmail.com > ](mailto:On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 6:58 pm, Marco Neumann < wrote: > > > Nick, we only support GeoSPARQL 1.0 at this point in time in the Jena > > project with some extensi

Re: GeoSparql example?

2023-12-02 Thread Marco Neumann
amples than GeoSPARQL 1.0: > > https://opengeospatial.github.io/ogc-geosparql/geosparql11/spec.html > > Nick > > > > On Saturday, 2 December 2023 at 6:39 AM, Marco Neumann < > marco.neum...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > PREFIX spatial:http://jena.apache.org/sp

Re: GeoSparql example?

2023-12-01 Thread Marco Neumann
Fri, Dec 1, 2023, 19:14 Marco Neumann wrote: > > > just go ahead you are almost there > > > > wkt:asWKT "Polygon (( -5.5 -5.5, -4.5 -5.5, -4.5 -4.5, -5.5 -4.5, -5.5 > > -5.5 ))"^^wkt:wktLiteral > > > > same with the LINESTRING > > > >

Re: GeoSparql example?

2023-12-01 Thread Marco Neumann
; place the polygon into a model or dataset? > > Once the polygon is in, what is the query that will do the equivalent of > the jst Geometry.iswithinDistance between the Linestring and the Polygon? > > Thanks, > Claude > > -- > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: UI improvements Was: process question.

2023-11-30 Thread Marco Neumann
@ as Andy pointed are better as not > everyone watches the GitHub issues. > > Cheers, > > Bruno > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 15:30, Marco Neumann > wrote: > > > So for example we sometimes work with hundreds of files for uploads via > the > > fuseki UI. > >

Re: UI improvements Was: process question.

2023-11-29 Thread Marco Neumann
est. > > General discussions, dev@ > > Andy > > On 29/11/2023 09:18, Marco Neumann wrote: > > Bruno, > > how do you gather input/ideas for UI improvements? > > > > Best, > > Marco > -- --- Marco Neumann

UI improvements Was: process question.

2023-11-29 Thread Marco Neumann
are required before code can be merged? > > > > Claude > > > > -- > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren > > > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: Querying URL with square brackets

2023-11-25 Thread Marco Neumann
I was looking for an IRI validator and this one didn't come up in the search engines. This service might need a bit more visibility and some incoming links. Marco On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 1:34 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 24/11/2023 10:05, Marco Neumann wrote: > > (side n

Re: Querying URL with square brackets

2023-11-24 Thread Marco Neumann
xample of yet > another "quirk" between raw data and browsers (where this kind of data is > supposed to be used). > > Still don't understand the problem :) http://example.org/book#1 > uniquely identifies a resource, but you'll need to get the whole > http://example.org/book document to retrieve it. That's just how HTTP > works. > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: Querying URL with square brackets

2023-11-24 Thread Marco Neumann
question of what other characters > I MUST avoid. > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: Querying URL with square brackets

2023-11-24 Thread Marco Neumann
ey are much easier to read/edit manually), what is the list of > characters that MUST be %-encoded? > > > > Sent: Friday, November 24, 2023 at 9:55 AM > > From: "Marco Neumann" > > To: users@jena.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Querying URL with square brackets > > > > Laura, see jena issue #2102 > > https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/2102 > > > > Marco > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: Querying URL with square brackets

2023-11-24 Thread Marco Neumann
tried escaping, "foo\[1\]bar" but it doesn't work. > I tried converting from a string, FILTER(?id = URI(" > http://example.org/foo[1]bar;)) but it doesn't work > What else could I try? > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: Semantics of SPARQL Update Delete

2023-11-10 Thread Marco Neumann
chatGPT has made an interesting and useful attempt for a change [image: image.png] On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 9:03 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 10/11/2023 20:35, Marco Neumann wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 5:51 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > >> > &

Re: Semantics of SPARQL Update Delete

2023-11-10 Thread Marco Neumann
ok I see, yes that (*) was just pseudocode. Thanks Andy. On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 9:00 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 10/11/2023 18:19, Marco Neumann wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 5:51 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 10/

Re: Semantics of SPARQL Update Delete

2023-11-10 Thread Marco Neumann
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 5:51 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 10/11/2023 12:33, Marco Neumann wrote: > > Should DELETE {URI URI * } not update all matching graph patterns? > > No. > (and that's bad syntax) > > > I had a case where only DELETE {URI

Re: Semantics of SPARQL Update Delete

2023-11-10 Thread Marco Neumann
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 5:51 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 10/11/2023 12:33, Marco Neumann wrote: > > Should DELETE {URI URI * } not update all matching graph patterns? > > No. > (and that's bad syntax) > DELETE { ?x } is bad syntax? > > I had a case wher

Semantics of SPARQL Update Delete

2023-11-10 Thread Marco Neumann
{ } Marco -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Jena 4.10.0 RC 1

2023-11-04 Thread Marco Neumann
didate. > > > > The deadline is > > > > Friday, 27th October 2023 at 18:00 UTC > > > > Please vote to approve this release: > > > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > > [ ] 0 Don't care > > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 4.10.0 RC 1

2023-10-24 Thread Marco Neumann
built? >(NB This requires a "mvn install" first time) > + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact >(both source and binary artifacts)? > + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? > if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? > + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources? > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: Towards Jena 4.10.0

2023-10-19 Thread Marco Neumann
losed issues and 42 PRs > > There is still some sorting and PR catch-up out to do. > > Jena 4.10.0 still has a minimum requirement of Java11, not Java17. > > Jena 4.9.0 was 2023-07-08. > > Andy > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: Transactions over http (fuseki)

2023-08-17 Thread Marco Neumann
you recommend > > > something different? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > Gaspar > > > > > > PS: Sorry for the duplicate, I have the feeling that my other email > > address > > > is blocked somehow. > > > > > -- > > Lorenz Bühmann > > Research Associate/Scientific Developer > > > > Email buehm...@infai.org > > > > Institute for Applied Informatics e.V. (InfAI) | Goerdelerring 9 | 04109 > > Leipzig | Germany > > > > > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: Mystery memory leak in fuseki

2023-07-12 Thread Marco Neumann
e JVM > >>>>> metrics: > >>>>> - Heap and and non-heap are stable at around 100MB total (mostly > >>>>> non-heap metaspace). > >>>>> - Mapped buffers stay at 50MB and remain long term stable. > >>>>> - Direct memory buffers being allocated up to around 500MB then being > >>>>> reclaimed. Since there are no sparql queries at all we assume this is > >>>>> jetty NIO buffers being churned as a result of the metric scrapes. > >>>>> However, this direct buffer behaviour seems stable, it cycles between > >>>>> 0 and 500MB on approx a 10min cycle but is stable over a period of > >>>>> days and shows no leaks. > >>>>> > >>>>> Yet the java process grows from an initial 100MB to at least 3GB. > >>>>> This can occur in the space of a couple of hours or can take up to a > >>>>> day or two with no predictability in how fast. > >>>>> > >>>>> Presumably there is some low level JNI space allocated by Jetty (?) > >>>>> which is invisible to all the JVM metrics and is not being reliably > >>>>> reclaimed. > >>>>> > >>>>> Trying 4.6.0, which we've had less problems with elsewhere, that > >>>>> seems to grow to around 1GB (plus up to 0.5GB for the cycling direct > >>>>> memory buffers) and then stays stable (at least on a three day soak > >>>>> test). We could live with allocating 1.5GB to a system that should > >>>>> only need a few 100MB but concerned that it may not be stable in the > >>>>> really long term and, in any case, would rather be able to update to > >>>>> more recent fuseki versions. > >>>>> > >>>>> Trying 4.8.0 on java 17 it grows rapidly to around 1GB again but then > >>>>> keeps ticking up slowly at random intervals. We project that it would > >>>>> take a few weeks to grow the scale it did under java 11 but it will > >>>>> still eventually kill the machine. > >>>>> > >>>>> Anyone seem anything remotely like this? > >>>>> > >>>>> Dave > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] 500M heap may be overkill but there can be some complex queries > >>>>> and that should still leave plenty of space for OS buffers etc in the > >>>>> remaining memory on a 4GB machine. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > > > > > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: Mystery memory leak in fuseki

2023-07-11 Thread Marco Neumann
This can occur in the space of a couple of hours or can take up to a > >>> day or two with no predictability in how fast. > >>> > >>> Presumably there is some low level JNI space allocated by Jetty (?) > >>> which is invisible to all the JVM metrics and is not being reliably > >>> reclaimed. > >>> > >>> Trying 4.6.0, which we've had less problems with elsewhere, that > >>> seems to grow to around 1GB (plus up to 0.5GB for the cycling direct > >>> memory buffers) and then stays stable (at least on a three day soak > >>> test). We could live with allocating 1.5GB to a system that should > >>> only need a few 100MB but concerned that it may not be stable in the > >>> really long term and, in any case, would rather be able to update to > >>> more recent fuseki versions. > >>> > >>> Trying 4.8.0 on java 17 it grows rapidly to around 1GB again but then > >>> keeps ticking up slowly at random intervals. We project that it would > >>> take a few weeks to grow the scale it did under java 11 but it will > >>> still eventually kill the machine. > >>> > >>> Anyone seem anything remotely like this? > >>> > >>> Dave > >>> > >>> [1] 500M heap may be overkill but there can be some complex queries > >>> and that should still leave plenty of space for OS buffers etc in the > >>> remaining memory on a 4GB machine. > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 4.9.0 RC1

2023-07-08 Thread Marco Neumann
res fine? > + are the checksums correct? > + is there a source archive? > + can the source archive be built? >(NB This requires a "mvn install" first time) > + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact >(both source and binary artifacts)? > + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? > if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? > + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources? > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: Binary literals

2023-05-04 Thread Marco Neumann
ient/another way to store binary literals in Jena? > > > > > > The reason I ask is that a future version of GeoSPARQL might want to > include WKB - Well-Known Binary - as a geometry format option. We would > hope this can be efficiently accessed by a spatial index so we want to know > how to handle perhaps a custom data type, perhaps geo:wkbLiteral, and how > best to store this in Jena, perhaps not as hex text. > > > > > > Thanks, Nick > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: CVE-2023-22665: Apache Jena: Exposure of arbitrary execution in script engine expressions.

2023-04-24 Thread Marco Neumann
en invoking custom scripts. It allows a remote user to > execute arbitrary javascript via a SPARQL query. > > Credit: > > L3yx of Syclover Security Team (reporter) > > References: > > https://jena.apache.org/ > https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22665 > > -- --- Marco Neumann

Community Over Code NA ASF Semantic GeoSpatial Track

2023-04-17 Thread Marco Neumann
efforts being presented as well. I am looking forward to your submissions Marco -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: Volunteer for organizing an ApacheCon geospatial track?

2023-02-27 Thread Marco Neumann
so I think a geospatial track should always be present at apache. so I would volunteer in assisting to organize a geospatial track. Marco On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 5:56 PM Martin Desruisseaux < martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> wrote: > Hello Marco > > Le 27/02/2023 à 18:40

Re: Volunteer for organizing an ApacheCon geospatial track?

2023-02-27 Thread Marco Neumann
list: > > > If you would like to run a track at Community Over Code 2023 (Formerly > > "ApacheCon") please speak up. > Do we have volunteer(s) for organizing a geospatial track this year > again? If yes, the planner would like to get name(s) by March 1st. > > Martin > > > -- --- Marco Neumann

[Wikidata] Re: units

2023-01-24 Thread Marco Neumann
Enjoy Best, Marco On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 11:30 PM Olaf Simons wrote: > ...alles was ich machte, war mal wieder 30 mal komplizierter, > > vielen Dank! > Olaf > > > > Marco Neumann hat am 24.01.2023 23:48 CET > geschrieben: > > >

[Wikidata] Re: units

2023-01-24 Thread Marco Neumann
https://tinyurl.com/2nbqnavq ___ Wikidata mailing list -- wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org/message/NW3SGOW6LHX3XAYMMWJZ72LDAWSJ73MU/ To unsubscribe send an email to

[Wikidata-tech] Re: Fehlerhafte Anzeige

2023-01-13 Thread Marco Neumann
ups... "Wien Geschichte Wiki" und die neue und korrekte ID mit der Q Form von Peter Kreuden (Q76660) verlinken https://www.geschichtewiki.wien.gv.at/Spezial:Mit_Formular_bearbeiten/Person/Peter_Kreuder On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 8:43 AM Marco Neumann wrote: > Danke für Deinen Beitr

[Wikidata-tech] Re: Fehlerhafte Anzeige

2023-01-13 Thread Marco Neumann
wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe send an email to wikidata-tech-le...@lists.wikimedia.org > -- --- Marco Neumann ___ Wikidata-tech mailing list -- wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikidata-tech-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 4.7.0 RC2

2022-12-27 Thread Marco Neumann
java17 and compiled for java11 bytecode. > + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact >(both source and binary artifacts)? > + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? > if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? > + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources? > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: [] [] Apache Jena 4.7.0 RC1

2022-12-27 Thread Marco Neumann
ted with an error: 1 (Exit value: 1) -> [Help 1] On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 1:32 PM Marco Neumann wrote: > had a look at the log and was able to fix this error. The system was > missing the Xvfb dependency which seems to be required by the Cypress test > framework. > > it's now passing t

Re: [] [] Apache Jena 4.7.0 RC1

2022-12-26 Thread Marco Neumann
ser chrome' failed. org.apache.commons.exec.ExecuteException: > > That message is only the log of the test failing - there will be text > above indicating what happened in the e2e tests. > > Andy > > On 24/12/2022 20:50, Marco Neumann wrote: > > so far I can only confirm that it fails. I will add mo

Re: [] [] Apache Jena 4.7.0 RC1

2022-12-24 Thread Marco Neumann
e. > > Andy > > On Sat, 24 Dec 2022, 18:35 Marco Neumann, wrote: > > > while you are at it also take a look at the issue with > > > > jena-fuseki-ui: Failed to run task: 'yarn run test:e2e -- --headless > > --browser chrome' failed. org.apache.commons.exec.Execute

Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache Jena 4.7.0 RC1

2022-12-24 Thread Marco Neumann
Approve the release > > [ ] 0 Don't care > > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > > > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: LATERAL

2022-12-20 Thread Marco Neumann
I take note of your keyword suggestion "LATERAL" vs "LATERAL JOIN". On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 6:01 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 20/12/2022 17:24, Marco Neumann wrote: > > OK I will repeat this elsewhere again but as you are aware there was > > a go

Re: [] Apache Jena 4.7.0 RC1

2022-12-20 Thread Marco Neumann
, 2022 at 5:06 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > > On 20/12/2022 16:44, Marco Neumann wrote: > > The URL to Lateral Joins is broken > > https://jena.apache.org/documentation/query/lateral-join.html > > The web site is updated when the release happens after the VOTE. > > It

Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 4.7.0 RC1

2022-12-20 Thread Marco Neumann
; + can the source archive be built? >(NB This requires a "mvn install" first time) > + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact > (both source and binary artifacts)? > + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? > if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? > + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources? > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: density of GraphUtil not recognized

2022-12-11 Thread Marco Neumann
gt; > coefficient? > > > > No. > > > > What led you to thinking there was? > > > > Andy > > > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: GraphMem in 4.6

2022-10-18 Thread Marco Neumann
ext().set(ARQ.optReorderBGP, false); > > Many thanks, > Holger > > > > > On 18 Oct 2022, at 11:29 am, Élie Roux > wrote: > > > > Perhaps this is an instance of > > https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/1533 ? What triple reordering > > optimization are y

Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 4.6.1 RC1

2022-09-01 Thread Marco Neumann
(NB This requires a "mvn install" first time) > + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact >(both source and binary artifacts)? > + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? > if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? > + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources? > -- --- Marco Neumann

Re: Apache Jena - 10 years as an Apache Project.

2022-04-18 Thread Marco Neumann
hurray. TLP. On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 5:40 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > Today is the 10th anniversary of Apache Jena as a Top Level Project of > the Apache Software Foundation! > > -- --- Marco Neumann KONA

Re: WG: Broken GND dataset after loading with tdb2.xloader+tdb2.tdbloader

2022-03-03 Thread Marco Neumann
l.gz > > > ../var/gnd/2021-11/src/gnd-sc.ttl > > > ../var/gnd/2021-11/src/gnd-sc_notation.ttl > > > ../var/gnd/2021-11/src/gndo.ttl > > > > > > and got a steadily decreasing rate (see below). On the other hand, the > total > > load time is nice. tdbstats ran correctly afterwards, and the query for > > gndo:DifferentiatedPerson works as expected. > > > > > > Cheers - Joachim > -- --- Marco Neumann KONA

Re: Geo indexing Wikidata

2022-02-21 Thread Marco Neumann
tried the RDFS dataset feature Andy introduced which allows for > "RDFS Simple" - inference (subClassOf, subPropertyOf, domain, range) - > this should be sufficient, all we need is domain/range reasoning. So I > added it to the assembler and forwarded this RDFS dataset to the &g

Re: Duplicates in the "Available services" list in UI?

2022-02-20 Thread Marco Neumann
eki: BUILD_DATE: 2022-02-09T18:01:44Z > > > > > > > > <#service_wikidata> rdf:type fuseki:Service ; > > > > > > > > rdfs:label "wikidata TDB Service (RW)" ; > > > > > > > > fuseki:name "wikidata" ; > > > > > > > > fuseki:serviceQuery "query" ; > > > > > > > > fuseki:serviceQuery "sparql" ; > > > > > > > > fuseki:serviceUpdate"update" ; > > > > > > > > fuseki:serviceUpload"upload" ; > > > > > > > > fuseki:serviceReadWriteGraphStore"data" ; > > > > > > > > fuseki:serviceReadGraphStore"get" ; > > > > > > > > fuseki:dataset :wikidata ; > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Joachim Neubert > > > > > > > > ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics > > > > > > > > Neuer Jungfernstieg 21 > > > > 20354 Hamburg > > > > > > > > Phone +49-40-42834-462 > > > > > > > > -- --- Marco Neumann KONA

Re: Duplicates in the "Available services" list in UI?

2022-02-19 Thread Marco Neumann
"get" ; > > fuseki:dataset :wikidata ; > > . > > > > > > > > -- > > Joachim Neubert > > > > ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics > > Neuer Jungfernstieg 21 > 20354 Hamburg > > Phone +49-40-42834-462 > > > -- --- Marco Neumann KONA

Re: Loading Wikidata

2022-02-18 Thread Marco Neumann
3.0. > > CPU is 4 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6254 CPU @ 3.10GHz / 18 core (144 cores > in total) > > Cheers, Joachim > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: Marco Neumann > > Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Februar 2022 10:00 > > An: users@jena.apache.org > &

Re: Loading Wikidata

2022-02-18 Thread Marco Neumann
ough colleagues had > jobs > > on the machine too, which might have influenced the results). > > > > > > -During the extended POS/POS/OSP sort periods, I saw only one > or two > > gzip instances (used in the background), which perhaps were a > bottleneck. I > > wonder if using pigz could extend parallel processing. > > > > > > If you think it usefull, I am happy to share more details. If I can > help with > > running some particular tests on a massive parallel machine, please let > me > > know. > > > > > > Cheers, Joachim > > > > > > -- > > > Joachim Neubert > > > > > > ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics Neuer Jungfernstieg 21 > > > 20354 Hamburg > > > Phone +49-40-42834-462 > > > > > > > -- --- Marco Neumann KONA

Re: [] Apache Jena 4.4.0 RC2

2022-01-31 Thread Marco Neumann
Password for everything would be setting /**= to authBasic. > > Andy > > On 30/01/2022 17:35, Marco Neumann wrote: > > +1 > > > > ps: on the new fuseki UI it's not prompting for username and password > > even if set at load time. only when creating

Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 4.4.0 RC2

2022-01-30 Thread Marco Neumann
nse streams > > > > == > > > > The deadline is > > > > Wednesday, 2nd February 2022 at 19:00 UTC. > > > > Please vote to approve this release: > > > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > > [ ] 0 Don't care > > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > -- --- Marco Neumann KONA

Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 4.4.0 RC1

2022-01-30 Thread Marco Neumann
ght try to write a blog post or maybe somewhere else like lwn or similar > that would receive some feedback on UI/UX & JS benefits... a good way to > showcase what was done, get some feedback (hopefully constructive) and > maybe some readers interested in participating too. >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 4.4.0 RC1

2022-01-29 Thread Marco Neumann
ce archive? > + can the source archive be built? >(NB This requires a "mvn install" first time) > + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact >(both source and binary artifacts)? > + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? > if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? > + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources? > -- --- Marco Neumann KONA

Re: [topbraid-users] Re: TopBraid 7.1 Announcement

2022-01-26 Thread Marco Neumann
Google Groups >> "TopBraid Suite Users" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-2213) Jena GeoSPARQL Tests Fail With SIS 1.1

2022-01-24 Thread Marco Neumann (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17481063#comment-17481063 ] Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2213: - Ok I see [~andy] not a big deal these current values now

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-2213) Jena GeoSPARQL Tests Fail With SIS 1.1

2022-01-24 Thread Marco Neumann (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17480983#comment-17480983 ] Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2213: - [~andy] if you have used the values from the diff as posted we

[jira] [Closed] (JENA-2213) Jena GeoSPARQL Tests Fail With SIS 1.1

2022-01-24 Thread Marco Neumann (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Neumann closed JENA-2213. --- Fix Version/s: Jena 4.4.0 Resolution: Fixed changes to values in tests have been made to suit

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JENA-2213) Jena GeoSPARQL Tests Fail With SIS 1.1

2022-01-23 Thread Marco Neumann (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17480758#comment-17480758 ] Marco Neumann edited comment on JENA-2213 at 1/23/22, 11:40 PM: diff --git

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JENA-2213) Jena GeoSPARQL Tests Fail With SIS 1.1

2022-01-23 Thread Marco Neumann (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17480758#comment-17480758 ] Marco Neumann edited comment on JENA-2213 at 1/23/22, 11:35 PM: diff --git

Re: Towards Jena 4.4.0

2022-01-23 Thread Marco Neumann
I have attached the diff to the JENA-2213 ticket Marco On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 11:19 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 23/01/2022 23:05, Marco Neumann wrote: > > Do I have to initiate the merger in jira from #2213 or is this something > > you do from #1169? > > #11

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-2213) Jena GeoSPARQL Tests Fail With SIS 1.1

2022-01-23 Thread Marco Neumann (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17480758#comment-17480758 ] Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2213: - diff --git a/jena-geosparql/src/test/java/org/apache/jena

Re: Towards Jena 4.4.0

2022-01-23 Thread Marco Neumann
tests to be > appropriate for OSGB which can be done at leisure (before or after > 4.4.0)? I don't see any non-test changes below. > > Andy > > On 22/01/2022 19:33, Marco Neumann wrote: > > in addition to the change to the pom.xml to bump SIS up to 1.1 > > >

Re: Towards Jena 4.4.0

2022-01-22 Thread Marco Neumann
OS_Y1, OS_Y2), SpatialIndexTestData.OSGB_SRS_INFO); SearchEnvelope result = SearchEnvelope.build(geometryWrapper, SpatialIndexTestData.OSGB_SRS_INFO, direction); assertEquals(expResult, result); } On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 7:22 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 22/01/2022 17:3

Re: Towards Jena 4.4.0

2022-01-22 Thread Marco Neumann
jena/pull/1169 > > ? (which is the Diff on the ticket, after cleaning up a bit) > > On 22/01/2022 15:58, Marco Neumann wrote: > > I have created a fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213 > > > > this involves an upgrade to SIS1.1 > > > > How a

Re: Towards Jena 4.4.0

2022-01-22 Thread Marco Neumann
gt; > == Assembler for GeoSPARQL > > > > This makes it easier to use GeoPSARQL in a plain Fuseki. > > > > == xloader > > > > TDB2 xloader has usability improvements based on our wikidata testing by > > Øyvind, Lorenz and Marco, including full wikiData (16.7B triples) as > > well as "truthy" (6.6B triples). > > > > In particular, it now has "--threads=" -- Lorenz reported goo > > improvements (if the server has the hardware!). > > > > > > TDB1 xloader is still the old tdbloader2 with some of the earlier > > improvements of TDB2 xloader. > > > > For me, TDB2 is the preferred database. > > TDB1 exists because it is out there; it may get back ports, it may not. > > > > == Other: > > > > Dependencies up to date: log4j 2.17.1; Update to Titanium 1.2.0 > > > > > -- --- Marco Neumann KONA

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JENA-2213) Jena GeoSPARQL Tests Fail With SIS 1.1

2022-01-19 Thread Marco Neumann (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17478800#comment-17478800 ] Marco Neumann edited comment on JENA-2213 at 1/19/22, 4:17 PM: --- so I have

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-2213) Jena GeoSPARQL Tests Fail With SIS 1.1

2022-01-19 Thread Marco Neumann (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17478800#comment-17478800 ] Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2213: - so I have compiled the project the SIS1.1 jar which seems

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-2213) Jena GeoSPARQL Tests Fail With SIS 1.1

2022-01-19 Thread Marco Neumann (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17478775#comment-17478775 ] Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2213: - "Not for me. main fails to compile wi

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-2213) Jena GeoSPARQL Tests Fail With SIS 1.1

2022-01-19 Thread Marco Neumann (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17478662#comment-17478662 ] Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2213: - jena-geosparql does compile and pass tests without "ext

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-2213) Jena GeoSPARQL Tests Fail With SIS 1.1

2022-01-19 Thread Marco Neumann (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17478645#comment-17478645 ] Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2213: - that is indeed the case with a very limited set of reference

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JENA-2213) Jena GeoSPARQL Tests Fail With SIS 1.1

2022-01-19 Thread Marco Neumann (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17478600#comment-17478600 ] Marco Neumann edited comment on JENA-2213 at 1/19/22, 11:37 AM: [~andy] 5

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-2213) Jena GeoSPARQL Tests Fail With SIS 1.1

2022-01-19 Thread Marco Neumann (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17478600#comment-17478600 ] Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2213: - 5 Failures SRSInfoTest.testBuildDomainEnvelope_OSGB36:104

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-2213) Jena GeoSPARQL Tests Fail With SIS 1.1

2022-01-19 Thread Marco Neumann (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17478574#comment-17478574 ] Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2213: - Andy, these are value comparison errors based on a change

Re: Testing tdb2.xloader

2021-12-28 Thread Marco Neumann
bit. http://www.lotico.com/temp/LOG-45497 Best, Marco On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 8:59 AM Marco Neumann wrote: > Thank you Andy. found it in revisions somewhere > > just finished another run with truthy > > http://lotico.com/temp/LOG-1214 > > will now increase RAM be

[Wikidata] Re: WDQS State of the Union, Dec 2021

2021-12-22 Thread Marco Neumann
Wikidata mailing list -- wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe send an email to wikidata-le...@lists.wikimedia.org > -- --- Marco Neumann KONA ___ Wikidata mailing list -- wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikidata-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

Re: Testing tdb2.xloader

2021-12-21 Thread Marco Neumann
so the file is there ... somewhere: > > > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/LorenzBuehmann/e3619d53cf4c158c4e4902fd7d6ed7c3/raw/9049cf8b559ce685b4293fca10d8b1c07cc79c43/tdb2_xloader_wikidata_truthy.log > > Andy > > On 19/12/2021 17:56, Marco Neumann wrote: > > Thank

Re: Testing tdb2.xloader

2021-12-19 Thread Marco Neumann
value is > > (count -1983667112)) > > which indicates this. I opened a ticket: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2225 > > > [1] > https://gist.github.com/LorenzBuehmann/e3619d53cf4c158c4e4902fd7d6ed7c3 > > On 18.12.21 11:35, Marco Neumann wrote: &

Re: Testing tdb2.xloader

2021-12-18 Thread Marco Neumann
f data will help: > > > > Experimenting with very small cache settings. > > > > Letting my slow load keep going to see if there is the same > > characteristics at the index stage. There shouldn't be if nodeToNodeId > > is the cause; it's only an influence in the data

Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 4.3.2 RC 1

2021-12-17 Thread Marco Neumann
is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact >(both source and binary artifacts)? > + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? > if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? > + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources? > -- --- Marco Neumann KONA

Re: Testing tdb2.xloader

2021-12-16 Thread Marco Neumann
14 12:21 prefixes-data.obj > > -rw-r--r-- 1 8,0M Dez 14 12:21 prefixes.idn > > -rw-r--r-- 1 24 Dez 15 05:41 SPO.bpt > > -rw-r--r-- 1 148G Dez 15 11:25 SPO.dat > > -rw-r--r-- 1 24 Dez 15 05:41 SPOG.bpt > > -rw-r--r-- 1 8,0M Dez 14 12:21 SPOG.dat > > -rw-r

Re: Testing tdb2.xloader

2021-12-16 Thread Marco Neumann
gt; 6,560,468,631 triples/quads 129,331 TPS > >> 23:46:13 INFO Terms :: Add: 1,000,000 Index (Batch: 237,755 / > >> Avg: 237,755) > >> > >> * The ingest data step really slows down on the "ingest data stage": > >> At the > >> current rate, if I calculated correctly, it looks like > >> PKG.CmdxIngestData > >> has 10 days left before it finishes. > > > > Ouch. > > > >> * When I saw sort running in the background for the first parts of > >> the job, > >> I looked at the `sort` command. I noticed from some online sources that > >> setting the environment variable LC_ALL=C improves speed for `sort`. > >> Could > >> this be set on the ProcessBuilder for the `sort` process? Could it > >> break/change something? I see the warning from the man page for `sort`. > >> > >> *** WARNING *** The locale specified by the environment affects > >> sort order. Set LC_ALL=C to get the traditional sort order that > >> uses native byte values. > > > > It shouldn't matter but, yes, better to set it and export it in the > > control script and propagate to forked processes. > > > > The sort is doing a binary sort except because it a text sort program, > > the binary is turned into hex (!!). hex is in the ASCII subset and > > shoule be locale safe. > > > > But better to set LC_ALL=C. > > > > Andy > > > > > >> > >> Links: > >> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/445233 > >> > https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/579251/how-to-use-parallel-to-speed-up-sort-for-big-files-fitting-in-ram > >> > >> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7074430/how-do-we-sort-faster-using-unix-sort > >> > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Øyvind > >> > -- --- Marco Neumann KONA

[jira] [Updated] (JENA-2216) Jena Fuseki GeoSPARQL fails to start

2021-12-15 Thread Marco Neumann (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Neumann updated JENA-2216: Summary: Jena Fuseki GeoSPARQL fails to start (was: Jena Fuseki GeoSPARQL) > Jena Fuseki GeoSPA

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-2216) Jena Fuseki GeoSPARQL

2021-12-15 Thread Marco Neumann (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17459737#comment-17459737 ] Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2216: - solution: remove exclusion from jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki

[jira] [Created] (JENA-2216) Jena Fuseki GeoSPARQL

2021-12-15 Thread Marco Neumann (Jira)
Marco Neumann created JENA-2216: --- Summary: Jena Fuseki GeoSPARQL Key: JENA-2216 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2216 Project: Apache Jena Issue Type: Bug Components

Re: Testing tdb2.xloader

2021-12-14 Thread Marco Neumann
t; Best regards, > Øyvind > > søn. 12. des. 2021 kl. 10:21 skrev Marco Neumann >: > > > Øyvind, looks like the above was the wrong log from a prior sharding > > experiment. > > > > This is the correct log file for the truthy dataset. > > > > http:/

Re: Error starting jena-fuseki-geosparql-4.4.0-SNAPSHOT.jar

2021-12-14 Thread Marco Neumann
-cmds is definitely missing during execution with the exclusion. This explains the error message. On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 9:57 AM Marco Neumann wrote: > Ok I will first investigate this a litte Andy. l think this might have > something to do with the logging change. The file size has obv

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >