phoebewang wrote:
> @tstellar Can a note be added somewhere about this? Folks upgrading to
> llvm-18.1.6 will get errors unless they drop -march=native if they were on
> 18.1.5
Although I agree we should add a note, I don't think this patch affects much.
The problem only coccurs when
@@ -109,16 +109,16 @@ CHECK-NEXT: 0x000e: [DW_RLE_offset_pair ]:
{{.*}}[0x[[RANGELIST_OFFSET_STAR
CHECK-NEXT: 0x0011: [DW_RLE_end_of_list ]
CHECK: .debug_names contents:
-CHECK-NEX:T Name Index @ 0x0 {
-CHECK-NEX:T Header {
-CHECK-NEX:T Length: 0x7C
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
// RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=asm -triple powerpc-ibm-aix-xcoff %s | FileCheck %s
-// CHECK-label: .csect .text[PR],2
klensy wrote:
actual: `.csect ..text..[PR],5`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91854
FireBurn wrote:
@tstellar Can a note be added somewhere about this? Folks upgrading to
llvm-18.1.6 will get errors unless they drop -march=native if they were on
18.1.5
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91694
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/AlexVlx edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88182
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AlexVlx commented:
> Please fix the commit message before you merge; otherwise LGTM
For the commit message I was thinking something along the following lines: `At
the moment, Clang is rather liberal in assuming that 0 (and by extension
unqualified) is always a safe
https://github.com/ftynse approved this pull request.
LGTM for the MLIR part. Please seek approval from relevant reviewers for all
other subprojects.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91857
___
cfe-commits mailing list
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ void foo18() {
// CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*a.*]] = getelementptr inbounds [[STRUCT_G]], ptr [[G]],
i32 0, i32 0
// CHECK-NEXT: store i32 2, ptr [[A]], align 4
// CHECK-NEXT: [[F:%.*f.*]] = getelementptr inbounds [[STRUCT_G]], ptr [[G]],
i32 0, i32 1
-//
rjodinchr wrote:
> > It has nothing to do with OpenMP. The goal was just to get something in the
> > llvm IR that we could check for. The `assume` attribute allows us to pass a
> > string that we can then check in a llvm pass.
>
> Could you investigate whether 'annotate' would do what you
yronglin wrote:
@zygoloid IIUC, since `CXXDefaultArgExpr` and `CXXDefaultInitExpr` were not
added to CFG before and were fall back to constant evaluation in ExprEngine,
they were not processed correctly in StaticAnalyzer.
In CFG:
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 23fe1fc6b78b7643a801ce3eb53d14b47b1dd0ff
6969f06f39363deda92d473ec14a08663c71f3b1 --
https://github.com/yronglin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91879
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87933
Clang now support the following:
- Extending lifetime of object bound to reference members of aggregates, that
are created from default member
https://github.com/yronglin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87933
>From 9fba6da7cb1ffbc7d46b69c6ac0cfd15a89c4b56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yronglin
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 01:38:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [Clang] Support lifetime extension of temporary created
by
https://github.com/yronglin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87933
>From 9fba6da7cb1ffbc7d46b69c6ac0cfd15a89c4b56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yronglin
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 01:38:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Clang] Support lifetime extension of temporary created
by
@@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ ABIArgInfo X86_32ABIInfo::classifyArgumentType(QualType Ty,
CCState ,
return ABIArgInfo::getDirect();
return ABIArgInfo::getExpand();
}
-return getIndirectResult(Ty, /*ByVal=*/false, State);
+return getIndirectResult(Ty,
https://github.com/phoebewang updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91846
>From 844fb5283d654d7d9cb68c5712b338f0a70b384e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Phoebe Wang
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 16:07:00 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [X86][vectorcall] Pass built types byval when xmm0~6
@@ -79,14 +79,14 @@ template struct Y2 {}; //
expected-note {{partial
template class U, typename... Z>
struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; };
template class U, typename... Z>
-struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; };
+struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; }; // expected-note {{partial
specialization matches
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-05-12T07:26:03+02:00
New Revision: 63224d717108d927e998da8a67050a6cc5dd74a2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/63224d717108d927e998da8a67050a6cc5dd74a2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/63224d717108d927e998da8a67050a6cc5dd74a2.diff
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91876
>From a4b877b240ede15260f08fcb4a4622dd45a13d0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 20:18:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [analyzer] Allow recursive functions to be trivial.
---
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 31774b6a8a88b435ce79f9ba048ef8bb00e2817e
a4b877b240ede15260f08fcb4a4622dd45a13d0a --
https://github.com/rniwa edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91876
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91876
>From a4b877b240ede15260f08fcb4a4622dd45a13d0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 20:18:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [analyzer] Allow recursive functions to be trivial.
---
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91876.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/PtrTypesSemantics.cpp
(+9-9)
- (modified)
https://github.com/rniwa created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91876
None
>From aac9ea105506ff933d773337f3260f7770a2c5e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 20:18:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [analyzer] Allow recurisve functions to be trivial.
---
@@ -1352,20 +1352,43 @@ static void AddParamAndFnBasicAttributes(const CallBase
,
auto = CalledFunction->getContext();
// Collect valid attributes for all params.
- SmallVector ValidParamAttrs;
+ SmallVector ValidObjParamAttrs, ValidExactParamAttrs;
bool
@@ -1352,20 +1352,43 @@ static void AddParamAndFnBasicAttributes(const CallBase
,
auto = CalledFunction->getContext();
// Collect valid attributes for all params.
- SmallVector ValidParamAttrs;
+ SmallVector ValidObjParamAttrs, ValidExactParamAttrs;
bool
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91875
>From d5a676c1cbe6d9804e6b2d3582df3c4977684188 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 16:59:27 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [alpha.webkit.UncountedCallArgsChecker] Allow explicit
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 31774b6a8a88b435ce79f9ba048ef8bb00e2817e
d5a676c1cbe6d9804e6b2d3582df3c4977684188 --
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91875.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/ASTUtils.cpp (+7)
-
https://github.com/rniwa created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91875
None
>From d5a676c1cbe6d9804e6b2d3582df3c4977684188 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 16:59:27 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [alpha.webkit.UncountedCallArgsChecker] Allow explicit
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh (VoltrexKeyva)
Changes
Fix an LLVM coding standards inconformity by adding pointer qualifiers to
`auto`-typed variables that deduce to pointer types.
See what the coding standards state
https://github.com/VoltrexKeyva created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91874
Fix an LLVM coding standards inconformity by adding pointer qualifiers to
`auto`-typed variables that deduce to pointer types.
See what the coding standards state
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91873
>From 433852bd5e360bcf0dfe41e401c3aa73f29a2092 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 16:45:56 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [analyzer] Treat break, continue, goto, and label
statements as
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 31774b6a8a88b435ce79f9ba048ef8bb00e2817e
433852bd5e360bcf0dfe41e401c3aa73f29a2092 --
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91873
>From 433852bd5e360bcf0dfe41e401c3aa73f29a2092 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 16:45:56 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [analyzer] Treat break, continue, goto, and label statements
as
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
Also allow CXXBindTemporaryExpr, which creates a temporary object with a
non-trivial destructor, and add a few more std and WTF functions to the
explicitly allowed list.
---
Full diff:
https://github.com/rniwa edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91873
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rniwa created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91873
Also allow CXXBindTemporaryExpr, which creates a temporary object with a
non-trivial desturctor, and add a few more std and WTF functions to the
explicitly allowed list.
>From
https://github.com/AlexVlx updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89796
>From 662f160418c704f45e57e751168903d774b74303 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Voicu
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 17:41:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Add initial support for AMDGCN flavoured SPIRV.
---
https://github.com/AlexVlx updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89796
>From 662f160418c704f45e57e751168903d774b74303 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Voicu
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 17:41:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Add initial support for AMDGCN flavoured SPIRV.
---
https://github.com/chrisnc updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91870
>From ef08eb6e2526c5d4f97dbcc42715ae5daf74de3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Copeland
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 00:15:50 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [ARM][clang] Fix warning for VFP function calls from
chrisnc wrote:
Here is an example of the existing warning in action.
https://godbolt.org/z/9e84EfeYP
It warns for calling a normal function, but the same function with an interrupt
attribute does not warn. The `subs pc, lr, 4` in `bar_irq` goes back to `bl
bar_irq`, creating an infinite loop,
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-05-11T15:23:35-07:00
New Revision: 0869204cff22831d0bb19a82c99bf85e4deb4ae3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0869204cff22831d0bb19a82c99bf85e4deb4ae3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0869204cff22831d0bb19a82c99bf85e4deb4ae3.diff
https://github.com/ivanmurashko closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91738
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ivan Murashko
Date: 2024-05-11T23:14:56+01:00
New Revision: 91c917b19f076b510635a6168305f6f0117e7fad
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/91c917b19f076b510635a6168305f6f0117e7fad
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/91c917b19f076b510635a6168305f6f0117e7fad.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Chris Copeland (chrisnc)
Changes
This warning has two issues:
- The interrupt attribute doesn't only change how volatile registers
are treated; it also causes the function to return using an exception
return instruction. This
https://github.com/chrisnc created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91870
This warning has two issues:
- The interrupt attribute doesn't only change how volatile registers
are treated; it also causes the function to return using an exception
return instruction. This warning
https://github.com/dmpolukhin approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91738
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dmpolukhin reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91738
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dmpolukhin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91738
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
e-kwsm wrote:
Commit message is updated/
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91857
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/e-kwsm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91858
>From 12e8ea6a0e104efbe130dd15d4d9051a7d86d50e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eisuke Kawashima
Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 00:06:53 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] fix(python): fix comparison to True/False
from PEP8
https://github.com/e-kwsm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91857
>From 7cec823d9a87b90bf8d9ae5c975f4492076e0abb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eisuke Kawashima
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 23:57:11 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] fix(python): fix comparison to None
from PEP8
tstellar wrote:
This was merged in another PR: b7e2397c54b7cddac8fa188e68073f78e895a57a.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90139
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+#define __counted_by(f) __attribute__((counted_by(f)))
+
+struct bar;
+
+struct not_found {
+ int count;
+ struct bar *fam[] __counted_by(bork); // expected-error {{use of undeclared
identifier 'bork'}}
+};
+
kees wrote:
> Consider this example. It tries to illustrate why putting `__counted_by()` on
> a pointer to a structs containing flexible array members doesn't make sense.
>
> ```c
> struct HasFAM {
> int count;
> char buffer[] __counted_by(count); // This is OK
> };
>
> struct
Author: Haojian Wu
Date: 2024-05-11T22:07:21+02:00
New Revision: 2b386888b78327db4906b12401e1a89438471548
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2b386888b78327db4906b12401e1a89438471548
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2b386888b78327db4906b12401e1a89438471548.diff
e-kwsm wrote:
> Why do we need to make this change?
The valid escape sequences in Python are listed
[here](https://docs.python.org/3/reference/lexical_analysis.html#escape-sequences):
`\t`, `\n`, etc.
Invalid ones fixed here seem to be used for regular expression,
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld
@llvm/pr-subscribers-platform-windows
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-driver
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
I'm planning to remove StringRef::equals in favor of
StringRef::operator==.
- StringRef::operator==/!= outnumber StringRef::equals
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91864
I'm planning to remove StringRef::equals in favor of
StringRef::operator==.
- StringRef::operator==/!= outnumber StringRef::equals by a factor of
276 under llvm-project/ in terms of their usage.
- The
ftynse wrote:
This should be included in the actual commit, not GitHub comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91857
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
e-kwsm wrote:
>From [PEP8](https://peps.python.org/pep-0008/#programming-recommendations):
> Comparisons to singletons like None should always be done with `is` or `is
> not`, never the equality operators.
[flake8](https://flake8.pycqa.org/en/latest/) is used here.
philnik777 wrote:
@AaronBallman Any thoughts on how we should proceed here?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86652
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Sirraide wrote:
I’d recommend just adding the tests to wherever the `[[assume]]` attribute is
already being tested; that’d be somewhere in `test/SemaCXX`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91841
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91844
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2024-05-11T11:38:52-07:00
New Revision: deffae5da123b32098914d8346bf4358a6792bdc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/deffae5da123b32098914d8346bf4358a6792bdc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/deffae5da123b32098914d8346bf4358a6792bdc.diff
ivanmurashko wrote:
@dmpolukhin , the test was successfully passed on MS Windows. There is the
corresponding record from the build log
```
_bk;t=1715380522596PASS: Clang :: Modules/implicit-module-no-timestamp.cpp
(12618 of 20053)
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91738
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-05-11T20:20:04+02:00
New Revision: 379b3cf653352f30f8c7cca393f4df9389be
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/379b3cf653352f30f8c7cca393f4df9389be
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/379b3cf653352f30f8c7cca393f4df9389be.diff
@@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ ABIArgInfo X86_32ABIInfo::classifyArgumentType(QualType Ty,
CCState ,
return ABIArgInfo::getDirect();
return ABIArgInfo::getExpand();
}
-return getIndirectResult(Ty, /*ByVal=*/false, State);
+return getIndirectResult(Ty,
azmat-y wrote:
Would I be correct in assuming that the test would be somewhat similar to this.
llvm-project/clang/test/Sema/unroll-template-value-crash.cpp
```
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++ -verify %s
// expected-no-diagnostics
template void foo() {
#pragma unroll Unroll
for (int i = 0; i <
tstellar wrote:
Two questions:
* Did you use a script to generate this patch?
* Why do we need to make this change?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91856
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ftynse wrote:
Please provide a proper patch description, i.e., why the change is being made.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91857
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91844
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jcsxky edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -79,14 +79,14 @@ template struct Y2 {}; //
expected-note {{partial
template class U, typename... Z>
struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; };
template class U, typename... Z>
-struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; };
+struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; }; // expected-note {{partial
specialization matches
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Eisuke Kawashima (e-kwsm)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91858.diff
18 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/tools/scan-build/bin/set-xcode-analyzer (+1-1)
- (modified) clang/utils/check_cfc/check_cfc.py
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you,
https://github.com/e-kwsm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91858
None
>From 1e31186c01024c63fa4c0bd378fec7131ce84d56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eisuke Kawashima
Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 00:06:53 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] fix(python): fix comparison to True/False
---
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-pgo
@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer
Author: Eisuke Kawashima (e-kwsm)
Changes
---
Patch is 35.05 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91857.diff
50 Files Affected:
- (modified)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Eisuke Kawashima (e-kwsm)
Changes
---
Patch is 35.05 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91857.diff
50 Files Affected:
- (modified)
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you,
https://github.com/e-kwsm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91857
None
>From c450df191a6b96591d7c7a7454b6e15cb925520f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eisuke Kawashima
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 23:57:11 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] fix(python): fix comparison to None
---
https://github.com/yronglin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90574
>From 1dcb4c3ac1efaf3a6a4317751e23089a6c8ccac1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yronglin
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:18:26 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] =?UTF-8?q?[Clang]=20Implement=20P3034R1=20Module=20?=
https://github.com/yronglin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90574
>From 1dcb4c3ac1efaf3a6a4317751e23089a6c8ccac1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yronglin
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:18:26 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] =?UTF-8?q?[Clang]=20Implement=20P3034R1=20Module=20?=
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Eisuke Kawashima (e-kwsm)
Changes
---
Patch is 120.87 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91856.diff
100 Files Affected:
- (modified)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Eisuke Kawashima (e-kwsm)
Changes
---
Patch is 120.87 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91856.diff
100 Files Affected:
- (modified)
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you,
@@ -9216,14 +9216,20 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
/// receive true if the cause for the error is the associated constraints of
/// the template not being satisfied by the template arguments.
///
+ /// \param PartialOrderTTP If true, assume these template
@@ -707,6 +707,7 @@ Bug Fixes to C++ Support
initialized, rather than evaluating them as a part of the larger manifestly
constant evaluated
expression.
- Fix a bug in access control checking due to dealyed checking of friend
declaration. Fixes (#GH12361).
+- When partial
@@ -6436,7 +6436,8 @@ bool Sema::CheckTemplateArgumentList(
TemplateArgumentListInfo , bool PartialTemplateArgs,
SmallVectorImpl ,
SmallVectorImpl ,
-bool UpdateArgsWithConversions, bool *ConstraintsNotSatisfied) {
+bool UpdateArgsWithConversions, bool
https://github.com/cor3ntin commented:
Looks sensible to me but let's wait a bit (I'll try to run tests on stdexec
with that change)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91833
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/cor3ntin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91833
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -109,16 +109,16 @@ CHECK-NEXT: 0x000e: [DW_RLE_offset_pair ]:
{{.*}}[0x[[RANGELIST_OFFSET_STAR
CHECK-NEXT: 0x0011: [DW_RLE_end_of_list ]
CHECK: .debug_names contents:
-CHECK-NEX:T Name Index @ 0x0 {
-CHECK-NEX:T Header {
-CHECK-NEX:T Length: 0x7C
https://github.com/klensy updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91854
>From 73dc4487a8a13a13f628857334afb25dcf2aa1f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: klensy
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 14:26:52 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] llvm: fix few typos in filecheck tests
clang: fix few typos in
@@ -6507,8 +6508,13 @@ bool Sema::CheckTemplateArgumentList(
bool PackExpansionIntoNonPack =
NewArgs[ArgIdx].getArgument().isPackExpansion() &&
(!(*Param)->isTemplateParameterPack() ||
getExpandedPackSize(*Param));
- if (PackExpansionIntoNonPack
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91833
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mikecrowe wrote:
@PiotrZSL wrote:
> Once build will pass, I will land this change, and fixes could be done in
> separate PR for both checks.
The build seems to be passing. Please can you land this if you are happy?
Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90397
https://github.com/5chmidti approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91400
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
dc03-work wrote:
Ah, looks like broken tests are being uncovered now. Awesome.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91854
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ entry:
}
; FIXME: Misspelled CHECK-LABEL
dc03-work wrote:
This FIXME can also be removed. Looking at the history of this file, looks like
something like this was attempted before:
1 - 100 of 429382 matches
Mail list logo
