Hi Gorry,
I think my main issues can be resolves with some smaller changes or
additions/removals. However, I still think that this document should not give
any recommendation what a network node or the transport must or should do. The
group has to decided on this, but I guess this would be a
On 6/12/2015 8:46 AM, go...@erg.abdn.ac.uk wrote:
Since we are already in WGLC, the WG Chairs probably will need to decide
the scope - if this is changed, I expect will anyway require a new WGLC.
Hopefully the new ID will help.
Here are my thoughts, with chair hat on.
It's an Informational
