[aqm] AQM plans

2016-02-10 Thread Wesley Eddy
Hello AQMers, this is just a quick note to be clear on working group status and forward planning. Currently, all of the active drafts are either in WGLC, or in the process of shepherd writeups to go the the AD. Once we get the current set of drafts out for publication, there are a few

Re: [aqm] status of PIE drafts WGLC

2016-02-10 Thread Wesley Eddy
On 1/22/2016 10:01 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote: Hello; the working group last call on the PIE drafts generated some emails, but I don't think I've seen any response from the editors. Specifically, there were a couple of emails with algorithm description questoins and technical comments from Rasool

Re: [aqm] status of PIE drafts WGLC

2016-02-10 Thread Wesley Eddy
On 2/10/2016 3:13 PM, Klatsky, Carl wrote: Wes, If the 'algorithm' drafts (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, and PIE) are targeted as Experimental, does that mean at some time later their status moves onto either PS (if real-world testing & use pans out) or Informational (if no activity further proves it out

Re: [aqm] status of PIE drafts WGLC

2016-02-10 Thread Klatsky, Carl
Wes, If the 'algorithm' drafts (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, and PIE) are targeted as Experimental, does that mean at some time later their status moves onto either PS (if real-world testing & use pans out) or Informational (if no activity further proves it out but the authors want to keep the info out