Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09.txt

2016-02-01 Thread Polina Goltsman
Dear Wesley, I apologize for the long delay. Below are responses to your emails regarding the draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines. On 22.01.16 15:50, Wesley Eddy wrote: On 12/7/2015 7:32 AM, Polina Goltsman wrote: In the

Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09.txt

2016-01-22 Thread Wesley Eddy
On 1/22/2016 2:17 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: On Jan 22, 2016, at 10:47 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote: I do also (personally) think that if there's a desire to go standards-track (rather than just experimental) with AQM algorithms, that having a fairly explicit evaluation of

Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09.txt

2016-01-22 Thread Klatsky, Carl
sley Eddy Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 9:51 AM To: aqm@ietf.org; Polina Goltsman Subject: Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09.txt On 12/7/2015 7:32 AM, Polina Goltsman wrote: In the abstract, the document says that it describes characterization guidelines for an AQM proposal, to de

Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09.txt

2016-01-22 Thread Dave Täht
The evaluation guide needs to be executable, or rather, turned into public code and a standardized benchmark suite. Eventually. Iteratively, flent has many tests that have proven valuable and quite a few that have not. The tests in the aqm guide, need to be created, iterated on, and examined.

Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09.txt

2016-01-22 Thread Wesley Eddy
On 1/22/2016 1:32 PM, Klatsky, Carl wrote: Wes and all, My comment is in regard to Polina’s comment “The WG currently has two AQMs (dropping/marking policy) in last call. Did someone evaluate these AQMs according to the specified guidelines?”. As I read over draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines,

Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09.txt

2016-01-22 Thread Fred Baker (fred)
On Jan 22, 2016, at 10:47 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote: > I do also (personally) think that if there's a desire to go standards-track > (rather than just experimental) with AQM algorithms, that having a fairly > explicit evaluation of the algorithms with regard to the guidelines

Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09.txt

2015-12-11 Thread Polina Goltsman
de* Polina Goltsman *Envoyé :* lundi 7 décembre 2015 13:32 *À :* Wesley Eddy; aqm@ietf.org *Cc :* Bless, Roland (TM) *Objet :* Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09.txt Dear all, Apologies for the long delay. I have review the latest version of the draft. In my opinion the docu

Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09.txt

2015-12-07 Thread Polina Goltsman
Envoyé : vendredi 27 novembre 2015 11:44 À : i-d-annou...@ietf.org Cc : aqm@ietf.org Objet : [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Active Queue Management and Packet

[aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09.txt

2015-11-27 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Active Queue Management and Packet Scheduling Working Group of the IETF. Title : AQM Characterization Guidelines Authors : Nicolas Kuhn

Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09.txt

2015-11-27 Thread Kuhn Nicolas
/msg09894.html -Message d'origine- De : aqm [mailto:aqm-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de internet-dra...@ietf.org Envoyé : vendredi 27 novembre 2015 11:44 À : i-d-annou...@ietf.org Cc : aqm@ietf.org Objet : [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09.txt A New Internet-Draft is available