Re: [aqm] status of PIE drafts WGLC

A new version (draft-ietf-aqm-docsis-pie-02) has been uploaded that addresses the idnits. Thanks, Greg On 2/4/16, 4:26 PM, "aqm on behalf of Greg White" wrote: >Thanks Wes. I should be able to get those taken care of in the next

Re: [aqm] status of PIE drafts WGLC

On 1/22/2016 10:01 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote: Hello; the working group last call on the PIE drafts generated some emails, but I don't think I've seen any response from the editors. Specifically, there were a couple of emails with algorithm description questoins and technical comments from Rasool

Re: [aqm] status of PIE drafts WGLC

On 2/10/2016 3:13 PM, Klatsky, Carl wrote: Wes, If the 'algorithm' drafts (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, and PIE) are targeted as Experimental, does that mean at some time later their status moves onto either PS (if real-world testing & use pans out) or Informational (if no activity further proves it out

Re: [aqm] status of PIE drafts WGLC

atus of PIE drafts WGLC On 1/22/2016 10:01 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote: > Hello; the working group last call on the PIE drafts generated some > emails, but I don't think I've seen any response from the editors. > Specifically, there were a couple of emails with algorithm description

Re: [aqm] status of PIE drafts WGLC

Thanks Wes. I should be able to get those taken care of in the next week or so. -Greg On 2/4/16, 11:33 AM, "aqm on behalf of Wesley Eddy" wrote: >Since none of the questions outstanding from WGLC seem to impact the >DOCSIS PIE draft

Re: [aqm] status of PIE drafts WGLC

Since none of the questions outstanding from WGLC seem to impact the DOCSIS PIE draft directly, I think that it is ready to move forward: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-docsis-pie/ Since it's describing what has already been done in DOCSIS, the Informational status seems

[aqm] status of PIE drafts WGLC

Hello; the working group last call on the PIE drafts generated some emails, but I don't think I've seen any response from the editors. Specifically, there were a couple of emails with algorithm description questoins and technical comments from Rasool Al-Saadi and Ilpo Jarvinen, both with