On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On 3/1/16, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> If they're aiming it at IoT products, which they seem to be doing:
>> 1) dedicated bandwidth to BT/WiFI
>> 2) more stable
>> 3) cheaper when on board
>> 4)
On 3/1/16, Peter Robinson wrote:
> If they're aiming it at IoT products, which they seem to be doing:
> 1) dedicated bandwidth to BT/WiFI
> 2) more stable
> 3) cheaper when on board
> 4) generally less problematic
>
>> Much more interesting, IMHO would be the addition of a
FYI, I reported this as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313480
-derek
Derek Atkins writes:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a Wandboard Quad running Fedora 22 (current as of yesterday).
> This box is a MythTV backend. It's also running an NFS server to serve
> the 2 TB Sata
#fedora-meeting-2: Fedora ARM and AArch64 Status Meeting
Meeting started by pwhalen at 16:01:27 UTC. The full logs are available
at
>> the wifi firmware (looks similar issues that people have with Apple
>> Mac wifi) isn't currently in linux-firmware so it's not (as far as
>> I'm aware) currently able to be distributed as part of Fedora.
>
> I'm not going to get into a discussion, I know why you don't like the
> Broadcom
On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 12:28 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> the wifi firmware (looks similar issues that people have with Apple
> Mac wifi) isn't currently in linux-firmware so it's not (as far as
> I'm aware) currently able to be distributed as part of Fedora.
I'm not going to get into a
On 01.03.2016 10:22, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Built-in WiFi, Bluetooth, 64 bit processor. Is this finally the Raspberry
> Pi
> that Fedora will run unmodified on? Sure hope so...
>>> At some point, I have to wonder if Raspberry Pi is just trolling us
>>> with each hardware release.
>>
unsubscribe
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 09:34 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> And for the wifi/BT chip if you google BCM43438 you'll see it's SDIO
> and I suspect if you look at all the BCM283x SoCs there's a spare
> MMC/SDIO interface hanging around somewhere.
Yes, the wifi is SDIO attached and a UART,
>> I just dont understand why they insist on having everything onboard
>> (specially wireless) when usb dongles for wifi and BT can be had for a
>> couple of dollars. Plus, having those EXTERNALLY means you can update
>> to newer specs without switching mainboard.
>
> I fully understand it.
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:03:39AM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> I just dont understand why they insist on having everything onboard
> (specially wireless) when usb dongles for wifi and BT can be had for a
> couple of dollars. Plus, having those EXTERNALLY means you can update
> to newer specs
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
> W dniu 01.03.2016 o 09:03, Fernando Cassia pisze:
>
>> I just dont understand why they insist on having everything onboard
>> (specially wireless) when usb dongles for wifi and BT can be had for a
>> couple of
W dniu 01.03.2016 o 09:03, Fernando Cassia pisze:
I just dont understand why they insist on having everything onboard
(specially wireless) when usb dongles for wifi and BT can be had for a
couple of dollars.
Much more interesting, IMHO would be the addition of a SATA port AND USB 3.0.
They
On 2/29/16, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 29 February 2016 at 05:28, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>>> Built-in WiFi, Bluetooth, 64 bit processor. Is this finally the Raspberry
>>> Pi
14 matches
Mail list logo