Re: [asterisk-users] German date format in voicemail emails

2009-01-27 Thread Johansson Olle E
27 jan 2009 kl. 01.14 skrev Tilghman Lesher: On Monday 26 January 2009 08:21:10 am Danny Nicholas wrote: Did you read the source for app_voicemail? Line 239 says you have to set locale in the config and have the sound file einE. Of course an easier way would be to locate the 19 day

Re: [asterisk-users] Can't start Asterisk after installing Digium G729 licence

2009-01-27 Thread Olivier
2009/1/27 Olivier oza-4...@myamail.com Hi, I carefully followed instructions in README file lasting with : /root/register ... blabla asterisk -r CLI restart now Then asterisk -r fails with : # asterisk -r Asterisk 1.6.1-beta4, Copyright (C) 1999 - 2008 Digium, Inc. and others. Created

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk-users Digest, Vol 54, Issue 83

2009-01-27 Thread niraj
Hi, How can view the list of RFCs and other drafts that asterisk supports? Basically I would like to know does asterisk supports RFC 3891? Thanks, Niraj Roy ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

[asterisk-users] server sizing for ~ 200 simultaneous call

2009-01-27 Thread nik600
Hi to all i'm planning the migration of a company on Asterisk, i have planned this scenario: 2 server with * 4 GB RAM * 2 CPU 64 bit dual core * RAID 1 * 2 network interfaces 1000 Mbit/s Each server will have a virtual interface that will be switched from one to the other in case of hardware

Re: [asterisk-users] server sizing for ~ 200 simultaneous call

2009-01-27 Thread Knud Müller
Am Dienstag, den 27.01.2009, 11:30 +0100 schrieb nik600: Hi to all i'm planning the migration of a company on Asterisk, i have planned this scenario: 2 server with * 4 GB RAM * 2 CPU 64 bit dual core * RAID 1 * 2 network interfaces 1000 Mbit/s Each server will have a virtual

[asterisk-users] Queue time to answer/abandon

2009-01-27 Thread Gabriel Ortiz Lour
Hi all, Is there a way to get the time that a specific queued call took to be answered or abandoned? Thanks, Gabriel Ortiz ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update

Re: [asterisk-users] server sizing for ~ 200 simultaneous call

2009-01-27 Thread Alex Balashov
If you use reinvites (the peers are all internal, right?), definitely. Without reinvites - maybe. On Jan 27, 2009, at 5:30 AM, nik600 nik...@gmail.com wrote: Hi to all i'm planning the migration of a company on Asterisk, i have planned this scenario: 2 server with * 4 GB RAM * 2 CPU 64

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk freezes with Fixup failed on channel SIP/...MASQ

2009-01-27 Thread Udo Schacht-Wiegand
Grygoriy, [...] A practice that was once described in the code comments as being nasty. thanks for your input. My knowledge of 'hard core' programming is limited, so I cannot judge on what is written on freeswitch.org. Though it sounds logical to me. But as I said, this is on a production

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk freezes with Fixup failed on channel SIP/...MASQ

2009-01-27 Thread Steve Davies
2009/1/27 Udo Schacht-Wiegand aster...@wiegand.name: Grygoriy, [...] A practice that was once described in the code comments as being nasty. thanks for your input. My knowledge of 'hard core' programming is limited, so I cannot judge on what is written on freeswitch.org. Though it sounds

[asterisk-users] G726 Codec

2009-01-27 Thread michel freiha
Dear Sir, I would like to ask please about how I can force asterisk to send all G726 codecs without translation... g723 gsm ulaw alaw g726aal2 adpcm slin lpc10 g729 speex ilbc g726 g722 g723- ---- -- -- -- -- gsm- -22

Re: [asterisk-users] I need help

2009-01-27 Thread Max Brooks
Bayardo Sanchez wrote: i have a problem need help == Spawn extension (DLPN_everything, 2095773777, 2) exited non-zero on 'SIP/8022-b7225740' -- Got SIP response 503 Service Unavailable back from 74.63.41.218 -- SIP/voipms4-09ab0c38 is circuit-busy == Everyone is busy/congested at

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue time to answer/abandon

2009-01-27 Thread Rayed Bs
SURE! you can use the manager event handler and a function dump_event! you can dump all kind off events to a text file or a database! I did it successfully! GOOD LUCK:) 2009/1/27 Gabriel Ortiz Lour ortiz.ad...@gmail.com Hi all, Is there a way to get the time that a specific queued call

Re: [asterisk-users] Reading/Writing the Astdb

2009-01-27 Thread cbbs70a
Thanks for the feedback, but unfortunately, there is still no joy. If I do this: echo -n database put FOO BAR 1 | socat STDIO UNIX-CONNECT:/var/run/asterisk/asterisk.ctl I get the following output on the command line: pbx-75/2395/1.4.20.1 pbx-75 is the hostname, 2395 is the PID of the

[asterisk-users] Webcall app needed

2009-01-27 Thread voip crazy
Hello all, I need to configure an application which let me to call from a web page. Someone has experience using apps to make webcalls? Which software do you use? Thanks. VoipCrazy. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

Re: [asterisk-users] Webcall app needed

2009-01-27 Thread Dean Collins
This conversation has been done to deathare archive search not available.? But the answers are www.mexuar.com www.phonefromhere.com and there are also a free open source versions but they take work on your part to setup. Regards, Dean Collins Cognation Inc d...@cognation.net

Re: [asterisk-users] I need help

2009-01-27 Thread Bayardo Sanchez
The problem is I have 20 agents calling all but 3 of them get this error when calling On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Max Brooks m...@legatio.com wrote: Bayardo Sanchez wrote: i have a problem need help == Spawn extension (DLPN_everything, 2095773777, 2) exited non-zero on

[asterisk-users] Asterisk - Nortel integration via SIP protocol

2009-01-27 Thread Pablo Bernasconi
Hi, I need to integrate my Asterisk with a Nortel Meridian 11, but I can´t use PRI, Analog lines, etc. It has to be via SIP protocol, and there is few information about this type of integration. Could someone please help me?? Thanks, Pablo ___ --

Re: [asterisk-users] I need help

2009-01-27 Thread Danny Nicholas
What is your call-limit set to in sip.conf? _ From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Bayardo Sanchez Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 9:12 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re:

[asterisk-users] SPA-3102 in India - Problem dialing out PTSN

2009-01-27 Thread Min Hwan Chang
Good morning, I've been having some problems getting the SPA-3102 working properly in India. Specific problem is that calls from the Asterisk server out the FXS port is failing. When trying to make calls, I'm getting this message: [Jan 26 23:00:31] NOTICE[2136]: chan_sip.c:13774

[asterisk-users] T.38

2009-01-27 Thread michel freiha
Dear All, I'm trying to send Fax using T.38 protocol but the FAX is not going through..I'm getting the following error om /var/log/messages [Jan 27 16:46:31] WARNING[25435] channel.c: No path to translate from SIP/80.169.210.181-0896bfd0(4) to SIP/028949469-b7703d40(256) [Jan 27 16:46:40]

[asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread Steve Edwards
The -user and -dev mailing lists are a valuable resource -- when they are not cluttered by posts unrelated to the charter of the lists. In my limited memory, this last weekend represents a new low in the relevant subject to noise ratio. Replying to requests with meaningless, misleading, or

Re: [asterisk-users] I need help

2009-01-27 Thread Bayardo Sanchez
24 chanels On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: What is your call-limit set to in sip.conf? -- *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Bayardo Sanchez

Re: [asterisk-users] I need help

2009-01-27 Thread Danny Nicholas
Is it the same 3 or the first 3? _ From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Bayardo Sanchez Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 9:58 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re:

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue time to answer/abandon + OrderlyStats Server Edition.

2009-01-27 Thread Matt King
Hi Gabriel, Yes this information is shown in real-time and also in historical reports with the OrderlyStats system. OrderlyStats is now available as a Server Edition you can download and install yourself, as well as the FREE managed service. You can get it at

Re: [asterisk-users] German date format in voicemail emails

2009-01-27 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 02:03:37 Johansson Olle E wrote: 27 jan 2009 kl. 01.14 skrev Tilghman Lesher: On Monday 26 January 2009 08:21:10 am Danny Nicholas wrote: Did you read the source for app_voicemail? Line 239 says you have to set locale in the config and have the sound file einE.

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 dahdi only?

2009-01-27 Thread Steve Gladden
New to Aserisk 1.6 and find the 'installation tutorials' seem low to non existent. You go to the main Asterisk page (digium.org) and really just old install instructions for 1.2 are in the examples. Download links only give you asterisk itself and not dahdi or libpri which also are needed to run

Re: [asterisk-users] T.38

2009-01-27 Thread David fire
check the codecs in sip.conf 2009/1/27 michel freiha mich...@gmail.com Dear All, I'm trying to send Fax using T.38 protocol but the FAX is not going through..I'm getting the following error om /var/log/messages [Jan 27 16:46:31] WARNING[25435] channel.c: No path to translate from

Re: [asterisk-users] I need help

2009-01-27 Thread Bayardo Sanchez
only 3 On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: Is it the same 3 or the first 3? -- *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Bayardo Sanchez *Sent:*

Re: [asterisk-users] Webcall app needed

2009-01-27 Thread David fire
search for the correlata thread there is a java applet work over iax so you will not have any problems whit the routers/firewalls nats and that stuff. at the end of the thread there is an example made by wolfgang. David 2009/1/27 Dean Collins d...@cognation.net This conversation has been done

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread David Gibbons
The higher you raise the barrier for entry to the mailing list, the more you decrease the amount good the mailing list is actually capable of doing. (barrier height is inversely related to how much help we can provide to the people that need help the most) I agree with you regarding the

Re: [asterisk-users] I need help

2009-01-27 Thread Danny Nicholas
Yes, but is it agents a,b,c or a,b,etc? If huey, dewey and louie always get in, but Donald never does, something may be wrong with how Donald is set up. _ From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Bayardo Sanchez Sent:

Re: [asterisk-users] T.38

2009-01-27 Thread Giorgio Incantalupo
Hi Michel, it seems there is a codec translation in between, have you tried to avoid it setting the codec from g729 to ulaw? I personally make Asterisk use alaw/ulaw codecs when sending faxes without any kind of codec translation and it seems to work. Giorgio michel freiha wrote: Dear All,

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 09:57:54 Steve Edwards wrote: The -user and -dev mailing lists are a valuable resource -- when they are not cluttered by posts unrelated to the charter of the lists. In my limited memory, this last weekend represents a new low in the relevant subject to noise ratio.

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 dahdi only?

2009-01-27 Thread Steve Gladden
I meant digium.com. Yay for messups! It's been one of those weeks. Really. New to Aserisk 1.6 and find the 'installation tutorials' seem low to non existent. You go to the main Asterisk page (digium.org) and really just old install instructions for 1.2 are in the examples. Download

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 dahdi only?

2009-01-27 Thread David fire
you can use any 1.4 how to but just use dahdi (both modules and tools) David 2009/1/27 Steve Gladden aster...@michiganbroadband.com I meant digium.com. Yay for messups! It's been one of those weeks. Really. New to Aserisk 1.6 and find the 'installation tutorials' seem low to non

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailinglists

2009-01-27 Thread Andrew Thomas
-- In many cases, this just isn't possible. While it would be nice to -- have all -- posts in the King's English, a great many users are in locales which -- don't King's English??? Anyway - to quote Ralph Wigham Me fail English? That's unpossible!.

Re: [asterisk-users] German date format in voicemail emails

2009-01-27 Thread Philipp Kempgen
Tilghman Lesher schrieb: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 02:03:37 Johansson Olle E wrote: Minivoicemail actually has - multiple e-mail formats - locale support so you get the date in local language and format. Unfortunately, it's using setlocale(3), which is not thread-safe. Note that

Re: [asterisk-users] Can't start Asterisk after installing Digium G729 licence [SOLVED]

2009-01-27 Thread Olivier
2009/1/27 Olivier oza-4...@myamail.com 2009/1/27 Olivier oza-4...@myamail.com Hi, I carefully followed instructions in README file lasting with : /root/register ... blabla asterisk -r CLI restart now Then asterisk -r fails with : # asterisk -r Asterisk 1.6.1-beta4, Copyright (C)

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread Robert Broyles
I think we'd be better off posting a regular FAQ, perhaps weekly, with some of these suggestions, as well as providing a link to that FAQ from the mailing list signup page, along with a STRONG suggestion to peruse the FAQ first. I agree with this 100% I'm still pretty new to the mailing

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread Mik Cheez
It seems to me that everything one may want to know would be contained on voip-info.org People don't ask stupid questions because of a lack of a FAQ to read, they ask stupid questions because they're too lazy do to the footwork. Robert Broyles wrote: I think we'd be better off posting a

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk - Nortel integration via SIP protocol

2009-01-27 Thread Eric Moniz
You will need to have a Nortel NRS server in your network. Sent from my iPhone Eric Moniz On Jan 27, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Pablo Bernasconi pbernasc...@isbel.com.uy wrote: Hi, I need to integrate my Asterisk with a Nortel Meridian 11, but I can ´t use PRI, Analog lines, etc. It has to be

Re: [asterisk-users] G726 Codec

2009-01-27 Thread Philipp Kempgen
michel freiha schrieb: I would like to ask please about how I can force asterisk to send all G726 codecs without translation... Huh? g723 gsm ulaw alaw g726aal2 adpcm slin lpc10 g729 speex ilbc g726 g722 g723- ---- -- -- -- --

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread Robert Broyles
I wouldn't say that voip-info.org has everything that a person would want to know. This is especially true of any recent changes to dialplan applications (and their available options) Voip-info.org is a great place to start, and often you will find an answer there. But not always. People are

[asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Michael Higgins
Folks -- First, apologies for not lurking for weeks or months to get the culture of the list. I read the recent post about improvement to the quality of posts with some amusement and full agreement. The problem is a big and very real one. I hope I'm not deepening it. But my question isn't

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 dahdi only?

2009-01-27 Thread Noah Miller
Hi Steve - New to Aserisk 1.6 and find the 'installation tutorials' seem low to non existent. Welcome to Open Source! Seriously, look at the README files accompanying asterisk, dahdi, and libpri. They will give you compilation/installation instructions. You can also search this list with

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Jon Pounder
Michael Higgins wrote: At least here in Canada - DSL just seems to have killed BRI - you practically have to know the secret handshake to even be allowed to provision one any more. It killed it as an internet transport which was its most widespread use, however its many benefits as a digital

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 dahdi only?

2009-01-27 Thread Barry L. Kline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Gladden wrote: Is 1.6 so cutting edge that I should not expect to find complete documentation (yet)like I seem to be expecting very easily? Most of what is applicable to 1.4 is applicable to 1.6. I'm running 1.6 without any hiccups -- YMMV.

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread Noah Miller
It seems to me that everything one may want to know would be contained on voip-info.org Hmm. Dangerous statement. There are many things on the WIKI that are quite outdated, and a great many other things that aren't there at all. People don't ask stupid questions because of a lack of a FAQ

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Jerry Jones
Instead you could always get a SIP/IAX provider. On Jan 27, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Jon Pounder wrote: Michael Higgins wrote: At least here in Canada - DSL just seems to have killed BRI - you practically have to know the secret handshake to even be allowed to provision one any more. It killed

[asterisk-users] Muted sound on a Linksys 962

2009-01-27 Thread James Lamanna
Hi, One of our customers has an issue with the callee not being able to hear them. It seems to happen very frequently on one number in particular where there are about 3 IVR menus to dial through before getting to a live person. However, this does not happen on every call. Running tcpdump on the

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailinglists

2009-01-27 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 10:46:40 Andrew Thomas wrote: -- In many cases, this just isn't possible. While it would be nice to -- have all -- posts in the King's English, a great many users are in locales which -- don't King's English??? I would have said Queen's English, but that

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 09:49:41AM -0800, Michael Higgins wrote: What I did find left me with the impression that USA 'BRI', uh, '2B1Q' protocol(?) is not supported by *any* hardware vendor, at all, period, nor is it tested and proved in the software... stack(?), in one related branch or

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 dahdi only?

2009-01-27 Thread Wilton Helm
New to Aserisk 1.6 and find the 'installation tutorials' seem low to non existent. I first looked at * about four months ago and rapidly came to the same conclusion. Even with the O-Reilly book, which I purchased in paper, although it is freely downloadable, I feel there is a huge dearth of

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread Wilton Helm
It seems to me that everything one may want to know would be contained on voip-info.org My own experience is that it covers a very broad spectrum (far broader than Asterisk) and in a rather terse manner. I have spent an hour or two at a time pouring over a topic there and come away little

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Wilton Helm
I'm in the same boat and have been looking at this for several months, but haven't actually jumped in, hands-on, yet. No, I don't think the situation is as dismal as you paint it, although the lack of appropriate marketing for BRI in the US has all but killed it here, making it relatively

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread Mik Cheez
If you find something on a WIKI that is outdated, guess what you have an opportunity to do . . . Noah Miller wrote: It seems to me that everything one may want to know would be contained on voip-info.org Hmm. Dangerous statement. There are many things on the WIKI that are quite

Re: [asterisk-users] German date format in voicemail emails

2009-01-27 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 10:54:37 Philipp Kempgen wrote: Tilghman Lesher schrieb: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 02:03:37 Johansson Olle E wrote: Minivoicemail actually has - multiple e-mail formats - locale support so you get the date in local language and format. Unfortunately,

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of themailinglists

2009-01-27 Thread Danny Nicholas
We all need the Univeral Language translators from Star Trek. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tilghman Lesher Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 12:42 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -

Re: [asterisk-users] Muted sound on a Linksys 962

2009-01-27 Thread Danny Nicholas
This worked for me Exten = s,1,Answer() Exten = s,n,Dial(Zap/g1/w5551212) What happens is that * doesn't go full duplex until it does a Native Bridge. The Answer Command creates a temporary bridge until the real one can take effect. -Original Message- From:

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 dahdi only?

2009-01-27 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:24:38AM -0700, Wilton Helm wrote: New to Aserisk 1.6 and find the 'installation tutorials' seem low to non existent. I first looked at * about four months ago and rapidly came to the same conclusion. Even with the O-Reilly book, which I purchased in paper,

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread Ira
At 09:30 AM 1/27/2009, you wrote: People are always going to ask stupid questions. For me it's not so much the stupid questions as the expectations that we're here to solve their problems according to their needs. If that continues to happen and the noise level gets high enough those that have

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 dahdi only?

2009-01-27 Thread Julian Lyndon-Smith
Wilton Helm wrote: [snip] My conclusion after installing a worthless * demo (that actually does allow two SIPs to talk to each other) is that Asterisk is not of any value to anyone other than a person who makes a full time career out of running Asterisk systems. I've installed and

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread SIP
Ira wrote: At 09:30 AM 1/27/2009, you wrote: People are always going to ask stupid questions. For me it's not so much the stupid questions as the expectations that we're here to solve their problems according to their needs. If that continues to happen and the noise level gets

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 dahdi only?

2009-01-27 Thread Jeff LaCoursiere
Wilton Helm wrote: [snip] My conclusion after installing a worthless * demo (that actually does allow two SIPs to talk to each other) is that Asterisk is not of any value to anyone other than a person who makes a full time career out of running Asterisk systems. I've installed and

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Wilton Helm
To the best of my understanding, latest Asterisk should support it through chan_dahdi . No need for extra bristuff or whatever. But this needs some testing. Any chance I could get some information on how to set it up and use it (keeping in mind that I have limited Asterisk experience and no

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 dahdi only?

2009-01-27 Thread Wilton Helm
Thanks for the reply. I have looked at the links you provided and I think they will be useful. I may have some issues with drivers for the HFC, but I guess I won't know until I try it. Wilton ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 dahdi only?

2009-01-27 Thread Wilton Helm
YMMV. Mine certainly did. For the better. My comments were more negative than I intended. My installation is worthless at this point because it is only a cookbook example and I haven't tried to modify it to meet my needs. I didn't intend to imply that Asterisk is worthless, just that I've

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Karl Fife
I wonder if BRI would have gotten traction if it offered PRI functionality (DID's and aggregation of multiple spans). Even TODAY I would drop many of my sip trunks for such hypothetical BRI trunks for locations where a full PRI is too much capacity. That's the bane of the PRI: Welcome to

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread Jared Smith
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 10:13 -0700, Robert Broyles wrote: I'm still pretty new to the mailing lists myself. I don't consider myself a novice Asterisk user, but one of my biggest 'complaints' is the lack of a well documented FAQ or Manual for Asterisk. Asterisk is truly an open-source

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 dahdi only?

2009-01-27 Thread Markus A. Wipfler
On Jan 27, 2009, at 10:50 PM, Wilton Helm wrote: YMMV. Mine certainly did. For the better. My comments were more negative than I intended. My installation is worthless at this point because it is only a cookbook example and I haven't tried to modify it to meet my needs. I didn't intend

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailinglists

2009-01-27 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
On 1/27/09, Tilghman Lesher tilgh...@mail.jeffandtilghman.com wrote: I would have said Queen's English, but that evokes Freddy Mercury. ...and Freddy Mercury evokes Kevin Fleming. Perfect - we're back on topic! -- Kristian Kielhofner http://blog.krisk.org http://www.submityoursip.com

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread David Gibbons
How pompous are we now? What happened to the 'open source community'? There's a give and take involved; you answer questions you know how to answer in the hopes that someone with greater experience and knowledge of the software will answer your questions. Yikes. -Original Message-

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 dahdi only?

2009-01-27 Thread Wilton Helm
I'm impressed that you picked up 6502 assembly out of an even larger vaccum considering there was no 'net back then to help at all. Did you install a PBX on an Atari? No, I interfaced a Rockwell AIM to a 300 station Philips electromechanical PABX (designed and built about 100 interface cards,

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 dahdi only?

2009-01-27 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:50:42PM -0700, Wilton Helm wrote: I just got a very nice posting from Tzafir showing me a web domain I didn't even know existed. It only includes documentation generated by 'make docs' . And is actually linked from the README itself. I'm not abandoning it by any

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Wilton Helm
I wonder if BRI would have gotten traction if it offered PRI functionality I can't say for sure, and don't even know the differences in functionality, but you may be right. When I last ordered DID I couldn't justify PRI so brought it in as analog. At that point in time and with that LEC PRI

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Steve Totaro
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Michael Higgins li...@evolone.org wrote: Folks -- First, apologies for not lurking for weeks or months to get the culture of the list. I read the recent post about improvement to the quality of posts with some amusement and full agreement. The problem is a

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 dahdi only?

2009-01-27 Thread Wilton Helm
It actually does contain references of all applicaitons, CLI commands, and such. Where? I saw some examples, but I've never found an organized list of commands. I'd love it. Wilton ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 03:45:34PM -0500, Steve Totaro wrote: Get a hold of Marcin Pyco (Former Digium Employee and extrememly smart guy. He has code/patches for zaptel to US BRIs work that include SPID as a variable in zap confs. Could you please expand on that point? Why should such

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Jon Pounder
Steve Totaro wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Michael Higgins li...@evolone.org wrote: Folks -- First, apologies for not lurking for weeks or months to get the culture of the list. I read the recent post about improvement to the quality of posts with some amusement and full

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread Robert Broyles
Jared Smith wrote: On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 10:13 -0700, Robert Broyles wrote: I'm still pretty new to the mailing lists myself. I don't consider myself a novice Asterisk user, but one of my biggest 'complaints' is the lack of a well documented FAQ or Manual for Asterisk.

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Michael Higgins
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:43:30 +0200 Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote: To the best of my understanding, latest Asterisk should support it through chan_dahdi . Cool. Got any links to any related informations, so I can go by more than anonymous hearsay? '-) No need for extra

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Michael Higgins
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:44:12 -0700 Wilton Helm wh...@compuserve.com wrote: I'm in the same boat and have been looking at this for several months, but haven't actually jumped in, hands-on, yet. No, I don't think the situation is as dismal as you paint it, although the lack of appropriate

Re: [asterisk-users] Muted sound on a Linksys 962

2009-01-27 Thread James Lamanna
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:50:36 -0600 From: Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Muted sound on a Linksys 962 To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Message-ID: a8d2ef23f63b4a42b264bb151c5d6...@db0005

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Michael Higgins
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:56:46 -0500 Jon Pounder j...@inline.net wrote: I barked up the same tree you are barking for a while and just gave up - lots of you could buy this and try it, but no proven solution. That's exactly what I've come up with. Thanks for your reply. I don't see anything

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 dahdi only?

2009-01-27 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:05:57 Wilton Helm wrote: It actually does contain references of all applicaitons, CLI commands, and such. Where? I saw some examples, but I've never found an organized list of commands. I'd love it. For applications, Appendix B, and for dialplan functions,

Re: [asterisk-users] Dahdi Init script for Suse?

2009-01-27 Thread Joshua Kinard
Doesn't look like SuSE is that evolved just yet. I poked at a few other init scripts in /etc/init.d, and they're all pretty much in the format of: echo -n Starting something ... command rc_status -v Some of the init scripts are downright horrific in their design because of this. I would

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Michael Higgins
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:27:04 -0600 Jerry Jones jjo...@danrj.com wrote: Instead you could always get a SIP/IAX provider. Can you please elaborate as to how this answers my question? Would getting a SIP/IAX provider be the same as getting a working 'BRI' ISDN line coming into the machine and

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 12:35:15 Wilton Helm wrote: It seems to me that everything one may want to know would be contained on voip-info.org My own experience is that it covers a very broad spectrum (far broader than Asterisk) and in a rather terse manner. I have spent an hour or two at a

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread Jai Rangi
** I understand. As someone else already mentioned, Voip-Info.org is for more than just Asterisk. Perhaps if we created a single source that was just for Asterisk...where everyone could contribute towards making the documentation better. I would be very interested in helping sponsoring

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists

2009-01-27 Thread Mik Cheez
Don't over think this, guys. Again, the point of having a WIKI is to allow for customization. A landing page for Asterisk documentation within voip-info.org is all you need, not a whole new source of documentation. Jai Rangi wrote: ** I understand. As someone else already

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Steve Totaro
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 03:45:34PM -0500, Steve Totaro wrote: Get a hold of Marcin Pyco (Former Digium Employee and extrememly smart guy. He has code/patches for zaptel to US BRIs work that include SPID as a

[asterisk-users] dialstatus through a call file

2009-01-27 Thread Pascal Bruno
Hello, Is it possible to retrieve the DIALSTATUS variable when placing call through a call file. This variable is set when using the Dial() application from the dialplan, but I am using a call file for my current application and need to get the dialstatus. Thank you.

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Eric Fort
On 1/27/09, Steve Totaro stot...@totarotechnologies.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 03:45:34PM -0500, Steve Totaro wrote: Get a hold of Marcin Pyco (Former Digium Employee and extrememly smart guy. He has

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Michael Graves
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:49:41 -0800, Michael Higgins wrote: snip It seems to me that there a lot of it ought to work or could be made to to work associated with implementing US BRI into Asterisk. That being the case what's called for is someone to try it, just to prove the point. Over the past

[asterisk-users] Module res_odbc is not loading

2009-01-27 Thread Pascal Bruno
Hi, I have remove the comment defor res_odbc.so and res_config_odbc.so in my modules.conf, but the module is still not loading when I do: module show like odbc I have o module returned anybody knows why? ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Wilton Helm
Rather, can you tell me who claims to support what hardware, so I can confirm? I don't have any notes on what I did. It was a bunch of Google searches. I seem to recall that Digium themselves made a two port BRI that would work. Eicon has some well respected products that I am pretty sure

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 dahdi only?

2009-01-27 Thread Wilton Helm
Thanks for engaging with me on this. I picked up the book and I see what you mean about Appendix B. I had under-appreciated it probably because of a paradigm shift I need to make. I think you meant Appendix E rather than F for dialplan. I still am not quite on the same page with you,

Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailinglists

2009-01-27 Thread Wilton Helm
There are far better resources out there for teaching Linux newbies. Instead, voip-info.org attempts to provide the sorts of information that is useful for those already familiar with Linux I can appreciate that. And I can appreciate being at the other end of the pipe, as I like to gloss over

Re: [asterisk-users] USA BRI -- any hope at all?

2009-01-27 Thread Wilton Helm
I'm with you on this. A VoIP trunking solution is never going to equal a LEC PSTN solution. It may be adequate for some purposes, but I'm not about to dump my BRI for a pair of IP numbers. The trade-offs aren't worth the small cost savings for me. Just the packetized delays (not to mention

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 dahdi only?

2009-01-27 Thread Julian Lyndon-Smith
Wilton Helm wrote: Thanks for engaging with me on this. I picked up the book and I see what you mean about Appendix B. I had under-appreciated it probably because of a paradigm shift I need to make. I think you meant Appendix E rather than F for dialplan. I still am not quite on the

  1   2   >