Amazon instances are shared resources. I wouldn't want to count on
timing or disk throughput, and you can't just ask them to do ssd - its
a virtual machine! 500 simultaneous recordings is a hefty load, and I
would want to know that the underlying hardware is dedicated to the task.
Sure
Digital ocean offers ssd on all the virtual machines. Uptime is good.
Jai Rangi
Www.didforsale.com
www.cebodtelecom.com
www.cebod.com
On Mar 8, 2015, at 8:11 AM, Jeff LaCoursiere j...@jeff.net wrote:
Amazon instances are shared resources. I wouldn't want to count on timing or
disk
As you've probably discovered, most of the API toolkits are half baked and
poorly maintained. The Java interface is not great for performance and is
suffering from the above too.
From our experience (including customer specific and commercial apps) using
the AMI directly is the best way to
Hi all,
currently we're looking to program a new asterisk application. Years ago
we used AMI and Asterisk Java.
When we did this we pretty soon encountered performance issues when
using a lot of channels.
We want to place calls, bridge channels, disconnect channels, monitor
them, hangup.
Still a shared resource. I don't see the benefit.
Even beyond the shared resource bit, with the kind of IO you are likely
to be pushing, you will want a decent NAS with lots of spindles and
fibre channel to your hosts.
j
On 03/08/2015 10:51 AM, Jai Rangi wrote:
Digital ocean offers ssd
Markus Weiler wrote:
Hi all,
Kia ora,
currently we're looking to program a new asterisk application. Years ago
we used AMI and Asterisk Java.
When we did this we pretty soon encountered performance issues when
using a lot of channels.
We want to place calls, bridge channels, disconnect
Agreed, network will be bottleneck even with ssd on shared resource. For a
stable env having a dedicated hosted server will be the best approach and
cheaper too.
Jai Rangi
Www.didforsale.com
www.cebodtelecom.com
www.cebod.com
On Mar 8, 2015, at 9:10 AM, Jeff LaCoursiere j...@jeff.net wrote:
