What about python scapy to generate bogus packets ?
Saverio
Il 08/dic/2015 18:01, "Dave Taht" ha scritto:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Jernej Kos wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > On 07. 12. 2015 17:14, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> >> Yes, that's expected.
So why they switched to babel ?
babel makes some magic with MTU ?
I dont see the end of the story.
Il 08/ago/2015 04:47, Jenny Ryan tunabana...@gmail.com ha scritto:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Marc Juul j...@labitat.dk
Date: Aug 6, 2015 9:58 AM
Subject: Why we switched to
Thanks for clarify :) The initial email was confusing.
I hope to be again at the battlemesh next year.
Have fun and send my greetings to all.
Saverio
Il 08/ago/2015 13:17, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr
ha scritto:
Hi Saverio, long time no hear. Pity you're not here.
So
Does that mean that the packages are also included in openwrt snapshot builds
automatically? What about OpenWrt releases: will a snapshot be captured and
branched, as it has been done for AA 12.09?
yes, correct ! it will be included in the snapshot builds
moreover at the moment you can commit
1. How much do the set of OLSR prefixes and the set and Babel prefixes
intersect?
there is no intersection
2. Do routers redistribute from OLSR to Babel or vice versa or both?
both
3. Do you intend blocking all prefixes originated by specific Babel speakers
or rather just some specific
I still don't understand. Are the Babel and OLSR prefixes not
distinct? Can't you simply discard the OLSR prefix(es) in Babel?
Different OLSR domains interconnected by a single babeld domain.
Some OLSR domain might have more than 1 border router.
Saverio
Hello,
if I have a network where my IGP protocol is babel, there is anyway to
make babel speak to a BGP daemon (quagga) to have a consistent BGP and
IGP routing ?
there is anything similar to the olsrd quagga plugin ?
thanks
Saverio
___
Babel-users
Thinking about that some further -- I'd like to hear more about what
you're trying to do, since I'm not absolutely convinced that
network-layer multicast is what you want to be using. (An
application-layer protocol might be more suitable, such as the flooding
algorithm used by AHCP, or even
To stir things even more: why not Mercurial? ;-)
olsr moved from mercurial to git :)
Saverio
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
Git! Git! Git! Git! Git!
you are so young :)
Saverio
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
Do you know if Babel supports aliases interfaces like eth0:0 or eth0:1?
I want to know someone who can confirm he is using it.
I think this is the way we used babel at the wbmv3 ! am I wrong ?
Saverio
___
Babel-users mailing list
Hello,
I'm trying to test (again) AHCP on OpenWRT.
I say again because I used AHCP in a little testebed about 18 months
ago. The configuration was in a .dat file living in:
/usr/lib/ahcp/ahcp.dat
and it was only IPv6, and it was completely stateless without server/clients.
It all worked very
12 matches
Mail list logo