Third of Americans Say Evidence Has Supported Darwin's Evolution Theory

2004-11-19 Thread Mark A. Foster
What a country! GALLUP POLL NEWS SERVICE SOCIAL ISSUES POLICY Third of Americans Say Evidence Has Supported Darwin's Evolution Theory Only about a third of Americans believe that Charles Darwin's theory of evolution is a scientific theory that has been well supported by the evidence, while

structurizationism

2004-11-19 Thread Richard H. Gravelly
Mark, you wrote: I am puzzled by the highlighted phrase. * The statement, God is love, could be rephrased, God is His Will. For us, in accordance with divine command theory, goodness refers to the divine Will, *wholly dependent on God, not to His Essence.* Whatever God wills is, by definition,

Re: history-centric and non-history-centric religions

2004-11-19 Thread Mark A. Foster
Ron, At 11:06 AM 11/19/2004, you wrote: I think the Baha’i Faith, as most Baha’is seem to understand it, is a history-centric religion, like Islam and Christianity. I agree with that. Unfortunately, the paper was, IMO, very poorly written and organized. The writer kept on repeating himself,

Re: Third of Americans Say Evidence Has Supported Darwin's Evolution Theory

2004-11-19 Thread Richard H. Gravelly
- Original Message - From: Mark A. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Baha'i Studies [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 7:00 AM Subject: Third of Americans Say Evidence Has Supported Darwin's Evolution Theory What a country! Hooray for unity in diversity! Richard.

Re: The Divine Command Theory of Ethics

2004-11-19 Thread Mark A. Foster
Richard, At 01:43 PM 11/19/2004, you wrote: For all of that, I am puzzled about the distinction you appear to make between God and His Essence. Where do you mean? Mark A. Foster * http://markfoster.net Sacred cows make the best hamburger -- Mark Twain and Abbie Hoffman

Re: structurizationism

2004-11-19 Thread Mark A. Foster
Richard, Never mind. I see what you are referring to. At 11:48 AM 11/19/2004, you wrote: *The statement, God is love, could be rephrased, God is His Will. For us, in accordance with divine command theory, goodness refers to the divine Will, *wholly dependent on God, not to His Essence.*

Re: The Divine Command Theory of Ethics

2004-11-19 Thread Richard H. Gravelly
Where do you mean? I am referring to the portion between the asterisks. The statement, God is love, could be rephrased, God is His Will. For us, in accordance with divine command theory, goodness refers to the divine Will, *wholly dependent on God, not to His Essence.* Whatever God wills is, by

Re: structurizationism

2004-11-19 Thread Mark A. Foster
Hi, Richard, At 02:24 PM 11/19/2004, you wrote: And this is because we can know nothing of His Essence? Not exactly. The classical realists, following Plato, made forms a part of God's nature. The form for a person, a cat, a dog, or a tree was a fixed universal in the Mind of God. As a result,

Re: structurizationism

2004-11-19 Thread Richard H. Gravelly
- Original Message - From: Mark A. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Baha'i Studies [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 1:56 PM Subject: Re: structurizationism Hi, Richard, At 02:24 PM 11/19/2004, you wrote: And this is because we can know nothing of His Essence? Not exactly.

Re: structurizationism

2004-11-19 Thread Mark A. Foster
Hi, Richard, At 04:39 PM 11/19/2004, you wrote: Or is it that His Will emanates from His Essence in your opinion? I would say manifests in this case. Mark A. Foster * http://markfoster.net Sacred cows make the best hamburger -- Mark Twain and Abbie Hoffman

Re: structurizationism

2004-11-19 Thread Richard H. Gravelly
- Original Message - From: Mark A. Foster Subject: Re: structurizationism Hi, Richard, At 04:39 PM 11/19/2004, you wrote: Or is it that His Will emanates from His Essence in your opinion? I would say manifests in this case. In your structurizationism system do emanations manifest as

history-centric and non-history-centric religions

2004-11-19 Thread Richard H. Gravelly
Mark, is there any validity to the statement below? When they gleefully quote that church attendance is down in the US, they fail to consider that home based Christian prayer groups have replaced church going in many communities across America, and such groups now represent a major component of

Re: structurizationism

2004-11-19 Thread Richard H. Gravelly
In your structurizationism system do emanations manifest as particulars? If you mean emanations from God, I would say yes. For instance, each soul is an emanation from God. The soul manifests itself as a body. What human structurization could be named or labeled 'emanation'?

Re: Third of Americans Say Evidence Has Supported Darwin's Evolution Theory

2004-11-19 Thread Patti Goebel
A third of Americans are biblical literalists who believe that the Bible is the actual word of God and is to be taken literally, word for word. Mark, You are probably already aware of this, but if not: . . . our sufficiency is of God; 3:6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the new

Re: history-centric and non-history-centric religions

2004-11-19 Thread Mark A. Foster
Hi, Richard, At 07:30 PM 11/19/2004, you wrote: When they gleefully quote that church attendance is down in the US, they fail to consider that home based Christian prayer groups have replaced church going in many communities across America, and such groups now represent a major component of

Re: structurizationism

2004-11-19 Thread Mark A. Foster
Richard, At 07:38 PM 11/19/2004, you wrote: What human structurization could be named or labeled 'emanation'? IMO, emanation is a divine structurization for the particulars, the created beings, which God emanates. Mark A. Foster * http://markfoster.net Sacred cows make the best hamburger --

RE: Third of Americans Say Evidence Has Supported Darwin's Evolution Theory

2004-11-19 Thread Ruth Fair Leeb
National Geographic Magazine has a good issue on Darwin this monthruthie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patti Goebel Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 6:56 PM To: Baha'i Studies Subject: Re: Third of Americans Say Evidence Has Supported

Re: Third of Americans Say Evidence Has Supported Darwin's Evolution Theory

2004-11-19 Thread Mark A. Foster
Patti, At 08:32 PM 11/19/2004, you wrote: There is good evidence that people have been getting Paul wrong (taking him and the Gospels literally) since the early days of the Christian Church: IMO, the problem with much of Christendom is not taking Paul literally. It is taking most of what Paul

Re: Third of Americans Say Evidence Has Supported Darwin's Evolution Theory

2004-11-19 Thread Mark A. Foster
Patti, At 08:56 PM 11/19/2004, you wrote: We can only hope; however, I think the success could be in danger if some people have their way: http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/11/12/ga.evolution.ap/index.html Well, if the Supreme Court gets stacked with Constitutional constructionists, who are, in