differences.
regards,
Christian.
--
---
Christian E. Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Bud Dean, here he is not interpreting the word of God, but the word of
Nabil. Not that he doesn't have additional insight, mind you, but I
think the thrust of it is the fact that Nabil isn't scripture, so his
translation/interpretation/interpolation may not partake in his
infallibility.
Something can be both sacred mythology and factually true. Myth may
imply false or innacurate or made up in the common vernacular, but
parables are myths, and the Qur'an and Bible both clearly state that
they are speaking in parables. If some of the parables happen to be
true (ie, Jesus knew
Good thing, then, that neither Mr. Martin nor Mr. Cole are authoritative. ;)
cheers,
Christian.
Richard H. Gravelly wrote:
I believe that it was Juan Cole who said he said that. I'll check.
- Original Message -
From: Arthur Kendall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...Doug Martin. Didn't he
