In bah'view a homosexual is a "sick heterosexual" or "perturbed heterosexual". So "change of sex" doesnt exist.http://hasaneliasperu.blogspot.com/
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent
PROTECTED] wrote:In bahá'íview a homosexual is a "sick heterosexual" or "perturbed heterosexual". So "change of sex" doesnt exist. http://hasaneliasperu.blogspot.com/ The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-m
.
Unfortunately, these are rigid categories, and I think that the thread
of this discussion addresses that there is a lot of area that is
difficult to define.
Yours,
Jeanine
Hasan Elias wrote:
In bah'view a homosexual is a "sick
heterosexual" or "perturbed heterosexual"
Huh?
- Original Message -
From: Hasan Elias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, November 1, 2006 4:33 am
Subject: change of sex?
To: Baha'i Studies bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
In bahá'í view a homosexual is a sick heterosexual or perturbed
heterosexual. So change of sex doesn't exist
I think Shi`ah consider the `ismah (infallibility) of `ali, Fatimih,
Imam Hasan, Imam Husayn, etc., etc. on par with the infallibility of
the Prophet Muhammad. I guess the Shaykhi school adopts a very
extremist view of the exalted station of imams. But I think
Baha'u'llah does
not
accept
I found this helpful from John Hick
With grateful thanks to him and to the site:
http://mind.ucsd.edu/syllabi/02-03/01w/readings/hick.html
[1] As well as the majority report of the Augustinian tradition, which
has dominated Western Christendom, both Catholic and Protestant, since the
time of
Another memorable post for the hall of fame of rubbish and non-sensical
comments.
Iskandar
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Gilberto Simpson wrote:
On 10/27/05, Susan Maneck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How did they change? (I don't mean, what was the change?, I mean
What was the process by which
of such an action. But that's not the route Bahais
take. Instead Bahais tend to argue that it was under a different law
and a different situation, as if the moral value of a human life was
different now and then.
Susan:
The ethics and morality of the situation *were* different then.
How did they change
How did they change? (I don't mean, what was the change?, I mean
What was the process by which they changed?)
Dear Gilberto,
I consider the Will of God to be the basis of all morality. That Will is
expressed through revelation. And it was revealed through Baha'u'llah that
would be no more
On 10/27/05, Susan Maneck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How did they change? (I don't mean, what was the change?, I mean
What was the process by which they changed?)
Dear Gilberto,
I consider the Will of God to be the basis of all morality. That Will is
expressed through revelation
Scott Saylors [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a copy of the music video "Mona Angel of Shiraz" If anyone would like a copy e-mailed to them it is about 8-and-a-half megabytes with a 4 minute and 40 second run time. Very well done.
If anyone would like the video, just drop me a line off list
11 matches
Mail list logo
