They were basically rejected posts intended for soc.religion.bahai
which I felt you were mischaracterizing and then rejecting.
That doesn't give you the right to bring it here.
As I said, you are no longer welcome on this forum.
The information contained in this e-mail and any
: limits of hikmat, righteous warfare, jihad, etc.
I agree One God is the source, He also provides us with progressive
revelation. Freedom needs to be tempered with wisdom. Perhaps you would
like to explain what you mean by censorship appearing in our faith?
- Original Message -
From: Loïc
Anyway, I see some risks of censorship when I read some baha'i
publications
that have been reviewed, corrected, validated, re-reviewed...
Dear Loic,
What 're-reviewed' are you talking about?
warmest, Susan
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto
Dear Loïc,
It doesn't appear to me that your simple example A simple word of the
Faith : the Bayan, which could be easily translated in french by
l'Annonce or l'Explication, but people are so afraid to translate that
they keep the Bayan in their writings. is, at all, an example of baha'i
:08 PM
Subject: Re: limits of hikmat, righteous warfare, jihad, etc.
Dear Loïc,
It doesn't appear to me that your simple example A simple word of the
Faith : the Bayan, which could be easily translated in french by l'Annonce
or l'Explication, but people are so afraid to translate
What I meant is that I sometimes feel worried when I see so many
warnings at the beginning or at the end of some Baha'i writings.
examples given: this text has been translated by the X committee,
reviewed by the Y committee, approved by Z, and might be later
corrected by ZZ...
Dear Loic,
A simple word of the Faith : the Bayan, which
could be
easily translated in french by l'Annonce or l'Explication, but
people
are so afraid to translate that they keep the Bayan in their
writings.
Dear Loic,
When it appears in the Writings we do translate it, normally
as 'utterance'
Loïc ROYER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Ben,
It seems I have made some exagerations by writing re-reviewed by dozens of
people, councils, assemblies...
SORRY for this!
We must take care about freedom of believes, thoughts and speeches, for
everyone!
;-)
Loïc
I
Dear Scott,
It would be a mistake to interpret the House's April 7 letter as an
attack on the notion of academic freedom. What they are criticizing is
the attempt to misuse the term in a Baha'i religious context. Academic
freedom is the freedom of teachers, students, and academic
I agree completely. The reference is to individuals who sought their own
objectives and used the 'mask' of academic freedom to hide their agenda. It is
a specific not a general reference.
Regards,
Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Scott,
It would be a mistake to interpret the
I have heard about these evangelical religions, they look to be
more
efficient than us in terms of number of conversions! ;-)
Dear Loic,
Yes, there seems to be resurgence of conservatism and literalism in
religion all over the world. Our retention, bad as it is, is a bit
better however.
Dear Susan
I've been following this discussion with increasing interest.
You mentioned that:
That is one of the reasons Baha'u'llah often gave people titles equivalent
to the numerical value of their names.
Do you know of any examples, or could cite me a source where I could read
more about
Gilberto Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On 1/6/07, Susan Maneck wrote:
Were not going to cover the same ground again and again. You have been
told this is not the Baha'i teachings and yet you keep insisting we
believe something we don't. I'm rejecting this as inflamatory.
I'm not trying
When were internet writings and websites *subject* to review and when
did it change?
-G
On 1/6/07, Scott Saylors [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gilberto Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/6/07, Susan Maneck wrote:
Were not going to cover the same ground again and again. You have been
What makes the difference of the Baha'i faith is the individual freedom, to
search, discover, discuss, write, think, believe...
Of course this freedom is already given by other religions,
but I understand the baha'is put this freedom over its limits,
by accepting that error can be better than
What really makes the difference is the source.
- Original Message -
From: Loïc ROYER [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Baha'i Studies bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: limits of hikmat, righteous warfare, jihad, etc.
What makes the difference
, righteous warfare, jihad, etc.
What really makes the difference is the source.
- Original Message -
From: Loïc ROYER [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Baha'i Studies bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: limits of hikmat, righteous warfare, jihad, etc.
What
bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: limits of hikmat, righteous warfare, jihad, etc.
I don't see what you mean.
The source of all religions is one and unique God, same for all, isn't it!
- Original Message -
From: Michael Alcorn [EMAIL PROTECTED
Dear friends,
Gilberto has been forwarding private correspondence to this list
without permission. Please do not respond and encourage this kind of
behavior.
Gilberto, you are no longer welcome here.
Susan
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail)
They were basically rejected posts intended for soc.religion.bahai
which I felt you were mischaracterizing and then rejecting.
-G
On 1/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear friends,
Gilberto has been forwarding private correspondence to this list
without permission. Please do
20 matches
Mail list logo
