On Jan 25, 2008 5:18 PM, firestorm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gilberto,
:-)
awesome. we may be headed to some common ground.
I don't see it but I hope you are right.
;Sure, but it is easy to misrepresent another person's views while
attempting to speak on their behalf.
true enough. on
gilberto,
:-)
awesome. we may be headed to some common ground.
;Sure, but it is easy to misrepresent another person's views while
attempting to speak on their behalf.
true enough. on the other hand, i don;t think anyone can, without some bit of
paperwork in hand to be deemed to be speaking
On Jan 19, 2008 3:20 PM, firestorm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G wrote:
:I really think you should let the other participants of the thread
speak for themselves
it wouild be difficult to stop someone from speaking for themselves.
Sure, but it is easy to misrepresent another person's views
well..no.
there is a 1 in 10^6 chance that a female mule may have been passed on
sufficient genetic matieral to be able to reproduce.
http://www.lovelongears.com/faq
beyond that what is a jack, in re equines?
http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=jack
http://muleschool.com/_wsn/page8.html
sir,
my very sincere apoliogies, and a sincere assurance that there is no
patronisation, no deamning, no anything other than respect for ur pov in paying
attentiuon to the fact that ur cv seems to have a math flavour.
:I really think you should let the other participants of the thread
speak
Gilberto wrote:
But then does it make sense to say that they eventually crucified
that divine Spirit, the Word of God? Wouldn't these terms apply to
the spiritual aspect?
I think that here, the Master is referring to Jesus by these terms,
rather than only referring to His spiritual aspect; just
On Jan 18, 2008 4:54 AM, Brent Poirier Attorney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gilberto wrote:
But then does it make sense to say that they eventually crucified
that divine Spirit, the Word of God? Wouldn't these terms apply to
the spiritual aspect?
I think that here, the Master is referring to
On Jan 18, 2008 2:53 PM, firestorm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gilberto,
:-)
after i recalled ur skillset, ur reasoning becomes crystal.
I certainly don't feel understood. I do feel patronized by your
comments about my skillset. I don't think your use of math/techie
analogies is helpful or
gilberto,
:-)
after i recalled ur skillset, ur reasoning becomes crystal.
excuse me if i am replying to the wrong thread, but i would offer u these:
:Just because there are good decent
people who are Christian doesn't prove that the Bible is a perfectly
authentic text.
that is not the
You can breed a male mule. It's called a Jack. It will be sterile however and
incapable of breeding anything.
Regards,
Scott
firestorm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gilberto,
:-)
after i recalled ur skillset, ur reasoning becomes crystal.
excuse me if i am replying to the wrong thread, but i
Some of these answers seem inconsistent and I'm wondering if the issue
can be clarified. My understanding of what you are trying to say is
that the physical aspect of Jesus died on the cross but in some
spiritual sense, he survived. Is that correct?
On Jan 17, 2008 7:46 AM, Brent Poirier Attorney
Dear Friends,
Allah'u'Abha.
1- I am looking for the source of Abdu'l-Baha's
explanation/interpretation on the Quranic verse 4: 157, where He
explains that the meaning of that verse is not that Jesus was not
crucified (as the popular Muslim understanding is), but that the
spiritual infuence and
Mina,
At 02:44 AM 1/18/2005, you wrote:
Has the beloved Guardian ever written on the crucifixion and resurrection of
Christ? If yes, where?
1646. The Crucifixion as Recorded in the New Testament is Correct
...Though we cannot imagine exactly what the Manifestations of the remote
past
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 03:10:45 -0600, Mark A. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...We do not believe that there was a bodily resurrection after the
Crucifixion of Christ, but that there was a time after His Ascension when His
disciples perceived spiritually His true greatness and realized He
One way I would look at it is that the story is vivid in order to prove a point. Above and beyond the spiritual - allegorical point that is made, the story of Jesus's rising from the dead and walking around is fiction.
Gilberto Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 03:10:45 -0600,
In a message dated 1/18/2005 11:26:21 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sure, that's something of how I might make sense of the Biblicalaaccounts myself. But still, I wonder if that was the case, even ifyou are going to say the story is fiction, why would Thomas be writtenthat
16 matches
Mail list logo
