Re: [bareos-users] losing LTO3 tape capacity with bareos. But full tape length can be written with dd or btape speed

2018-11-05 Thread Tim Banchi
will test this as well. On Thursday, August 23, 2018 at 10:42:56 AM UTC+2, Tim Banchi wrote: > Hi Udo, > > it's not only about decreasing write-speed, but also about decreasing > capacity. Also, when a good tape follows a bad tape, write speed is back > again around 40MB

Re: [bareos-users] losing LTO3 tape capacity with bareos. But full tape length can be written with dd or btape speed

2018-08-23 Thread Tim Banchi
disks, what > kind of disks/ssd)? > > I had an high load on the backup-server with an spooldisk (for 3 lto-4 > drives) with raid10 on 6*SAS 15k disks. > With raid0 (the spool disks only) the load was ok. > > Udo > > On 21.08.2018 15:46, Tim Banchi wrote: > >

Re: [bareos-users] losing LTO3 tape capacity with bareos. But full tape length can be written with dd or btape speed

2018-08-22 Thread Tim Banchi
low down backup if the data is encrypted (and compressed). > > > > Stefan > > > > > Am 22.08.2018 um 09:40 schrieb Tim > Banchi: > > > > Hi Stefan, > > yes, I use newly purchased ones when the autoloader/d

Re: [bareos-users] losing LTO3 tape capacity with bareos. But full tape length can be written with dd or btape speed

2018-08-22 Thread Tim Banchi
self test function in the firmware? If so, try it. > If not, maybe there is a test software from the vendor available? > > Best regards, > Kai > > Am 22.08.2018 um 09:40 schrieb Tim Banchi: > > Hi Stefan, > > > > yes, I use newly purchased ones when the autoloader/

Re: [bareos-users] losing LTO3 tape capacity with bareos. But full tape length can be written with dd or btape speed

2018-08-22 Thread Tim Banchi
> > Regards > > > > Stefan > > > > > Am 21.08.2018 um 15:46 schrieb Tim > Banchi: > > > > Hello, > > I'm using Bareos 17.2 with the following pool, and device configuration: >

[bareos-users] losing LTO3 tape capacity with bareos. But full tape length can be written with dd or btape speed

2018-08-21 Thread Tim Banchi
Hello, I'm using Bareos 17.2 with the following pool, and device configuration: Pool { Name = tape_automated Pool Type = Backup Recycle = yes # Bareos can automatically recycle Volumes AutoPrune = yes # Prune expired volumes #Recycle Oldest

[bareos-users] during Virtual full, Always Incremental job is "is waiting on Storage", with max concurrent jobs >=2

2018-03-22 Thread Tim Banchi
Dear bareos community, I cannot find the error in my Always incremental configuration (using bareos 17.2.4). Whenever a VirtualFull (serv1_nc) runs into the AI backup window (e.g. consolidating a full), my Always Incrementals of the same client are waiting until the VirtualFull is finished.

[bareos-users] tape library smartctl errors logged while nothing in HW log files and bareos backups are "OK"

2018-01-15 Thread Tim Banchi
Dear bareos-users, I'm using 16.2.4 and found out that smartctl reports errors when querying my tape library (HP G2 1/8 Storeever with Ultrium 920 LTO-3 SCSI): smartctl -x /dev/sg5 results in: === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === TapeAlert Supported TapeAlert: OK Current Drive

[bareos-users] Re: Virtual Full after Always Incremental and consolidate: wrong read storage

2017-11-15 Thread Tim Banchi
On Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 8:03:17 PM UTC+1, Anthony Melentev wrote: > четверг, 26 октября 2017 г., 21:16:46 UTC+5 пользователь Tim Banchi написал: > > Dear bareos-user, > > > > I'm at loss to create a working VirtualFull job after Always Incremental > &

[bareos-users] Re: automatically run (verify) job after (backup) job

2017-11-13 Thread Tim Banchi
On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 3:35:24 PM UTC+2, Tim Banchi wrote: > Dear community, > > I couldn't find a way how to automatically run a verify job after a backup > job. The run script console command doesn't accept run. To start verify with > a slightly postponed schedule and

Re: Re: [bareos-users] Virtual Full after Always Incremental and consolidate: wrong read storage

2017-11-07 Thread Tim Banchi
On Tuesday, November 7, 2017 at 10:54:25 AM UTC+1, Tim Banchi wrote: > On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 6:12:20 PM UTC+1, Jon SCHEWE wrote: > > On 11/6/17 8:40 AM, Tim Banchi wrote: > > > On Monday, October 30, 2017 at 3:00:29 PM UTC+1, Jon SCHEWE wrote: > > >> You're

Re: Re: [bareos-users] Virtual Full after Always Incremental and consolidate: wrong read storage

2017-11-07 Thread Tim Banchi
On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 6:12:20 PM UTC+1, Jon SCHEWE wrote: > On 11/6/17 8:40 AM, Tim Banchi wrote: > > On Monday, October 30, 2017 at 3:00:29 PM UTC+1, Jon SCHEWE wrote: > >> You're setup looks very close to mine. I am doing the same thing that > >> you want

Re: [bareos-users] Virtual Full after Always Incremental and consolidate: wrong read storage

2017-11-06 Thread Tim Banchi
= "Consolidate" >   Type = "Consolidate" >   Accurate = "yes" >   JobDefs = "DefaultJob" >   FileSet = "LinuxAll" > >   Max Full Consolidations = 1 > } > > Storage { >   Name = File >   Address = gemini  

[bareos-users] Virtual Full after Always Incremental and consolidate: wrong read storage

2017-10-26 Thread Tim Banchi
Dear bareos-user, I'm at loss to create a working VirtualFull job after Always Incremental and consolidate. I read the documentation and many forum posts here, but the virtual-full job always picks the wrong storage. I should get different a read storage and write storage. Always incremental

[bareos-users] Always incremental + consolidate: consolidate runs successful but does nothing

2017-10-26 Thread Tim Banchi
Hello, I'm at loss to create a working consolidate job. I read the documentation and many forum posts here, but somehow it doesn't seem to work. The consolidate job runs successful but does nothing (the consolidate pool on the disk is not touched, although the messages say it's consolidating).

[bareos-users] automatically run (verify) job after (backup) job

2017-10-05 Thread Tim Banchi
Dear community, I couldn't find a way how to automatically run a verify job after a backup job. The run script console command doesn't accept run. To start verify with a slightly postponed schedule and lower priority seems not ideal, because I have to duplicate all schedules. How is this best

[bareos-users] Re: Nothing happens after add compression option...

2017-02-09 Thread Tim Banchi
On Wednesday, February 1, 2017 at 11:55:27 AM UTC+1, Gilberto Ferreira wrote: > Hello friends > > I am running bareos 16.2.4 and after add this configuration: > > Compression = lz4 > > in fileset like this: > > FileSet { > Name = "managerserver-files" > Include { > Options { >

[bareos-users] Re: combining client-side software compression and software encryption

2017-02-06 Thread Tim Banchi
. I'm not sure if the limitation is due to the SCSI-card, the LTO-2 tape or the AMD machine. Still have to do tests with compression and encryption. On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 1:47:13 PM UTC+1, Tim Banchi wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using the latest bareos 16.2 server on an LTO-3

[bareos-users] combining client-side software compression and software encryption

2017-02-06 Thread Tim Banchi
Hello, I'm using the latest bareos 16.2 server on an LTO-3 tape (HW compression, but no HW encryption) Due to network limitations, I would rather prefer software compression at the client and due to LTO-3, I need software encryption. If I enable both (compression in the FileSet and encryption