dyndb ldap being raped by redhat

2024-04-08 Thread Marc
I am quite a bit annoyed with how redhat has completely failed to put proper engineers on this dyndb-ldap. They have currently made it like this that: - if you have an ldap server next to your named, they literally download everything from your ldap server to named. so you have data twice in me

RE: netstat showing multiple lines for each listening socket

2024-07-09 Thread Marc
el9 bind-9.16, maybe netstat/os? tcp0 0 x.x.x.x:530.0.0.0:* LISTEN 46622/named tcp0 0 y.y.y.y:530.0.0.0:* LISTEN 46622/named tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:53 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 46622/named >

RE: 9.18 horrendous

2024-08-23 Thread Marc
) So doing something for free is not an excuse to be allowed to fuck up or irresponsible. > > My kid would know better than to take free candy. And if he did he would > know there is a risk involved for which only he would be responsible. > > On Fri, Aug 23,

RE: 9.18 horrendous

2024-08-23 Thread Marc
> > That being said. It's preposterous to complain about free software. > > So if some store owner gives your kid candy that previously fell on the floor, you are not complaining because it was for free ? -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from

RE: 9.18 horrendous

2024-08-23 Thread Marc
anges a few years up front. (To prevent eg that once a market share is acquired, the project is continued as not open source (think of elastic search)) > On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 3:51 PM Marc <mailto:m...@f1-outsourcing.eu> > wrote: > > > > I don't think you

RE: Updated Docker images (9.18, 9.20, 9.21) - now based on Alpine Linux

2024-08-27 Thread Marc
> > Sure, it’s not secret: > > https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9-docker > > Branches with history… > Afaik apk del \ does not free up space still. If you work with builder phase, you can probably shave of some MB's 1 # Version: 0.0.1 - 3proxy 2 3 # 4 # Stag

RE: Updated Docker images (9.18, 9.20, 9.21) - now based on Alpine Linux

2024-08-27 Thread Marc
> > > On 27. 8. 2024, at 18:57, Marc wrote: > > > > Afaik apk del \ does not free up space still. > > Right. That was not really my intention though. I wanted to reduce > the amount of cruft installed in the image. The less binary stuff > around, the less poss

RE: Updated Docker images (9.18, 9.20, 9.21) - now based on Alpine Linux

2024-08-27 Thread Marc
> > What’s the size difference for you? > > I mean if someone wants to play with our Dockerfile and there’s a > significant reduction is size, I would be convinced. But in a world, > where a mobile application that does absolutely nothing has 4 GB, I feel > like 130 MB is on the low side of the s

RE: Updated Docker images (9.18, 9.20, 9.21) - now based on Alpine Linux

2024-09-02 Thread Marc
gt; wrote: > >>> > >>> For what it's worth this is how we build our dockers, with a builder > >>> and then the runner. IMO it's cleaner that way and not much more > >>> complicated. We'll continue to roll our own though so no real do

RE: Updated Docker images (9.18, 9.20, 9.21) - now based on Alpine Linux

2024-09-02 Thread Marc
> > I think this will copy duplicates, duplicates increase still layer > size so you have 2x size of a default /usr > > so you can only copy individual files > > You are right, extra files appear in the diff! I was thinking that the > files already present would be discarded. Copying

RE: Updated Docker images (9.18, 9.20, 9.21) - now based on Alpine Linux

2024-09-02 Thread Marc
I can definitely remember having a performance difference between my container and a vm. I never bothered to research it any further and thought maybe it was related to older cgroups implementation, oc, or older distro. > > By any chance have you measured the performance difference between GNU

RE: How to validate DNSSEC signed record with dig?

2012-02-06 Thread Marc Lampo
Hello, To be precise : bind.odvr.dns-oarc.net. validates but seems to ignore expired (but otherwise valid) signatures. unbound.odvr.dns-oarc.net. validates without ignoring expired signatures. Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer EURid vzw/asbl -Original Message- From: Spain

RE: Efficacy of using short timeout values for an A record

2012-02-15 Thread Marc Lampo
o 3 hours - with built-in, not changeable, max of 7 days) and max-cache-ttl : max positive cache time (defaults to 7 days) (other values that can be "corrected" are max and min refresh and retry times, thus protecting a slave server from "unreasonable" values sent by the m

RE: bind public/private domain question

2012-02-21 Thread Marc Lampo
ather than "fractions of seconds") I strongly advice not to forward to external, caching name servers. Or, if you do, also enable DNSSEC validation (and forward to an external name server that is at least "DNSSEC aware" - 8.8.8.8 is not, searches for DS records in the wrong pla

RE: lists.isc.org rDNS failed, DNSSEC?

2012-02-28 Thread Marc Lampo
s, if the signatures are simply ignored. Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer EURid (for .eu) -Original Message- From: michoski [mailto:micho...@cisco.com] Sent: 24 February 2012 06:01 AM To: vinny_abe...@dell.com; kob6...@gmail.com; ma...@isc.org Cc: bind-us...@isc.org Subject:

RE: NSEC3PARAM not honored in inline-signer mode (was Re: BIND 9.9.0 is now available)

2012-03-07 Thread Marc Lampo
s not easy ...) Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer EURid (for .eu) -Original Message- ... (Also, if you want to switch to NSEC instead of NSEC3, you can use 'rndc signing -nsec3param none'.) -- Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org Internet Sys

RE: Truncated DNS message over UDP

2012-06-27 Thread Marc Lampo
NSSEC related RFC's explicitly state to leave authority/additional section empty if filling them would lead to the answer becoming too big and requiring the TC bit to be set. --> it is not a configuration setting, it's RFC defined. Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer EURid (for .e

RE: BIND, DNSSEC & AD

2012-06-29 Thread Marc Lampo
lausible attack vector for hackers ? Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer EURid (for .eu) From: John Williams [mailto:john.1...@yahoo.com] Sent: 28 June 2012 10:35 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: BIND, DNSSEC & AD I have an environment that hosts a BIND based int

RE: BIND, DNSSEC & AD

2012-07-01 Thread Marc Lampo
? à since the root zone is already algo 8 (RSA/SHA-256) à since most tld’s are 7 or 8 and most with NSEC3 the Windows DNS service is going to treat most of DNSSEC’d name space as “unsigned” anyway … (another argument to switch to Bind, internally ?) Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security

RE: DNSSEC for NS delegation record

2012-07-17 Thread Marc Lampo
. You need to complete the chain of trust by also signing the parent – “testing.net.” - and having its DS information published in its parent – “net.” ! Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer EURid From: Khuu, Linh Contractor [mailto:linh.k...@ssa.gov] Sent: dinsdag 17 juli

Re: adding DS record via nsupdate

2013-02-06 Thread Marc Lampo
Precisely ! That is why one of the sanity checks is if NS records exist at all. If not, no DS records will be added. And reversely : if all NS records are removed, any DS record will be removed as well. Just as Mark Andrews indicated. Kind regards, Marc Lampo On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:59 AM

Re: Forwarding requests when DNS name doesn't exist?

2013-10-10 Thread Marc Lampo
server has knowledge, because it is authoritative, it will use that knowledge and will not try to query name servers on the Internet. It becomes "bogus" for that zone : no delegation, but having knowledge. Kind regards, Marc On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Peter Olsson wrote:

Re: Does anyone have DNSSEC problem with uscg.mil

2013-11-14 Thread Marc Lampo
Not at this moment : $ dig @8.8.8.8 mx uscg.mil. +dnssec ; <<>> DiG 9.8.4-rpz2+rl005.12-P1 <<>> @8.8.8.8 mx uscg.mil. +dnssec ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 42506 ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 9, AUTHORITY: 0

Re: Does anyone have DNSSEC problem with uscg.mil

2013-11-14 Thread Marc Lampo
And the name server 199.211.218.6 does not seem lame either : $ dig @199.211.218.6 mx uscg.mil. +dnssec ; <<>> DiG 9.8.4-rpz2+rl005.12-P1 <<>> @199.211.218.6 mx uscg.mil. +dnssec ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 61958 ;;

Re: Does anyone have DNSSEC problem with uscg.mil

2013-11-14 Thread Marc Lampo
re replying from cache these abnormalities should not be fatal, in my opinion. I wonder what kind of name servers uscg.mil uses ? Kind regards, On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Khuu, Linh Contractor wrote: > *Hi Marc,* > > > > *Yes, on my DNS server, if I do a dig @8.8.8.8 <http:/

Re: Does anyone have DNSSEC problem with uscg.mil

2013-11-14 Thread Marc Lampo
14, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Marc Lampo wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> dnsstuff.com gives me all green for DNSSEC of uscg.mil. >> dnsviz.net gives warnings (not : errors) on all RRSIG's - something with >&g

Re: How to Fix Reverse DNS?

2015-09-22 Thread Marc Haber
archaxis.net. 80/29.233.202.162.in-addr.arpa. 7200 IN NS ns1.archaxis.net. so you need zone "80/29.233.202.162.in-addr.arpa." { ... } Btw, this diagnosis would not have been possible if you had obfuscated the IP address. Thanks for being open, showing your real data, allowing s

Shared libraries loaded after chroot

2016-05-16 Thread Marc Haber
ibly security relevant libraries from the automated update mechanisms of the distributions, and would therefore greatly reduce ease of upgrades. It is also not mentioned in Chapter 6 of the ARM. What is the official upstream remedy to this situation? Frankly, I think this

Re: Shared libraries loaded after chroot

2016-05-16 Thread Marc Haber
es since it allows the chrooted root account to _directly_ _change_ the files of the parent system. You can run unchrooted without much more danger. Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber | "I don't trust Compu

Re: Shared libraries loaded after chroot

2016-05-16 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 08:09:05AM -0400, Matthew Pounsett wrote: > On 16 May 2016 at 04:38, Marc Haber wrote: > > I have filed Debian Bug #820974 (http://bugs.debian.org/820974) > > accordingly. The Debian bind people suggest that I copy the respective > > libraries to th

Re: Shared libraries loaded after chroot

2016-05-16 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:23:30PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote: > Marc Haber wrote: > > in Debian, the bind9 packages have recently started to trouble me in > > chrooted environments since some cryptographic libraries are loaded > > after bind has chrooted itself, which resul

srv lookup in record

2020-08-21 Thread Marc Roos
168.124.51 192.168.123.100 192.168.123.102 [@temp3]$ dig +short srv _http-apps._server.test._tcp.marathon.mesos 0 1 31024 server.test-usbzr-s3.marathon.mesos. 0 1 31852 server.test-z9x84-s3.marathon.mesos. 0 1 31790 server.test-k7g8r-s4.marathon.mesos. [marc@os0 temp3]$ dig +short srv _http-demo._s

RE: srv lookup in record

2020-08-22 Thread Marc Roos
> I don't think so, nor does it seem to make sense to me that you would > want such a thing (in the general case, you may have a use-case). What would be better way to solve this then? To filter out only the ip addresses that are in the same netmask? _

RE: Bind stats - denied queries?

2020-11-30 Thread Marc Roos
Are newer version of bind still logging like this Nov 30 10:10:02 ns0 named[1303]: rate-limit: info: limit responses to 3.9.41.0/24 Nov 30 10:10:02 ns0 named[1303]: rate-limit: info: limit responses to 35.177.154.0/24 Nov 30 10:10:02 ns2 named[1241]: rate-limit: info: limit responses to

RE: Bind stats - denied queries?

2020-11-30 Thread Marc Roos
. Am 30.11.20 um 11:12 schrieb Marc Roos: > Are newer version of bind still logging like this > > Nov 30 10:10:02 ns0 named[1303]: rate-limit: info: limit responses to > 3.9.41.0/24 > Nov 30 10:10:02 ns0 named[1303]: rate-limit: info: limit responses to > 35.177.154.0/24 >

RE: Bind stats - denied queries?

2020-11-30 Thread Marc Roos
tim please try to understand https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/dns-amplification-ddos-attack/ and RRL is only useful for that type of attack, everything else don't matter for a DNS server and more important you can't distinct it anyways Am 30.11.20 um 18:23 schrieb Marc Roos: > Regardless if

RE: Bind stats - denied queries?

2020-12-01 Thread Marc Roos
r 30, 2020 10:45 PM To: Marc Roos; bind-users; kpielorz.lst Subject: Re: Bind stats - denied queries? Am 30.11.20 um 20:01 schrieb Marc Roos > You assume incorrectly that every such log entry is from spoofed > traffic. every relevant one, yes > This is about correct logging. Even if

KSK rollover, set revoke bit unconditionally ? (cfr RFC5011)

2010-11-05 Thread Marc Lampo
ional setting of the revocation bit is generally considered as best practice ? This, in my opinion, adds more complexity for the administrator of DNSSEC zones. Isn't it enough to use the revoke bit only in case of an actual/suspected compromise ? Your comments are welcome ! Kind regards,

forwarding + validating name server : protocol error or simply "unexplored fields" ?

2010-11-09 Thread Marc Lampo
e : "unexplored fields" ? While this gets sorted out, be careful when adding DNSSEC validation to forwarding name servers : only if the caching name server(s), to which queries are forwarded, are DNSSEC aware themselves will the combination "forwarding" + "validating

Re: "forward after" option

2010-11-12 Thread Marc Lampo
DN to your internal server. The fact that, on the internal server, that FQDN might itself not be a delegated name (no NS records) is of no relevance to the partner name server. Hope this helps. Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer       EURid     Woluwelaan 150     1831 Diegem -

DNSSEC - 1 RRSIG - expires while in cache

2010-11-27 Thread Marc Lampo
the TTL into account ? (so that it does not resign later then "present expiration" - "TTL") Or is this irrelevant because the answer to earlier question is that an expired RRSIG in the cache must be refreshed. Thanks and kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Off

DNSSEC - mismatch between algorithm and type of NSEC

2010-12-29 Thread Marc Lampo
(I didn't find any - RFC5155 states the new algorithms - 6 and 7 - *must* be used when NSEC3 is used, But not a word - unless I overlooked it - about using algorithm 7 and yet, NSEC ...) Looking forward to your comments. Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer       EURid     Wo

caching of expired RRSIG's ?

2011-01-03 Thread Marc Lampo
f the entire answer. Thanks and kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer       EURid     Woluwelaan 150     1831 Diegem - Belgium     TEL.: +32 (0) 2 401 3030     MOB.:+32 (0)476 984 391     marc.la...@eurid.eu     http://www.eurid.eu     Want a .eu web address in your own langua

RE: caching of expired RRSIG's ?

2011-01-03 Thread Marc Lampo
in the RFC do apply to expired RRSIG's in the cache. Thanks and kind regards, Marc Lampo EURid -Original Message- From: Florian Weimer [mailto:fwei...@bfk.de] Sent: 03 January 2011 10:22 AM To: Marc Lampo Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: caching of expired RRSIG's ? *

Re: DNSSEC validation on combined auth+recursive server

2011-01-06 Thread Marc Lampo
me server, even regardless if the bogus name server is DNSSEC aware or not. Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer       EURid     Woluwelaan 150     1831 Diegem - Belgium     marc.la...@eurid.eu     http://www.eurid.eu ___ bind-user

Re: how to proper include DS record on key dnssec

2011-01-14 Thread Marc Lampo
re working with the registrar, You can also consult help pages on EURid.eu website, accessible to registrars only) Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer       EURid     Woluwelaan 150     1831 Diegem - Belgium     TEL.: +32 (0) 2 401 3030     MOB.:+32 (0)476 984 391     marc.la.

RE: bind and IPV6

2011-02-22 Thread Marc Lampo
) Kind regards, Marc Lampo From: hugo hugoo [mailto:hugo...@hotmail.com] Sent: 22 February 2011 12:00 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: bind and IPV6 Dear all, In the scope of the IPV6 deployment, I have been asked if oiyr DNS servers are IPV6 compliant. We are now upgradi

RE: Slaves and views

2011-03-06 Thread Marc Lampo
he zone) at that server, thus bypassing the bad NS rrset. Then, what is the different between "static-stub" and "a forwarding zone" ? Kind regards, Marc ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Stub zone vs forward zone

2011-03-14 Thread Marc Haber
OMAIN without bind even trying to talk to the actual name server. I can ping 10.1.101.6 just fine. I must admit that I haven't yet full understood the difference between a stub zone and a forward zone, any why i need the forwarders { } on the stub zon

Re: Stub zone vs forward zone

2011-03-18 Thread Marc Haber
n-addr.arpa level, or somewhere above that, explicitly, or > so-called "global forwarding" defined in the "options" clause. Global forwarders. So they would take precedence over the locally available delegations for the stub zone? Greetings Marc -- -

Re: Stub zone vs forward zone

2011-03-18 Thread Marc Haber
he servers mentioned in the configuration I posted are both authoritative for the zones that they're query for _and_ willing to recurse for my bind if it asked them a recursive query. Which it doesn't in the "forward" setup, it jus

RE: DNSSEC, whitehouse, isc, and troubleshooting...

2011-04-19 Thread Marc Lampo
style - attacks glue (A) records anyway (not CNAME's). Recommendation : If you need to refer to other zones (webhosting, "email-in-the-cloud"), *insist* that they as well implement DNSSEC for their zones ! Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer for EURid vzw/asbl -Original Me

RE: how to check if a slave zone is expired

2011-05-04 Thread Marc Lampo
helpdesk to get this corrected. Kind regards, Marc Lampo EURid vzw/asbl Security Officer From: hugo hugoo [mailto:hugo...@hotmail.com] Sent: 04 May 2011 08:53 AM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: how to check if a slave zone is expired Dear all, Is there a way to check that

RE: how to check if a slave zone is expired

2011-05-04 Thread Marc Lampo
) signal this (Bind does). Hope this helps. Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer EURid vzw/asbl From: hugo hugoo [mailto:hugo...@hotmail.com] Sent: 04 May 2011 09:56 AM To: marc.la...@eurid.eu; bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: RE: how to check if a slave zone is expired Marc

RE: [DNSSEC] Resolver behavior with broken DS records

2011-05-09 Thread Marc Lampo
et. All name servers in this environment are 9.7.2-P3, by the way. The correct DS was referring to algorithm 5, the wrong DS to algorithm 8 (the corresponding algorithm in the DNSKEY record was 5) Kind regards, Marc -Original Message- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:bortzme...@nic.fr]

RE: [DNSSEC] Resolver behavior with broken DS records

2011-05-09 Thread Marc Lampo
So far - no SHA-2 records. Only DS records with SHA-1. I'll add DS records with SHA-2 and try again ... So the "error" of the mismatched must be in the SHA-2 DS records ? And *not* in the SHA-1's ? Or in both ? Kind regards, Marc -Original Message- From:

RE: [DNSSEC] Resolver behavior with broken DS records

2011-05-09 Thread Marc Lampo
lates the keyid and ended up with a value 3 higher then the one of the key in the child. But now, the same keyid is in the child zone and in the DS-record at the parent. And I still have authenticated (AD-bit) answers) Kind regards, Marc -Original Message- From: 'Stephane Bortzme

RE: [dns-operations] Bind 9.8.0 intermittent problem with non-recursive responses

2011-05-20 Thread Marc Lampo
SEC2.pdf, combine info on pages 15+16 (bogus NS) and 17+18 (forwarding NS) ) Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer EURid -Original Message- From: Matthew Pounsett [mailto:m...@conundrum.com] Sent: 20 May 2011 06:49 AM To: Carlos Vicente Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re:

RE: [dns-operations] Bind 9.8.0 intermittent problem with non-recursive responses

2011-05-22 Thread Marc Lampo
Yes, this is a setup I tested (with Bind as name server). You would be getting answers, not with the AD bit set. Kind regards, Marc Lampo -Original Message- From: Carlos Vicente [mailto:cvicente.li...@gmail.com] Sent: 20 May 2011 07:53 PM To: Marc Lampo Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org

RE: Single nameserver doesn't show signed SOA-RRs

2011-06-29 Thread Marc Lampo
also using this ? Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer EURid -Original Message- From: Stefan Foerster [mailto:c...@incertum.net] Sent: 29 June 2011 10:57 PM To: bind-us...@isc.org Subject: Single nameserver doesn't show signed SOA-RRs Hello world, I'm having a proble

RE: about the dig

2011-07-18 Thread Marc Lampo
I guess not, since "it" does not work ;-) After deleting all entries, did you : 1) dig @dns.name. ... or 2) dig @IP.address or 3) No "@..." argument used at all ? In cases 1 & 3, dig will need data from /etc/resolv.conf. Only in case 2 dig can do without. K

RE: about the dig

2011-07-19 Thread Marc Lampo
root. The local caching name server is the only one to know those "new" root's.) Kind regards, Marc Lampo -Original Message- From: Feng He [mailto:short...@gmail.com] Sent: 19 July 2011 07:54 AM To: Marc Lampo Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: about the dig at

RE: Is there a way to disable dnssec validation for a single zone?

2011-08-04 Thread Marc Lampo
*temporary* solution, until the remote side DNS administrators get their thing fixed !!! Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer EURid vzw/asbl -Original Message- From: Dodson, Ron [mailto:ron.dod...@lmco.com] Sent: 04 August 2011 05:47 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Is th

RE: DNSSEC and MS AD

2011-08-09 Thread Marc Lampo
that using MS DNS as validating caching name server is pointless, as the root uses algorithm 8 and domains with unknown algorithms are treated as "unsigned". --> for MS DNS, the chain-of-trust breaks right at the top level, not ? Kind regards, Marc Lampo EURid Security Officer -Ori

DNSSEC : once correct, always correct ?

2011-08-17 Thread Marc Lampo
g the first one, yields SERVFAIL ... If I overlooked something obvious, sorry for the interrupt (but thanks for sending clarifying references). Thanks and kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer       EURid     Woluwelaan 150     1831 Diegem - Belgium     marc.la...@eurid.eu     http

RE: DNSSEC : once correct, always correct ?

2011-08-17 Thread Marc Lampo
n the cache. With that behaviour, it are the (validating) user of that caching name server that will encounter problems. I'm unsure this is desirable behaviour, which I wanted to bring to attention. Kind regards, Marc Lampo -Original Message- From: Paul Wouters [mailto:p...@xel

RE: what does dig +trace do?

2011-08-30 Thread Marc Lampo
your root zone ? Kind regards, Marc Lampo -Original Message- From: Tom Schmitt [mailto:tomschm...@gmx.de] Sent: 30 August 2011 01:57 PM To: bind-users Subject: what does dig +trace do? Hi, I have a question: What does dig +trace exactly do? The reason for my question is: I have a interna

RE: forward question

2011-08-31 Thread Marc Lampo
Hello, Do add "forward only;" to this zone statement. Is this name server available/visible to the Internet ? --> add "allow-query" statement to limit who can query for your internal zone. Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer EURid -Original Message---

RE: dnssec question. confused.

2011-09-27 Thread Marc Lampo
forget to have your caching NS validate DNSSEC answers, because providing signatures that are ignored by clients makes the Internet *less* safe) Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer EURid -Original Message- From: Brad Bendily [mailto:brad.bend...@la.gov] Sent: 27 September 20

RE: DNSSEC Signing & Key Questions

2011-10-04 Thread Marc Lampo
. Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer EURid From: McConville, Kevin [mailto:kmcconvi...@albany.edu] Sent: 04 October 2011 09:10 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: DNSSEC Signing & Key Questions I’m new to this list, so please bear with me if these are/seem like “newbie” quest

RE: DNSSEC SERVFAIL when parent zone has no DS record

2011-10-05 Thread Marc Lampo
y, but I'd check if domain.com. itself is properly signed. Kind regards, Marc Lampo -Original Message- From: Sergio Charpinel Jr. [mailto:sergiocharpi...@gmail.com] Sent: 05 October 2011 01:57 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: DNSSEC SERVFAIL when parent zone has no DS record Hi

RE: DNSSEC SERVFAIL when parent zone has no DS record

2011-10-05 Thread Marc Lampo
for the DS of subdomain.domain.com. do you get a proper reply with AD bit set ? (no idea yet about the www.subdomain.domain.com observations) Kind regards, Marc -Original Message- From: Sergio Charpinel Jr. [mailto:sergiocharpi...@gmail.com] Sent: 05 October 2011 02:22 PM To: Marc Lamp

RE: Query regarding dig output

2011-11-15 Thread Marc Lampo
4096 : so the server returns most of EDNS0 info in the query, but replaces the UDP payload size by what it accepts itself. (cfr recent posting of Mark Andrews in IETF dnsext mailing list about finding this out) Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer EURid From: Gaurav Kansal

RE: DNSSEC key renew time policy

2011-12-28 Thread Marc Lampo
r "thaw" and "unthaw" zone files - it has been experienced this triggers "smart signing" into recalculating (but double check !) 4) Although DNSSEC key's do not expire, do change them regularly : 2-3 months for ZSK's, 1-2 years for KSK's. Kind

RE: DNSSEC authentication and ad parameter

2012-01-10 Thread Marc Lampo
ready for DNSSEC, there will be less and less demand for DLV (didn’t I see a message stating end-of-life ?). Hope this is somehow helpful – if only to state that you should not expect AD-bit set from name servers in the authoritative role. Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer EURid

RE: which NS record will be cached?

2012-01-12 Thread Marc Lampo
ll, have not found yet were Bind 9 shows this ?) Morale : referral in parent should be identical to (or be a subset) of NS records at domain level. Kind regards, Marc Lampo Security Officer EURid (for .eu) -Original Message- From: MontyRee [mailto:chulm...@hotmail.com] Sent: 12 January 2012

Re: getaddrinfo Reading IP Address value from res->ai_addr

2012-01-13 Thread Marc Majka
struct sockaddr_in6" (see ) where the sockaddr address is broken down into a port number, IPv6 flow information, an IPv6 address, and a scope ID. -- Marc Majka On 13 Jan, 2012, at 08:59, Martin McCormick wrote: > I am experimenting with getaddrinfo and getnameinfo and have > gotten

** server can't find barcelonamedia.org.barcelonamedia.org: SERVFAIL

2009-11-04 Thread Marc Riera
ia.org. mailman IN MX 10 mailman.barcelonamedia.org. ;### IPs Externas a Zona FBM ### 2020IN A 217.116.20.166 awebmailIN A 217.14.38.81 graficosIN A 193.145.44.102 Thanks for reading. [cid:image001.gif@01CA5D35.9D6CBF00] Joan Marc Rier

RE: ** server can't find barcelonamedia.org.barcelonamedia.org: SERVFAIL

2009-11-06 Thread Marc Riera
update {update_log; }; category update-security {update_log; }; category notify {notify_log; }; category queries {query_log; }; category lame-servers { null; }; }; Thanks to all of you. Joan Marc Riera Duocastella Barcelona Media - Centre d'Innovació Av. Diagonal,

RE: How to find out DNS Server version ?

2009-11-13 Thread Marc Riera
Hello, You can ask them to run this: dig -t txt -c chaos VERSION.BIND @ or my be you are lucky and this web is usefull for you: http://www.howismydns.com/tools.php good luck. Joan Marc Riera Duocastella Barcelona Media - Centre d'Innovació Av. Diagonal, 177, planta 9 08018 - BARC

strange problem with query being dropped/ignored by the BIND process

2017-06-28 Thread Marc Richter
sun4v 5.11 11.3 Thanks ! Marc ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: [E] Re: strange problem with query being dropped/ignored by the BIND process

2017-06-28 Thread Marc Richter
; On Jun 28, 2017 10:26 AM, "Marc Richter" <mailto:marc.rich...@de.verizon.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > we have a setup here consisting of a recursive DNS server and two > monitoring servers. The monitoring servers sent a test query to the DNS >

Re: strange problem with query being dropped/ignored by the BIND process

2017-06-29 Thread Marc Richter
hink that is a reasonable statement in this environment ? What would be the best way to "speed up the application" ? Just increase the worker threads ? Regards Marc On 06/28/17 15:31, Marc Richter wrote: > Hi Ben, > > thanks for the answer. > > Yeah, I think you are righ

Re: strange problem with query being dropped/ignored by the BIND process

2017-06-29 Thread Marc Richter
you have reasonable kernel updates and tcp patches in > this Solaris server ? Yes, of course. Regards Marc ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: [E] Re: strange problem with query being dropped/ignored by the BIND process

2017-06-29 Thread Marc Richer
e the one cpu at 100% is your bottleneck. I checked that with mpstat earlier already and the load is evenly distributed amongst all CPUs. None of the CPUs is overloaded. Regards Marc ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to

BIND 9.11.4 crashing with SIGBUS error shortly after starting

2018-08-29 Thread Marc Richter
same built environment and same build flags to build 9.11.4 I started getting these issues. Could someone give a clue whether that's more likely to be an issue with my environment, or in the code ? Regards Marc signature.asc Description: OpenPGP d

Cached negative responses

2018-12-20 Thread Marc Richter
d-error on some settings to see if that helps ? Regards Marc signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@list

problem with bind stop

2009-07-01 Thread Joan Marc Riera
Hello, we have some troubles with restart and stop. bind does not stop and I think it's because of a wrong kill argument on the stop) case. I think that the kill -0 $PID should be something else, is it possible? Many thanks Marc From /etc/init.d/bind9: stop) #here i erase

named is creating excessive number of tmp-xxxxx files.

2023-12-28 Thread Marc Chamberlin via bind-users
be an unsafe practice? I don't know if these files are being used to persist information across restarts of the named service or not... These tmp files contain binary information and as such are unreadable. Much appreciate, and thanks in advance for some advice...    Marc C -- *"The Tru

Localhost view is not working for me

2020-03-30 Thread Marc Chamberlin via bind-users
og files also, after setting the debug level to 10, and the Bind server reports no errors or warnings when it is started up. Thanks for any help offered, and below is what I think is the relevant part of my named.conf file. Marc > view "localhost_resolver" > { > //  

Re: Localhost view is not working for me SOLVED!

2020-04-01 Thread Marc Chamberlin via bind-users
happy camper. Marc.. On 3/30/20 11:42 AM, Bob Harold wrote: > Try without the "match-destinations".  Only use match-clients to > determine the view.  (Or try only match-destinations as a separate test.) > (I have never used match-destinations.) > Turn on query logg

rndc and nsupdate failing to work for me

2019-03-13 Thread Marc Chamberlin via bind-users
TXT "bar" show send and if I use it as follows this is what I see - > # nsupdate -k /etc/letsencrypt/james/Kletsencrypt.+165+56715.key -v > ./test.txt I get lots of output and no indication of any problems. Using dig to see if the update indeed works - >  # dig +short -t txt test.mydomai

Re: rndc and nsupdate failing to work for me

2019-03-13 Thread Marc Chamberlin via bind-users
Hi John,  thanks for replying and your thoughts! I will intersperse my feedback within your comments - On 03/13/2019 08:33 PM, John W. Blue wrote: > > Marc, > >   > > Regarding your rndc problem, I think you might be confusing rndc. > >   > > If rndc is invoked wi

Re: rndc and nsupdate failing to work for me

2019-03-14 Thread Marc Chamberlin via bind-users
ing contest! ;-) I will go poke around and take a look at the startup scripts > > Mark > >> On 14 Mar 2019, at 10:01 am, Marc Chamberlin via bind-users >> wrote: >> >> Hello Bind Users, >> >> I have been working on upgrading my Bind 9.11.2 serve

Re: rndc and nsupdate failing to work for me

2019-03-14 Thread Marc Chamberlin via bind-users
On 03/14/2019 04:40 AM, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > On 14 Mar 2019, at 5:17, Marc Chamberlin via bind-users wrote: > >> On 03/13/2019 08:33 PM, John W. Blue wrote: >>> As an option, instead of including /etc/rndc.key nothing prevents you >>> from including rndc.conf