> > What’s the size difference for you? > > I mean if someone wants to play with our Dockerfile and there’s a > significant reduction is size, I would be convinced. But in a world, > where a mobile application that does absolutely nothing has 4 GB, I feel > like 130 MB is on the low side of the scale. >
I don't look at it like that. I see half back up space required, half of the wear level on ssds, half of the power consumption, twice as fast to deploy. And if you have a lot of downloads this starts counting. I have been telling Microsoft and Bill Gates to reduce updates and footprints, but I don't think they care to much about the environment ;) -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
