We normally like to do a full round of a package in a deprecation state before
removal completely (so deprecated in Bioc 3.19 and removed in Bioc 3.20) but
since there are no reverse dependencies, I don't think this should be an issue
to directly remove from 3.19 without deprecation.
Please
Hello maintainers,
A little over a year ago, Bioconductor moved forward with a default branch
renaming from 'master' to 'devel' on git.bioconductor.org. For an easier
transition we have thus far left the deprecated 'master' branch and if you were
pushing received a Warning message that this
Hi Lori,
Thank you very much for your help.
As long as it won't be a problem that I don't think my COH e-mail address will
not be able to receive messages after 4/30, then I agree to direct removal. I
believe this is what has been discussed with Yate-Ching and Xiwei, in terms of
the general
