[blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment 2: Dark mode support for web apps

2022-11-01 Thread 'Louise Brett' via blink-dev
Contact emailsloubr...@google.com, glen...@chromium.org, mgi...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/manifest-incubations/blob/gh-pages/user-preferences-explainer.md Specification Summary Add a field to the web app manifest which allows apps to specify a different theme color and

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Same-site cross-origin prerendering triggered by the speculation rules API

2022-11-01 Thread Domenic Denicola
Hey folks, I've been prodding the partners in question to respond here when best they can. Hopefully we'll hear from them soon! This feature is not enabled under experimental-web-platform-features. It's not really possible to write a test which fails in a non-timeout manner, because the failure

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Symbols as WeakMap keys

2022-11-01 Thread 'Shu-yu Guo' via blink-dev
Contact emails...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/tc39/proposal-symbols-as-weakmap-keys Specificationhttps://tc39.es/proposal-symbols-as-weakmap-keys Summary This proposal allows Symbols to be used as keys in WeakMaps, WeakSet, as the referent in a WeakRef, and as the target in a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Reduce Accept-Language Origin Trial

2022-11-01 Thread Victor Tan
Hi Jeffrey, Thanks for your information. I updated the Chrome Status entry to correctly represent current status. I will work on spec and migrate the explainer to CG if needed. Bests, Victor On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 2:26 PM Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > I see that your Chrome Status entry >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Same-site cross-origin prerendering triggered by the speculation rules API

2022-11-01 Thread Rick Byers
+1 to elaborate on "We've heard from a few partners that they want to prerender among other same-site origins they own" to the extent possible. But given the relatively small addition to an already shipped feature, I'm personally OK with a pretty low bar here. It looks like one of the new tests

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Reduce Accept-Language Origin Trial

2022-11-01 Thread Jeffrey Yasskin
I see that your Chrome Status entry says "Specification being incubated in a Community Group", but your explainer is not hosted by a CG, and the specification you cite is 1) in a WG and 2) not the specification you'll need to write for

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Reduce Accept-Language Origin Trial

2022-11-01 Thread Will Dillard
You should keep all the languages in the Navigator even though it takes up more file space it helps people understand where they might want to navigate to and shows origin of speech which is not readily available it adds a nice touch and you should also include the narrator from Microsoft Edge or

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Anonymous iframes

2022-11-01 Thread Rick Byers
[Removing internal-only chrome-security-owp-team list] Sorry, one more question: the tests seem to be mostly failing on wpt.fyi even with --enable-experimental-web-platform-features. Do you

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Reduce Accept-Language Origin Trial

2022-11-01 Thread Victor Tan
Hi Will, Please feel free to add your feedback and cases to https://github.com/Tanych/accept-language once the origin trial is available. Thanks. Bests, Victor On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 10:00 PM Will Dillard wrote: > You should keep all the languages in the Navigator even though it takes up >

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Reduce Accept-Language Origin Trial

2022-11-01 Thread Victor Tan
Hi Brian, Currently, we don't have such a mechanism, but we can see how the origin trial goes regarding the JS interface. Free feel to add your feedback to https://github.com/Tanych/accept-language once the origin trial is available. On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 8:32 PM Brian Birtles wrote: > Hi, >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Anonymous iframes

2022-11-01 Thread Rick Byers
Reading through the discussion on the Mozilla standards position thread I share the concern about the continued increase in complexity we're adding to the web platform with all these different security / isolation knobs. I will be the

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Remove: HTTP/2 and gQUIC server push

2022-11-01 Thread Mitar
Hi! After playing more with link preload header, I have found another issue where it fails flat as a replacement for server push: where response type depends on Accept header (e.g., APIs which can return XML or JSON depending on Accept header, i.e., content negotiation). You cannot really specify

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Reduce Accept-Language Origin Trial

2022-11-01 Thread Mike Taylor
Hi Brian, Feedback as issues opened against https://github.com/Tanych/accept-language would be most welcome. later, Mike On 10/31/22 8:32 PM, Brian Birtles wrote: Hi, Where should developers give feedback about this proposal? The changes to the Accept-Language header are ameliorated by