[PATCH] frcode: avoid link failure due to multiple program_name definitions

Hello, I tried to build from git and got this: frcode.c: In function 'main': frcode.c:226: warning: implicit declaration of function 'set_program_name' mv -f .deps/frcode.Tpo .deps/frcode.Po gcc -std=gnu99 -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wall -Wall -Wshadow -Wformat-security -Winit-self

Re: [PATCH] frcode: avoid link failure due to multiple program_name definitions

Applied and pushed. Thanks! James.

assertion failures of findutils 4.5.7

Hello, Sami Farin (CC'd) discovered some flaws in recent findutils and reported them at Red Hat bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579476#c0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579476#c2 Here are proposed patches: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=404487

[bug #27983] Windows text mode mis-interpreted

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #27983 (project findutils): Is the expectation in the test script valid? mount -t $(cygpath -w ${dir}) /textmode [..] tf1=/textmode/file1.txt tf2=/textmode/file2.txt [..] echo foo ${tf1} echo bar ${tf1} [..] cat ${tf1} | xargs -i echo -n =={}== ${tf2} [..]

[bug #27983] Windows text mode mis-interpreted

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #27983 (project findutils): In your example, $tf1 is created in text mode, so it contains file names listed with carriage returns. Then you use cat, which preserves binary mode, through a pipe which also preserves binary mode. But this is an example of a useless use

Re: assertion failures of findutils 4.5.7

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Kamil Dudka kdu...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, Sami Farin (CC'd) discovered some flaws in recent findutils and reported them at Red Hat bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579476#c0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579476#c2 Here

Re: Patch that adds a new test to find

Thank you very much for your kind and accurate answer! I have tried to modify my patch so as to solve the problems you pointed at. I know that looking at the content of a file is not in the spirit of find, but anyway I believe it is a very useful exercise for me to go and hack such an excellent

Re: Patch that adds a new test to find

diff -Nur findutils/find/cmp.c findutils-rreale/find/cmp.c --- findutils/find/cmp.c1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ findutils-rreale/find/cmp.c 2010-04-05 22:29:19.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,224 @@ +/* Buffer primitives for comparison operations. Adapted from the + following

Re: Patch that adds a new test to find

[it's customary to reply inline, rather than top-posting, on technical lists] On 04/05/2010 03:13 PM, rre...@iol.it wrote: Thank you very much for your kind and accurate answer! I have tried to modify my patch so as to solve the problems you pointed at. I know that looking at the content of

[PATCH] Use the getopt-gnu module, not the obsolete getopt module.

I've pushed the attached patch. 2010-04-06 James Youngman j...@gnu.org * import-gnulib.config (modules): Use the getopt-gnu module from gnulib rather than the (obsolete) getopt module. From 1284636a2e4e64cc57fe8241fa0ed290205843f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Youngman

Re: assertion failures of findutils 4.5.7

On Monday 05 of April 2010 22:01:22 James Youngman wrote: I attach a set of patches. They're the same as the patches I emailed yesterday, but rebased against current head. The patches look good! I've applied all of them and built as findutils-4.5.7-4.fc14. Thanks! Kamil