Also, issue debug ip icmp on routers 1, 2, and 4. You should see
packets sourced from 1.1.1.1 successfully arrive at R4, but R4 receives
a destination host unreachable from R2 when sending the reply. This
is because R2 doesn't care about the source of the network when
forwarding the ping to R4,
Brad,
I THINK route filtering using an access list is in the BGP section of
the DocCD, but I couldn't immediately find it. I did, however, find a
great article for you to reference written by a former IP Expert
instructor.
http://tcpmag.com/qanda/article.asp?EditorialsID=358
Hope this
Haha...sorry. An explanation would be nice :)
Basically, for each worksheet, you need to identify the spanning-tree root
bridge for the topology and then calculate the subsequent root ports,
designated ports, and blocked ports for each link and bridge. I usually use
R, D, and X respectively
For anyone interested, I labbed out the OSPF interface selection process where
two OSPF processes are configured to advertise out a single interface.
Basically, the first OSPF process in the router's config has priority over the
interface. The actual numerical value of the OSPF process has
True, but an offset-list will only allow you to add to the metric - not
rewrite it to whatever absolute value you want.
-Original Message-
From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy L.
Gaddis
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009
Paulo,
The set metric route-map option is not supported within EIGRP.
Check out the following link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t8/feature/guide/gteigrpr.
html#wp1058210
Every set metric example explicitly identifies BGP, OSPF, and RIP as
supported - not EIGRP. I am not
Roglio is correct. Check out the following link for additional info.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t2/feature/guide/ftqosvpn.
html
Also, the end-to-end QoS design book states that the TOS markings are
automatically copied to the tunnel header without any configuration, but
when
I miss the old logo. The new one looks like somebody from Microsoft
infiltrated the New Cisco Logo Design Task Force and had his/her way
with them.
-Original Message-
From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Wayne Lawson
Sent:
Matt,
Thanks for the response!
I have been using dynamips for quite a while and never had a persistent issue
like I am experiencing with R2 before. Something must be paramountly wrong
with something I am doing. Have you tried removing the scheduler allocate
commands from your configs (if
Iwan,
Yeah...the whole topology works with the exception of R2, which works until I
issue sho run a few times. At that point R2 locks up, but everything else
continues to function, including other devices that share the same hypervisor
with R2. Just for the h3ll of it, I loaded the
Jack,
Many people have passed the lab using dynamips only. I use dynamips for
90% of my study and rent lab time on real equipment for the remaining
10%. Dynamips supports the 16 port Fast Ethernet switching module,
which allows you to do about 85% of the switching stuff. The majority
of the
Gokhan,
I just moved from the DC area. I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but since
the majority of work out there is with the Federal Gov, specifically the
Defense industry, it maybe be extremely difficult to find a job in the area as
a foreign national - especially with the economy in the
How about IRB bridging across?
-Original Message-
From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Matt Hill
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 8:38 AM
To: Michael Lipsey
Cc: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Routing
Disregard, I didn't see the post about being you connecting to a
carrier's MPLS cloud.
How about EoMPLS? You should be able to tunnel it through your carrier.
-Original Message-
From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
Joe,
Thanks for the response!
For anyone who is curious, I dug up the original recommended read list
posted by Jared. He also did a follow-up blog post about 6 months
later.
http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/11/21/so-much-information-part-one/
At least you aren't taking your lab at RTP! Those dudes start EARLY out
there (7:30) and it is East Coast time. I feel sorry for the folks
traveling from the West Coast to take it - must be brutal.
Well, good luck!! Let us know how it goes!
p.s. Does the proctor in San Jose talk about his
Where is Jared?! Did you hear a rumor of him leaving? He was my bootcamp
instructor. I thought he was bright and did a good job.
I am perfecting my Australian accent to pick up chicks! :)
-Original Message-
From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Has anyone received this error while trying to print a lab book? This
is the first time I have tried to print
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
I am currently behind a restrictive proxy and firewall...probably the
issue. I will try printing from another location. If I still have
problems, I will contact support.
Thanks!
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: Joe Astorino [mailto:jastor...@ipexpert.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 29,
Joe,
On the topic of the new v4 material, do you know of or have a list of
recommended reading for folks to get them up-to-speed for the new exam?
I saw an old blog post from Jared S. with a really good list for the v3
blueprint, but don't recall seeing anything for the new stuff (I may be
Awesome write-up! Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of jmangawang
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 5:40 AM
To: CCIE OSL
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My lab v4.0 experience,for those of you dying
to know
Is anyone running the Version 11 labs on Dynamips? If so, are you using the
Version 10 .net file, or did you create one from scratch? I recently purchased
the v11 labs, which don't come with a .net file.
Thanks in advance!
-Original Message-
From:
I totally agree. On the last project I was on, we consolidated eight
racks of servers into one using Vmware. Saves space, power, and
hardware costs...super slick. The blade switch stuff was interesting to
configure.
-Original Message-
From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
23 matches
Mail list logo
