its just a guess.
There shouldn't be any problem setting 3+4 on one side and 2 on the
other side, so you can change that setting on your switch without
having to worry about other bonds set up on it break.
--
Marc 'risson' Schmitt
CRI - EPITA
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
ports instead mac and it works. But i
> dont know what will the effect and also my switch is layer2.
We are setting layer3+4 on both our servers and our switches.
Regards,
--
Marc 'risson' Schmitt
CRI - EPITA
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@c
Hi,
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 19:40:09 +0100
Marc 'risson' Schmitt wrote:
> Cephadm is supposed to include some default Prometheus configuration
> for alerting[1], if this configuration is present in the container. It
> gets the path to this configuration from
> `mgr/cephadm/prometheus
Quick follow-up on this,
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:58:41 +0100
Marc 'risson' Schmitt wrote:
> > Indeed. I just merged https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/39932
> > which fixes the names of those config keys.
Cephadm is supposed to include some default Prometheus configuration
fo
for your fix!
Regards,
--
Marc 'risson' Schmitt
CRI - EPITA
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
-configuration-files
Regards,
--
Marc 'risson' Schmitt
CRI - EPITA
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
