[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

Thank you all! We want to merge the PR with whitelisting added https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/55717 and will start the 16.2.15 build/release afterward. On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 8:25 AM Laura Flores wrote: > Thank you Junior for your thorough review of the RADOS suite. Aside from a > few

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

Thank you Junior for your thorough review of the RADOS suite. Aside from a few remaining warnings in the final run that could benefit from whitelisting, these are not blockers. Rados-approved. On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 9:29 AM Kamoltat Sirivadhna wrote: > details of RADOS run analysis: > >

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

details of RADOS run analysis: yuriw-2024-02-19_19:25:49-rados-pacific-release-distro-default-smithi 1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64455 task/test_orch_cli: Health check

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

RADOS approved On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 11:27 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Still seeking approvals: > > rados - Radek, Junior, Travis, Adam King > > All other product areas have been approved and are ready for the release > step. > > Pls also review the Release Notes:

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

Still seeking approvals: rados - Radek, Junior, Travis, Adam King All other product areas have been approved and are ready for the release step. Pls also review the Release Notes: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/55694 On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 7:58 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > We have

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 10:58 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > We have restarted QE validation after fixing issues and merging several PRs. > The new Build 3 (rebase of pacific) tests are summarized in the same > note (see Build 3 runs) https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64151#note-1 > > Seeking

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

dashboard approved. our e2e specs are passing but the suite failed because of a different error. cluster [WRN] Health check failed: 1 stray daemon(s) not managed by cephadm (CEPHADM_STRAY_DAEMON)" in cluster log On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 9:29 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > We have restarted QE

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

Hi Yuri, On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 9:29 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > We have restarted QE validation after fixing issues and merging several PRs. > The new Build 3 (rebase of pacific) tests are summarized in the same > note (see Build 3 runs) https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64151#note-1 > >

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 4:59 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > We have restarted QE validation after fixing issues and merging several PRs. > The new Build 3 (rebase of pacific) tests are summarized in the same > note (see Build 3 runs) https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64151#note-1 > > Seeking

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

We have restarted QE validation after fixing issues and merging several PRs. The new Build 3 (rebase of pacific) tests are summarized in the same note (see Build 3 runs) https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64151#note-1 Seeking approvals: rados - Radek, Junior, Travis, Ernesto, Adam King rgw - Casey

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

thanks, i've created https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64360 to track these backports to pacific/quincy/reef On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 7:50 AM Stefan Kooman wrote: > > Hi, > > Is this PR: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/54918 included as well? > > You definitely want to build the Ubuntu / debian

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

Hi, Is this PR: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/54918 included as well? You definitely want to build the Ubuntu / debian packages with the proper CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS. The performance impact on RocksDB is _HUGE_. Thanks, Gr. Stefan P.s. Kudos to Mark Nelson for figuring it out / testing.

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

We are still working through the remaining issues and will do a full cycle of testing soon. Adam, the issues mentioned by Ilya below require some response and resolution, pls take a look > rbd looks good overall but we are missing iSCSI coverage due to > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64126

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

> > On Feb 7, 2024, at 16:59, Zakhar Kirpichenko wrote: > > Indeed, it looks like it's been recently reopened. Thanks for this! Hi, It was merged yesterday Thanks for the right noise, k ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

Indeed, it looks like it's been recently reopened. Thanks for this! /Z On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 15:43, David Orman wrote: > That tracker's last update indicates it's slated for inclusion. > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2024, at 10:47, Zakhar Kirpichenko wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Please consider not leaving this

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

That tracker's last update indicates it's slated for inclusion. On Thu, Feb 1, 2024, at 10:47, Zakhar Kirpichenko wrote: > Hi, > > Please consider not leaving this behind: > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/55109 > > It's a serious bug, which potentially affects a whole node stability if >

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:23 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Update. > Seeking approvals/reviews for: > > rados - Radek, Laura, Travis, Adam King (see Laura's comments below) > rgw - Casey approved > fs - Venky approved > rbd - Ilya No issues in RBD, formal approval is pending on [1] which also

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

Hi, Please consider not leaving this behind: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/55109 It's a serious bug, which potentially affects a whole node stability if the affected mgr is colocated with OSDs. The bug was known for quite a while and really shouldn't be left unfixed. /Z On Thu, 1 Feb 2024

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

Thanks Laura, Raised a PR for https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/57386 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/55415 On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:15 AM Laura Flores wrote: > I reviewed the rados suite. @Adam King , @Nizamudeen A > would appreciate a look from you, as there are some > orchestrator and

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

Update. Seeking approvals/reviews for: rados - Radek, Laura, Travis, Adam King (see Laura's comments below) rgw - Casey approved fs - Venky approved rbd - Ilya krbd - Ilya upgrade/nautilus-x (pacific) - fixed by Casey upgrade/octopus-x (pacific) - Adam King is looking

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

I reviewed the rados suite. @Adam King , @Nizamudeen A would appreciate a look from you, as there are some orchestrator and dashboard trackers that came up. pacific-release, 16.2.15 Failures: 1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/62225 2. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64278 3.

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 4:39 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64151#note-1 > > Seeking approvals/reviews for: > > rados - Radek, Laura, Travis, Ernesto, Adam King > rgw - Casey rgw approved, thanks > fs - Venky > rbd -

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 9:24 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Update. > Seeking approvals/reviews for: > > rados - Radek, Laura, Travis, Ernesto, Adam King > rgw - Casey > fs - Venky > rbd - Ilya Hi Yuri, rbd looks good overall but we are missing iSCSI coverage due to

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 3:08 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64151#note-1 > > Seeking approvals/reviews for: > > rados - Radek, Laura, Travis, Ernesto, Adam King > rgw - Casey > fs - Venky fs approved. Failures are -

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

Update. Seeking approvals/reviews for: rados - Radek, Laura, Travis, Ernesto, Adam King rgw - Casey fs - Venky rbd - Ilya krbd - Ilya upgrade/nautilus-x (pacific) - Casey PTL (regweed tests failed) upgrade/octopus-x (pacific) - Casey PTL (regweed tests failed) upgrade/pacific-x (quincy) -

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

dashboard looks good! approved. Regards, Nizam On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 3:09 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64151#note-1 > > Seeking approvals/reviews for: > > rados - Radek, Laura, Travis, Ernesto, Adam King > rgw -

[ceph-users] Re: pacific 16.2.15 QE validation status

Hi Yuri, The ceph-volume failure is a valid bug. Investigating for the root cause of it and will submit a patch. Thanks! -- Guillaume Abrioux Software Engineer From: Yuri Weinstein Date: Monday, 29 January 2024 at 22:38 To: dev , ceph-users Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ceph-users] pacific 16.2.15 QE