[ceph-users] Re: Nic bonding (lacp) settings for ceph

2021-06-28 Thread Marc 'risson' Schmitt
On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 22:35:36 +0300 mhnx wrote: > To be clear. > I have stacked switch and this is my configuration. > > Bonding cluster: (hash 3+4) > Cluster nic1(10Gbe) -> Switch A > Cluster nic2(10Gbe) -> Switch B > > Bonding public: (hash 3+4) > Public nic1(10Gbe) -> Switch A > Public

[ceph-users] Re: Nic bonding (lacp) settings for ceph

2021-06-28 Thread mhnx
e Aggregator with 10Gbps ports, and have intelligent selection > depending on whether you have 20/10/2/1Gbps available. > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows 10 > > > > *From: *mhnx > *Sent: *28 June 2021 1

[ceph-users] Re: Nic bonding (lacp) settings for ceph

2021-06-28 Thread Andrew Walker-Brown
6 To: Marc 'risson' Schmitt<mailto:ris...@cri.epita.fr> Cc: Ceph Users<mailto:ceph-users@ceph.io> Subject: [ceph-users] Re: Nic bonding (lacp) settings for ceph Thanks for the answer. I'm into ad_select bandwitdh because we use osd nodes as rgw gateways, VMs and different applications. I h

[ceph-users] Re: Nic bonding (lacp) settings for ceph

2021-06-28 Thread mhnx
Thanks for the answer. I'm into ad_select bandwitdh because we use osd nodes as rgw gateways, VMs and different applications. I have seperate cluster (10+10Gbe) and public (10+10Gbe) network. I tested stable, bandwitdh and count. Results are clearly good with bandwitdh. Count is the worst option.

[ceph-users] Re: Nic bonding (lacp) settings for ceph

2021-06-28 Thread Marc 'risson' Schmitt
Hi, On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:47:19 +0300 mhnx wrote: > I've changed ad_select to bandwitdh and both nic is in use now but > layer2 hash prevents dual nic usage for between two nodes (because > layer2 using only Mac ). As I understand it, setting ad_select to bandwidth is only going to be useful