https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90195
>From f708694fc2686684589dca7b8f3738a117fc047e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:06:57 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Sema] Avoid an undesired pack expansion while
transforming
https://github.com/mizvekov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mizvekov wrote:
> @mizvekov We have a bunch of related issues, could you look at them
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+%22-frelaxed-template-template-args%22
> ?
Removed a bunch of duplicates. 4 issues remaining:
1) #36505 Is the issue we are fixing in
dyung wrote:
> @dyung Can you help me to comfirm whether the Windows builder is passing now?
> I don't have such environment. Thanks in advance!
Sure, I'll try it on our internal builder and see if it passes and let you know
the result.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90373
https://github.com/mizvekov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807
>From 4ee58efa0f154b531dcc674b6f4fe084182aa803 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 01:14:28 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Enable C++17 relaxed template template argument
wangpc-pp wrote:
@dyung Can you help me to comfirm whether the Windows builder is passing now? I
don't have such environment. Thanks in advance!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90373
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Pengcheng Wang (wangpc-pp)
Changes
Since C++14 has been released for about nine years and most standard
libraries have implemented sized deallocation functions, it's time to
make this feature default again.
This is another try of
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-coroutines
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx
Author: Pengcheng Wang (wangpc-pp)
Changes
Since C++14 has been released for about nine years and most standard
libraries have implemented sized deallocation functions, it's time to
make this feature default again.
https://github.com/wangpc-pp created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90373
Since C++14 has been released for about nine years and most standard
libraries have implemented sized deallocation functions, it's time to
make this feature default again.
This is another try of
wangpc-pp wrote:
I don't know why spr added so many reviewers... sorry for bothering.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84877
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/wangpc-pp closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84877
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/wangpc-pp updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84877
>From ec68548a470d6d9032a900a725e95b92691657b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wang Pengcheng
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:28:09 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
https://github.com/wangpc-pp edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84877
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nicovank updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89490
>From 129187f336bf6351dae4604d690809f4095a2e7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolas van Kempen
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 02:58:25 +
Subject: [PATCH] [run-clang-tidy.py] Refactor, add progress indicator, add
@@ -530,43 +527,43 @@ Now the linkage name of ``NS::foo()`` will be
``_ZN2NS3fooEv``.
Module Initializers
~~~
-All the importable module units are required to emit an initializer function.
-The initializer function should contain calls to importing modules
@@ -8,79 +8,60 @@ Standard C++ Modules
Introduction
-The term ``modules`` has a lot of meanings. For the users of Clang, modules may
-refer to ``Objective-C Modules``, ``Clang C++ Modules`` (or ``Clang Header
Modules``,
-etc.) or ``Standard C++ Modules``. The
@@ -577,15 +574,16 @@ the generated BMI specified by ``-o`` will be full BMI
and the BMI specified by
-> ...
-> consumer_n.cpp
-We don't emit diagnostics if
@@ -738,22 +736,21 @@ the following style significantly:
import M;
... // use declarations from module M.
-The key part of the tip is to reduce the duplications from the text includes.
+Reducing the duplication from textual includes is what improves compile-time
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 commented:
Big thanks!
I left some comments about correctness or clearness. And all other change looks
good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90237
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -8,79 +8,60 @@ Standard C++ Modules
Introduction
-The term ``modules`` has a lot of meanings. For the users of Clang, modules may
-refer to ``Objective-C Modules``, ``Clang C++ Modules`` (or ``Clang Header
Modules``,
-etc.) or ``Standard C++ Modules``. The
@@ -312,75 +300,76 @@ So all of the following name is not valid by default:
__test
// and so on ...
-If you still want to use the reserved module names for any reason, use
-``-Wno-reserved-module-identifier`` to suppress the warning.
+Using a reserved module name is
@@ -8,109 +8,91 @@ Standard C++ Modules
Introduction
-The term ``modules`` has a lot of meanings. For the users of Clang, modules may
-refer to ``Objective-C Modules``, ``Clang C++ Modules`` (or ``Clang Header
Modules``,
-etc.) or ``Standard C++ Modules``. The
@@ -925,45 +923,41 @@ In that case, you need to convert your source files (.cpp
files) to module imple
// Following off should be unchanged.
...
-The module implementation unit will import the primary module implicitly.
-We don't include any headers in the module
@@ -400,24 +389,27 @@ And the compilation process for module units are like:
mod1.cppm -> clang++ mod1.cppm ... -> mod1.pcm --,--> clang++
mod1.pcm ... -> mod1.o -+
src2.cpp +> clang++
src2.cpp --->
@@ -216,51 +198,56 @@ We explain the options in the following sections.
How to enable standard C++ modules
~~
-Currently, standard C++ modules are enabled automatically
-if the language standard is ``-std=c++20`` or newer.
+Standard C++ modules
@@ -8,109 +8,91 @@ Standard C++ Modules
Introduction
-The term ``modules`` has a lot of meanings. For the users of Clang, modules may
-refer to ``Objective-C Modules``, ``Clang C++ Modules`` (or ``Clang Header
Modules``,
-etc.) or ``Standard C++ Modules``. The
@@ -530,43 +527,43 @@ Now the linkage name of ``NS::foo()`` will be
``_ZN2NS3fooEv``.
Module Initializers
~~~
-All the importable module units are required to emit an initializer function.
-The initializer function should contain calls to importing modules
@@ -633,36 +630,37 @@ example:
// module M's interface, so is discarded
int c = use_h(); // OK
-In the above example, the function definition of ``N::g`` is elided from the
Reduced
-BMI of ``M.cppm``. Then the use of ``use_g`` in
@@ -312,75 +300,76 @@ So all of the following name is not valid by default:
__test
// and so on ...
-If you still want to use the reserved module names for any reason, use
-``-Wno-reserved-module-identifier`` to suppress the warning.
+Using a reserved module name is
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90237
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -530,43 +527,43 @@ Now the linkage name of ``NS::foo()`` will be
``_ZN2NS3fooEv``.
Module Initializers
~~~
-All the importable module units are required to emit an initializer function.
-The initializer function should contain calls to importing modules
nicovank wrote:
Reproduced the buffering issue on my setup, but flushing didn't fix the problem.
I could also reproduce with the current version of this script, which does also
flush after writing.
Python defaults input/output streams to buffered mode when it detects a pipe,
and I don't think
https://github.com/nicovank updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89490
>From 85700b3488ceb65adc73469c82137c1c3429b3f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolas van Kempen
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 02:58:25 +
Subject: [PATCH] [run-clang-tidy.py] Refactor, add progress indicator, add
igorkudrin wrote:
> I think out of tree builds of clang-tidy (back in the svn days, when people
> did partial checkouts of individual projects) probably needed this to be able
> to correctly correctly find the right headers. Maybe standalone builds aren't
> permitted anymore? I think I
https://github.com/lipracer approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90334
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vtjnash wrote:
I think out of tree builds of clang-tidy (back in the svn days, when people did
partial checkouts of individual projects) probably needed this to be able to
correctly correctly find the right headers. Maybe standalone builds aren't
permitted anymore? I think I mentioned this a
dwblaikie wrote:
C doesn't have an odr, does it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90298
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
offsetof wrote:
Yes, that would be great, thank you.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89484
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
Feel not bad.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90310
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
I have no idea why it was. But the current change looks pretty fine to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90298
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Igor Kudrin (igorkudrin)
Changes
The only reason for the removed condition was that there was a dependency for
`CTTestTidyModule` on the `clang-tidy-headers` target, which was only created
under the same `NOT
https://github.com/igorkudrin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90370
The only reason for the removed condition was that there was a dependency for
`CTTestTidyModule` on the `clang-tidy-headers` target, which was only created
under the same `NOT LLVM_INSTALL_TOOLCHAIN_ONLY`
HighCommander4 wrote:
@twmht To my knowledge, clang and clangd have only ever supported the
`@file.rsp` response file syntax.
The commands in the linked thread use the `--options-file file.rsp` syntax,
which clang and clangd do not support.
https://github.com/clangd/vscode-clangd/issues/592
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#90369
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89564
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/whentojump milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89564
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
whentojump wrote:
/cherry-pick c1b6cca1214e7a9c14a30b81585dd8b81baeaa77
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89564
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
Failed to cherry-pick: 53ff002c6f7ec64a75ab0990b1314cc6b4bb67cf
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/actions/runs/8863031679
Please manually backport the fix and push it to your github fork. Once this is
done, please create a [pull
tstellar wrote:
/cherry-pick 53ff002c6f7ec64a75ab0990b1314cc6b4bb67cf
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90139
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tstellar milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90139
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tstellar closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90139
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Tom Stellard
Date: 2024-04-27T15:32:58-07:00
New Revision: 53ff002c6f7ec64a75ab0990b1314cc6b4bb67cf
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/53ff002c6f7ec64a75ab0990b1314cc6b4bb67cf
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/53ff002c6f7ec64a75ab0990b1314cc6b4bb67cf.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: Owen Pan (owenca)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90363.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h (+6-2)
- (modified) clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp (+8-5)
https://github.com/owenca created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90363
None
>From 70e5f7df8711ac22450a441efe91ed7fa6e339f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 15:16:43 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format][NFC] Return early in isWordLike() for
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-04-27T15:14:20-07:00
New Revision: b4af01bada0c945906d85c364e12aceaf98b0fae
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b4af01bada0c945906d85c364e12aceaf98b0fae
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b4af01bada0c945906d85c364e12aceaf98b0fae.diff
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ class UncountedCallArgsChecker
bool shouldVisitImplicitCode() const { return false; }
bool TraverseDecl(Decl *D) {
-if (isa(D) && isRefType(safeGetName(D)))
+if (D && isa(D) && isRefType(safeGetName(D)))
return true;
@@ -2547,22 +2547,40 @@ usual build cycle when using sample profilers for
optimization:
used in the first step. The only requirement is that you build the code
with the same debug info options and ``-fprofile-sample-use``.
+ On Linux:
+
.. code-block:: console
https://github.com/tcreech-intel updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88438
>From fe3404cbdf78b434f16f8351dc242175b4543112 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Creech
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:03:52 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Improve documented sampling profiler steps to best known
rniwa wrote:
> Hey, do you think a regression test would be valuable?
Oh, that's a very good point. Added one.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90301
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90301
>From 0e9d10029e6d498d3bc5a319ac0945cf23db230d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:01:35 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fix a crash introduced by 3d5e9ab by adding a nullptr
check.
@@ -488,70 +493,72 @@ def main():
# Build up a big regexy filter from all command line arguments.
file_name_re = re.compile("|".join(args.files))
+files = {f for f in files if file_name_re.search(f)}
-return_code = 0
+returncode = 0
try:
-#
https://github.com/PiotrZSL commented:
One issue, looks like only stdout is buffered, and when clang-tidy output:
"26035 warnings generated.
Suppressed 26030 warnings (26030 in non-user code).
Use -header-filter=.* to display errors from all non-system headers. Use
-system-headers to display
https://github.com/PiotrZSL edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89490
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3893,9 +3893,12 @@ namespace {
}
void VisitCXXBindTemporaryExpr(const CXXBindTemporaryExpr *E) {
- if (E->getTemporary()->getDestructor()->isTrivial()) {
-Inherited::VisitStmt(E);
-return;
+ if (const CXXDestructorDecl *DtorDecl =
+
https://github.com/lelandjansen closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88810
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Piotr Zegar
Date: 2024-04-27T18:51:00Z
New Revision: 0336328e970e7e809d52a33a704bb7c05f6e170e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0336328e970e7e809d52a33a704bb7c05f6e170e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0336328e970e7e809d52a33a704bb7c05f6e170e.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/PiotrZSL closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89990
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Björn Svensson
Date: 2024-04-27T20:50:04+02:00
New Revision: 803cbcbc4029fc65188f6c1083a230341279b2d2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/803cbcbc4029fc65188f6c1083a230341279b2d2
DIFF:
@@ -269,6 +269,10 @@ Changes in existing checks
don't remove parentheses used in ``sizeof`` calls when they have array index
accesses as arguments.
+- Improved :doc:`modernize-use-nullptr
+ ` check to include support for
+ ``C23``, which also has introduced the
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Mital Ashok (MitalAshok)
Changes
Fixes #27059
Dependent function parameters, template parameters and exception declarations
that have qualified function types now error instead of silently decaying into
an invalid pointer type.
Also
https://github.com/MitalAshok created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90353
Fixes #27059
Dependent function parameters, template parameters and exception declarations
that have qualified function types now error instead of silently decaying into
an invalid pointer type.
Also fix
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov (Endilll)
Changes
Currently we're using official publication of CWG issue list available at
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_index.html. Unfortunately,
it's not updated as frequently as we sometimes
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90352
Currently we're using official publication of CWG issue list available at
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_index.html. Unfortunately,
it's not updated as frequently as we sometimes need. For
brandtbucher wrote:
Yep. I also updated the docs with the new register-passing order.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88333
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yronglin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90240
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yronglin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90240
>From 131783211a23d007b5b6f1d5691306df4dec716b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yronglin
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 01:38:34 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Clang] Fix incorrect handling of #pragma {GCC} unroll N
in
@@ -124,3 +124,40 @@ void test(int *List, int Length) {
#pragma unroll
/* expected-error {{expected statement}} */ }
+
+using size_t = unsigned long long;
+
+template
yronglin wrote:
I've keep test case in this file, because clang currently has this issue
https://github.com/yronglin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90240
>From 131783211a23d007b5b6f1d5691306df4dec716b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yronglin
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 01:38:34 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang] Fix incorrect handling of #pragma {GCC} unroll N
in
https://github.com/yronglin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90240
>From 131783211a23d007b5b6f1d5691306df4dec716b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yronglin
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 01:38:34 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] Fix incorrect handling of #pragma {GCC} unroll N
in
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 approved this pull request.
LGTM in code. I am not a native English speaker so I can't review the
documentation very well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86448
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90279
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
komalverma04 wrote:
@5chmidti Please take a look at it.
Thank You
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89553
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ivanmurashko edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90319
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
yronglin wrote:
I have question, for the case `#pragma unroll {0|1}`, which AST attribute node
make sense?
1.
```
LoopHintAttr 0x14b0bae08 Implicit unroll Unroll Disable
```
or
2.
```
LoopHintAttr 0x15780a408 Implicit unroll UnrollCount
Numeric
```
Do we need accurate AST or real semantics
https://github.com/ivanmurashko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90319
>From e8e9502f117d5559c4da225b0e24fe6db9c27751 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Murashko
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 22:45:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [Modules] Process include files changes with
@@ -109,16 +109,20 @@ static Attr *handleLoopHintAttr(Sema , Stmt *St, const
ParsedAttr ,
SetHints(LoopHintAttr::Unroll, LoopHintAttr::Disable);
} else if (PragmaName == "unroll") {
// #pragma unroll N
-if (ValueExpr && !ValueExpr->isValueDependent()) {
-
@@ -109,16 +109,20 @@ static Attr *handleLoopHintAttr(Sema , Stmt *St, const
ParsedAttr ,
SetHints(LoopHintAttr::Unroll, LoopHintAttr::Disable);
} else if (PragmaName == "unroll") {
// #pragma unroll N
-if (ValueExpr && !ValueExpr->isValueDependent()) {
-
@@ -124,3 +124,40 @@ void test(int *List, int Length) {
#pragma unroll
/* expected-error {{expected statement}} */ }
+
+using size_t = unsigned long long;
+
+template
yronglin wrote:
Agree!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90240
https://github.com/ivanmurashko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90319
>From ee4153f6b828c40a56b5b35d6e42cd193a1b5c31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Murashko
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 22:45:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [Modules] Process include files changes with
phoebewang wrote:
> For driver tests we prefer specifying a concrete target triple than making a
> test dependent on the default target triple (controlled by `REQUIES:
> coff-supported-target` in this case).
>
> A concrete target triple (e.g. x86_64-windows) loses coverage for
>
https://github.com/phoebewang updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88245
>From 569c7dfee58f7e4357d8af45b52a3135cb4e2e65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Phoebe Wang
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:38:49 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] "Reland "[Win32][ELF] Make CodeView a DebugInfoFormat
only
https://github.com/phoebewang updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88245
>From 569c7dfee58f7e4357d8af45b52a3135cb4e2e65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Phoebe Wang
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:38:49 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] "Reland "[Win32][ELF] Make CodeView a DebugInfoFormat
only
https://github.com/ivanmurashko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90319
>From ee4153f6b828c40a56b5b35d6e42cd193a1b5c31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Murashko
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 22:45:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [Modules] Process include files changes with
https://github.com/phoebewang updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88245
>From 569c7dfee58f7e4357d8af45b52a3135cb4e2e65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Phoebe Wang
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:38:49 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] "Reland "[Win32][ELF] Make CodeView a DebugInfoFormat
only
https://github.com/phoebewang updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88245
>From 569c7dfee58f7e4357d8af45b52a3135cb4e2e65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Phoebe Wang
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:38:49 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] "Reland "[Win32][ELF] Make CodeView a DebugInfoFormat
only
https://github.com/phoebewang updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88245
>From 569c7dfee58f7e4357d8af45b52a3135cb4e2e65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Phoebe Wang
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:38:49 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] "Reland "[Win32][ELF] Make CodeView a DebugInfoFormat
only
https://github.com/phoebewang updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88245
>From 569c7dfee58f7e4357d8af45b52a3135cb4e2e65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Phoebe Wang
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:38:49 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] "Reland "[Win32][ELF] Make CodeView a DebugInfoFormat
only
https://github.com/yronglin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89942
>From 8c5f1d0f92d77bffec88759c19133a0bac130f32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yronglin
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 23:36:10 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [Clang] Implement P2748R5 "Disallow Binding a Returned
Glvalue
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-sparc
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Koakuma (koachan)
Changes
Make sure that empty structs are treated as if it has a size of one bit in
function parameters and return types so that it occupies a full argument and/or
return
https://github.com/koachan created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90338
Make sure that empty structs are treated as if it has a size of one bit in
function parameters and return types so that it occupies a full argument and/or
return register slot.
This fixes crashes and
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
