On Wed, 24 May 2006, felix winkelmann wrote:
On 5/23/06, Frédéric Peschanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] Finally, I don't really understand which commands I should use
for compilation :
[...]
- of the library .o == .so
csc X.o Y.o -s -o libXY.so
[...]
Hello,
as I already pointed
Hi,
I'm building chicken and found a slight problem with the Makefile.
The variable sed_quote_subst didn't handle my CFLAGS properly, since
I'm using the -mfpmath=sse,387 option. I fixed it by changing the
variable to include a comma:
Makefile: line 1628 after rule csc.scm: csc.scm.in
I need to determine the most positive and most negative fixnums,
given that Chicken has both 32-bit and 64-bit builds. Can these
be added as constants, or is there some easy way to compute them?
I used the following:
(use format)
(define (find type)
(let loop ((i type) (mult 2))
On 5/24/06, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can also combine multiple library units into a static library:
% ar cru libxy.a x.o y.o
% csc z.scm -L. -lxy
This, however, pukes on Cygwin as follows:
./libxy.a(y.o): In function `C_y_toplevel':
/tmp/y.c:56: undefined reference to
On 5/23/06, Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 7:14 AM, John Cowan wrote:
I need to determine the most positive and most negative fixnums,
given that Chicken has both 32-bit and 64-bit builds. Can these
be added as constants, or is there some easy way to compute them?
felix winkelmann scripsit:
Right, sth like:
(define most-positive-fixnum (foreign-value C_MOST_POSITIVE_FIXNUM
int))
(define most-negative-fixnum (foreign-value C_MOST_NEGATIVE_FIXNUM
int))
should do the job.
Thanks! It works.
(felix)
Felix?
Felix?
/me shakes Felix.
Oh dear!
Wed, 24 May 2006 12:13:25 + (GMT), chust wrote:
as I already pointed out in my earlier reply to this thread (which is
apparently, like so often these days, delayed forever by the mailing list
software)
Not the software, it's us, the moderators who sometimes get lost among
20 spam mails
On Wed, 24 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wed, 24 May 2006 12:13:25 + (GMT), chust wrote:
as I already pointed out in my earlier reply to this thread (which is
apparently, like so often these days, delayed forever by the mailing list
software)
Not the software, it's us, the
On May 24, 2006, at 9:25 AM, Matthew David Parker wrote:
Hi I've got functions for my SDL layer that I want to put like this:
(define msdl.pixel
(case-lambda
(() (printf (msdl.pixel x y rgb alpha [img])\n))
((x y rgb alpha)
Ex: (w/ csi)
#;1 (define (msdl.pixel x y rgb alpha #!optional (img 0)) 'foo)
#;2 (procedure-information msdl.pixel)
(msdl.pixel x y rgb alpha #!optional (img 0))
#;3 (msdl.pixel 3)
Error: too few arguments - received 1 but expected 4: #procedure
(msdl.pixel x y rgb alpha #!optional (img
On May 24, 2006, at 10:33 AM, Matthew David Parker wrote:
Ex: (w/ csi)
#;1 (define (msdl.pixel x y rgb alpha #!optional (img 0)) 'foo)
#;2 (procedure-information msdl.pixel)
(msdl.pixel x y rgb alpha #!optional (img 0))
#;3 (msdl.pixel 3)
Error: too few arguments - received 1 but expected
Alright I'll just use case-lambda for portability reasons. I'm sure the
delay from using case-lambda is minimal compared to the time it takes to
actually write a pixel to the screen or draw a rectangle.
Matt
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Kon Lovett wrote:
On May 24, 2006, at 10:33 AM, Matthew David
Having gotten tired of parsing through google results with the words 'scheme' and 'soap', I figure I'll ask here.
Is there a standard library or reference for implementing soap services and clients in scheme?
thanks
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Hi again. Happy to report that everything is working on the new
readline egg (paren bouncing, tab completion, some other odds and
ends). However, I have two questions:
- I'm using C_find_symbol_table and C_enumerate_symbols to get the
symbols for tab completion, which work great, but they
14 matches
Mail list logo
