Re: [Chicken-users] another egg

2016-01-05 Thread Caolan McMahon
> Great to learn that you are still around here and caring for the egg. > > If you like those changes, please pull them in. This would have the > advantage to reduce clutter/pollution of the eggs listing. > > Pls. notify the list. If you pull those changes in Mario should _not_ > include mine

[Chicken-users] Eggs metafile needs another property - doesn't it?

2016-01-05 Thread Jörg F . Wittenberger
Hi all, I need to specify a certain - not yet available - version of chicken itself as the minimum requirement for an egg to work for real. (((Backgground: Hacking away on this RPi gpio egg I created a version which exacerbates an issue I fixed the other day - see ticket 1232. To improve at the

Re: [Chicken-users] another egg

2016-01-05 Thread Jörg F . Wittenberger
Hi all, for the time being (as we shall not have yet another gpio egg). There is a 1.1.0 version of the raspberry-pi-gpio-small egg now here: http://askemos.org/chicken-eggs/raspberry-pi-gpio-small.release-info latest source here:

Re: [Chicken-users] Eggs metafile needs another property - doesn't it?

2016-01-05 Thread Jörg F . Wittenberger
Argh, wait... Am 05.01.2016 um 21:09 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger: > Hi all, > > I need to specify a certain - not yet available - version of chicken > itself as the minimum requirement for an egg to work for real. as I sent the message I re-read http://wiki.call-cc.org/Metafile%20reference

Re: [Chicken-users] Eggs metafile needs another property - doesn't it?

2016-01-05 Thread Christian Kellermann
* Jörg F. Wittenberger [160105 21:18]: > Argh, wait... > > Am 05.01.2016 um 21:09 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger: > > Hi all, > > > > I need to specify a certain - not yet available - version of chicken > > itself as the minimum requirement for an egg to work for

Re: [Chicken-users] Using fmt and numbers eggs together

2016-01-05 Thread Alex Shinn
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Peter Bex wrote: > On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 11:40:47AM -0500, Sudarshan S Chawathe wrote: > > I seem to get incorrect output and errors in some cases when using the > > fmt and numbers eggs together. A brief transcript illustrating the > >