Re: Generalized-Arrays egg v1.0.1

On 2/3/24 16:03, John Cowan wrote: On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 5:39 PM Jeremy Steward > wrote:  Likewise, I opt to use (chicken fixnum) but this is because I discovered that SRFI-143 is so egregiously slower than (chicken fixnum) that it was causing

Re: Generalized-Arrays egg v1.0.1

On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 5:39 PM Jeremy Steward wrote: Likewise, I opt to use (chicken fixnum) but this is > because I discovered that SRFI-143 is so egregiously slower than > (chicken fixnum) that it was causing serious performance regressions in > many of the array APIs. > That's very odd. The

Generalized-Arrays egg v1.0.1

Hi all! After about ~6 months of work, I've finally rewritten the generalized-arrays egg and am today releasing v1.0.1. You can find the repo at: I learned a lot from this rewrite, but here's a few highlights: 1. The egg is MUCH

Re: chicken (un)install, deployment

Hi Al, On Sat, 3 Feb 2024 12:22:46 +0200 Al wrote: > I'd like to distribute a project that uses chicken and a number of > eggs. In the Makefile, I'm trying to add a target that ensures the > user has those eggs installed. However, > > * chicken-install seems to proceed unconditionally (even if

chicken (un)install, deployment

 Hi, I'd like to distribute a project that uses chicken and a number of eggs. In the Makefile, I'm trying to add a target that ensures the user has those eggs installed. However, * chicken-install seems to proceed unconditionally (even if egg is already installed). * I see no