On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Chris Evans cev...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
I found this interesting: http://a.qoid.us/google.html
Because it's clearly very non-JavaScript focused (just a CSS rotation) and
yet the browsers exhibit very different performance characteristics.
All on my
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.org wrote:
I imagine the problems on Linux are the same as they were on Windows,
where the underlying graphics layer wants to place glyphs aligned on
pixel boundaries. This gives rounding problems and the letters jump
around. I
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.org wrote:
I imagine the problems on Linux are the same as they were on Windows,
where the underlying graphics layer wants to place glyphs aligned on
pixel
Hi,
I found this interesting: http://a.qoid.us/google.html
Because it's clearly very non-JavaScript focused (just a CSS rotation) and
yet the browsers exhibit very different performance characteristics.
All on my underpowered Windows laptop,
Chrome 3 4: smooth. Very nice anti-aliased accurate
Chromium is spending nearly all of its time inside Skia, so it's likely Skia
vs CG differences:
Welcome to pprof! For help, type 'help'.
(pprof) top
Total: 1590 samples
592 37.2% 37.2% 592 37.2% SkRegion::Spanerator::Spanerator
89 5.6% 42.8% 89 5.6% sk_memset32_SSE2
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Chris Evans cev...@chromium.org wrote:
The other browsers do not support the CSS used / required for this demo.
There was a similar version, but using SVG animation to do something very
