Re: Changing file system for Cloud images to ext4, xfs or something custom

On 4/9/24 10:00, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 9:53 AM Tadej Janež wrote: >> >> Hey Fedora Cloud WG! >> >> Firstly, thanks for providing Fedora for the popular cloud providers! >> >> Since Fedora 35, the Fedora Cloud images use btrfs by default [1]. >> For my deployments, I would

Re: Heads-up / for discussion: dnf not working with 1G of RAM or less

On 8/22/22 20:44, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! I apologize for the wide distribution, but this seemed like > a bug it'd be appropriate to get a wide range of input on. > > There's a bug that was proposed as an F37 Beta blocker: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1907030 > >

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup

Hi Cloud WG, This week I'd like to add an agenda item to discuss a potential change to the way we handle the default hostname in Fedora. Thanks! ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Cloud tooling (sub)SIG?

On 11/18/21 5:39 AM, Mikel Olasagasti wrote: > Hi all, Hi Mikel, Nice to meet you. > > First mail to fedora-cloud, so I'll present myself as a Red Hat > employee that contributes to Fedora in my free time. > > Last week I contacted Major Hayden about $SUJECT and he suggested > discussing it

Re: Any reason fedora server isn't uploaded to all regions?

On 10/15/21 12:19 PM, Carl Hörberg wrote: > Didn't know about the marketplace option, thanks! > > Not sure if there's any difference or release delay with the marketplace > option? In that case the regions we're missing are: > > Canada (Montreal) > EU (Stockholm) > EU (Paris) > EU (Milan) >

Re: Any reason fedora server isn't uploaded to all regions?

On 10/15/21 10:25 AM, Carl Hörberg wrote: > Hi, we looking into moving from ubuntu to Fedora server for thousands of our > servers on AWS, but I wondering if the AWS images could be uploaded to all > AWS regions instead of just the few? Happy to contribute financially or > technically if

Re: Fedora website - revamp

On 6/21/21 2:31 PM, Pawel Zelawski wrote: > Dear team, > we decided it's time to rethink our needs and redesign Fedora main website > from scratch. > I would like to encourage your team to take a part in this initiative and > work on this together as we need to make sure that we have everybody

New Meeting Time

We're going to try out a new meeting time to try to overcome existing conflicts. The new time is on Thursdays (starting July 8th) at 1500UTC. See https://pagure.io/cloud-sig/issue/333 See you in the meeting! Dusty ___ cloud mailing list --

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2021-06-22

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-06-22/fedora_cloud_meeting.2021-06-22-15.59.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-06-22/fedora_cloud_meeting.2021-06-22-15.59.txt Log:

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2021-06-08

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-06-08/fedora_cloud_meeting.2021-06-08-16.07.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-06-08/fedora_cloud_meeting.2021-06-08-16.07.txt Log:

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2021-05-11

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-05-11/fedora_cloud_meeting.2021-05-11-15.58.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-05-11/fedora_cloud_meeting.2021-05-11-15.58.txt Log:

Fedora 34 GCP image

FYI - I published the Fedora 34 GCP image to the `fedora-cloud` project in GCP. See https://pagure.io/cloud-sig/issue/328 for more details. Currently you do have to provide cloud-init userdata to the instance (via the user-data key). This hopefully won't be the case once we include the newly

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2021-04-27

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-04-27/fedora_cloud_meeting.2021-04-27-15.59.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-04-27/fedora_cloud_meeting.2021-04-27-15.59.txt Log:

Re: Fix fallocate issue on cloud-init 19.4 for Fedora 33 cloud images

On 4/26/21 10:17 AM, Federico Ressi wrote: > Hello all, Hey Frederico, > > I am writing to this list because I found out F33 cloud image cloud init > support for creating swap files looks to be broken probably because of a > known Linux 5.7+ kernel issue [1]. > > The problem is cloud-init

Re: systemd update breaks DNS resolution on Fedora 33 cloud instances

On 1/15/21 2:50 PM, Tadej Janež wrote: > Hi all! Hey Tadej > > I was recently hit by this and it took me some time to figure out what > was going on. Thanks for sharing and for investigating. > > I provisioned a fresh Fedora 33 cloud instance on DigitalOcean. > After completing the initial

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2021-03-30

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-03-30/fedora_cloud_meeting.2021-03-30-16.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-03-30/fedora_cloud_meeting.2021-03-30-16.00.txt Log:

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2020-12-08

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-12-08/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-12-08-16.02.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-12-08/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-12-08-16.02.txt Log:

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup

I won't be able to make it tomorrow. Anyone else want to run the meeting? Dusty On 11/22/20 11:00 AM, du...@dustymabe.com wrote: > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2020-11-24 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 UTC >At

Fedora 33 in GCP

We have published an image into GCP for Fedora 33 (see [1]). The details are: image project: fedora-cloud image name:fedora-cloud-base-gcp-33-1-2-x86-64 We're hoping to get this information added to the website at some point. Dusty [1] https://pagure.io/cloud-sig/issue/318

Re: Issue on Fedora Cloud 32 & 33 cloud-init

Responded in the bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895461#c1 On 11/9/20 7:10 AM, Oliver Falk wrote: > Hi! > > I'm watching the BZ now. I hope Dusty finds some time to look into it! > > Oliver > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 6:54 PM Edouard >

Re: Can't use F33 EC2 image: SSH key doesn't work

On 11/9/20 3:40 PM, Kevin White wrote: > AWS's EC2 launch process can inject an SSH key into an image, however, it can > only inject RSA keys. It won't accept anything else. > > Fedora 33 doesn't allow RSA keys for SSH. > > Thus, when I launch an F33 image in EC2 (using the Cloud images,

Fedora 33 final AMIs

Fedora-Cloud-Base-33-1.2.x86_64 ap-northeast-1 ami-0d3ac0b331a940336 hvm gp2 Fedora-Cloud-Base-33-1.2.x86_64 ap-northeast-2 ami-09256ce41c4d2a8a6 hvm gp2 Fedora-Cloud-Base-33-1.2.x86_64 ap-south-1

Re: Fedora 33 Cloud image bug? Or new packaging "feature"?

On 10/29/20 6:45 PM, Mike Savage wrote: > Hi, Hi Mike, > > I have some Ansible code that inspects qcow images to verify the distro and > version via shell --> virt-inspector...and then set facts for use later on > in the code. However, upon downloading Fedora-Cloud-Base-33-1.2.x86_64.qcow2

Cloud Meeting Canceled 2020-10-27

Hey All, We're cancelling the cloud meeting because a good number of us can't make it. See you in two weeks. Dusty P.S. Fedora 33 was released today. Go grab the new stuff! https://alt.fedoraproject.org/cloud/ ___ cloud mailing list --

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2020-10-13

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-10-13/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-10-13-16.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-10-13/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-10-13-16.00.txt Log:

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2020-09-29

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-09-29/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-09-29-15.58.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-09-29/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-09-29-15.58.txt Log:

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2020-09-15

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-09-15/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-09-15-16.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-09-15/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-09-15-16.00.txt Log:

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2020-08-18

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-08-18/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-08-18-15.58.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-08-18/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-08-18-15.58.txt Log:

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2020-08-04

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-08-04/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-08-04-16.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-08-04/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-08-04-16.00.txt Log:

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2020-07-21

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-07-21/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-07-21-15.59.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-07-21/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-07-21-15.59.txt Log:

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2020-07-07

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-07-07/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-07-07-16.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-07-07/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-07-07-16.00.txt Log:

Re: Building local cloud image

On 6/12/20 10:20 PM, Michael Hall wrote: > Just wondering what the current best platform is for building Fedora > cloud-base images (specifically, for AWS). We're looking at potentially doing > this as part of a community college IT course, then contributing the > documented process back to

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2020-05-27

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-05-26/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-05-26-15.59.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-05-26/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-05-26-15.59.txt Log:

Re: Fedora Cloud Info

On 5/18/20 2:56 AM, Michael Hall wrote: > Hi Hi Michael, > > I am an instructor in a community college in Australia. We are making > increasing use of Fedora Cloud images in our practical labs on AWS. > > Fedora just works and has been a great option for us, but we're wondering if > there is

Re: Commit access to fedora-cloud / official-images

On 4/30/20 3:11 PM, Vipul Siddharth wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 12:39 AM Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> >> >> Which repo? > oops, should have added a link > https://github.com/fedora-cloud/official-images/ > Thank you for a super fast response Dusty I added

Re: Commit access to fedora-cloud / official-images

On 4/30/20 3:04 PM, Vipul Siddharth wrote: > Hi folks, Hi Vipul, Good to meet you! > I want to help with updating Fedora's dockerhub official image ~once > in every 2 weeks. Are you referring to our container images? The Cloud SIG doesn't really deal specifically with those, but more the

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2020-04-28

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-04-28/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-04-28-15.32.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-04-28/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-04-28-15.32.txt Log:

Re: Fedora 32 Final validation testing: Cloud

On 4/15/20 3:42 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! So I'm checking over the F32 Final validation test results > for the current RC (1.3) and one thing we're missing is Cloud tests: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_32_RC_1.3_Cloud > > so far we only have the results

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2020-04-14

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-04-14/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-04-14-15.35.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-04-14/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-04-14-15.35.txt Log:

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2020-03-31

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-03-31/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-03-31-15.30.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-03-31/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-03-31-15.30.txt Log:

Re: Fedora 32 Cloud Test Day 2020-03-20

On 3/19/20 2:54 PM, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Hey All, > > Fedora 32 Cloud Test Day is underway! > > A test day is an event where anyone can help make sure that changes in > Fedora are working well in the upcoming release. Fedora community > members often participate, but the public is

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2020-03-17

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-03-17/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-03-17-15.31.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-03-17/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-03-17-15.31.txt Log:

Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2020-03-10

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-03-10/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-03-10-14.31.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-03-10/fedora_cloud_meeting.2020-03-10-14.31.txt Log:

Re: Fedora 31 - Cockpit - AWS

On 3/7/20 10:40 PM, Michael Hall wrote: > Hi Hi Michael, Thanks for reaching out. > > I have created an EC2 instance on AWS using the official Fedora 31 cloud > image. > I installed cockpit and opened port 9090 in the security group. > I created a user account and gave it a password. > I

Re: No swap on Vagrant images. On purpose?

On 2/13/20 11:25 AM, Vincent Rubiolo wrote: > Hi Dusty, > > On 2/12/20 4:43 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> This is mostly because the cloud images don't configure any swap and we keep >> our >> image builds for the vagrant boxes and for the cloud images pretty much the &g

Re: No swap on Vagrant images. On purpose?

On 2/10/20 9:26 AM, Vincent Rubiolo [IoT.bzh] wrote: > Good afternoon everyone, > > I am currently using the nice Fedora 30 Vagrant boxes[1] to host some > local dev environment (doing builds) and stumbled upon the fact that the > machines do not provide any swap partition/space (cf attached

Re: earlyoom by default

On 1/8/20 5:21 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 7:56 PM Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> For cloud at least it's very common to not have swap. I'd argue for servers >> you don't want them swapping either but resources aren't quite as elastic as >> in the clo

Re: earlyoom by default

On 1/6/20 1:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > Hi server@ and cloud@ folks, > > There is a system-wide change to enable earlyoom by default on Fedora > Workstation. It came up in today's Workstation working group meeting > that I should give you folks a heads up about opting into this change. Thanks

Re: Automatic Network Configuration in Cloud with NetworkManager (nm-cloud-setup)

On 11/27/19 4:50 PM, Thomas Haller wrote: > Hello, > > > We (NetworkManager) are working on a tool that should help configuring > NetworkManager in cloud. > > This is for example for configuring the secondary IP addresses on > AWS/EC2 ([1], [2]) > > [1] >

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Nearing End Of Life

On 11/25/19 11:41 AM, Normand wrote: > > > On 11/21/19 11:33 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> This content also exists at: >> https://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2019/11/fedora-atomic-host-nearing-eol/ >> >> Last year we [introduced the plans for Fedora CoreOS] [1] incl

Fedora Atomic Host Nearing End Of Life

This content also exists at: https://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2019/11/fedora-atomic-host-nearing-eol/ Last year we [introduced the plans for Fedora CoreOS] [1] including that Fedora CoreOS would be the successor to Fedora Atomic Host and Container Linux (from CoreOS Inc.). As part of that

Re: rawhide vagrant box will not start

On 11/21/19 4:59 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: Hi Pavel > I'm trying to run rawhide vagrant box from [1] but rawhide composes do > not work correctly (vagrant up gets stuck) since August. > > I opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771446 against > kernel but I've been told

Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

On 11/1/19 5:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2019-07-29 at 14:58 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:16 PM Adam Williamson >> wrote: >>> OK, so, to move forward with this (and looping in cloud list): does >>> someone want to propose a set (ideally small - 2 would be

Fedora 31 final AMIs

Fedora-Cloud-Base-31-1.9.x86_64 ap-northeast-1ami-0d8e872ddc3206741 hvm gp2 Fedora-Cloud-Base-31-1.9.x86_64 ap-northeast-2ami-08a47fe608e852f01 hvm gp2 Fedora-Cloud-Base-31-1.9.x86_64 ap-south-1ami-0a0a5815e614466e4 hvm gp2

AMIs for F31 candidate RC 1.8

Fedora-Cloud-Base-31-1.8.aarch64 eu-west-1ami-052a5e155993e375a hvm gp2 Fedora-Cloud-Base-31-1.8.aarch64 us-east-1ami-07cb56e4404050d62 hvm gp2 Fedora-Cloud-Base-31-1.8.aarch64 us-east-2ami-025d7bc11b02af9cb hvm gp2

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20191001.0

On 10/2/19 5:25 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 29.20191001.0 > Commit(x86_64): > 15b8a10f8b587c2a037a592806dc04e9cdf6ab1c73c6e49fdaacab1b1174b9ab > Commit(aarch64): >

Re: EC2 access for testing?

On 9/13/19 4:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 16:25 -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> On 9/13/19 3:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> Hi folks! We're currently still discussing adjusting the release >>> criteria to explicitly require Fedora

Re: EC2 access for testing?

On 9/13/19 3:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! We're currently still discussing adjusting the release > criteria to explicitly require Fedora releases to boot in EC2. Someone > pointed out that if we're going to require that, it would be good if we > had an account allowing EC2 access

Re: [atomic-announce] Fedora Atomic 29 EOL date?

On 8/24/19 6:27 AM, Feilong Wang wrote: > Hi team, > Hi Feilong! I'm adding in Spyros who has worked with us in the past on Atomic Host and Magnum. > Could you please help me understand when will be the EOL date for Fedora > Atomic 29? I understand generally it takes 13 months. But given

Re: Fedora 30 cloud image inline_data

On 8/13/19 5:40 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote: > Hi, > > As the base image has a lot of small files, did someone test what is the > influence of setting ext4 feature inline_data? > > Are there other reasons why this feature is not active by default? > > And: > > Why are there so many duplicate

Re: Xen / EC2 release criteria proposal

On 8/9/19 8:56 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! I'm starting a new thread for this to trim the recipient > list a bit and include devel@ and coreos@. Hey Adam! > > The Story So Far: there is a Fedora release criterion which requires > Fedora to boot on Xen: > > "The release must boot

Re: cloud-init regression F30 cloud image

On 8/7/19 4:48 PM, Michael Gugino wrote: > Looks like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596062 has > come back based on my testing on GCE. > > https://pagure.io/cloud-sig/issue/289 > > logs: https://gist.github.com/michaelgugino/342f08608c4795c8241d38d9a72e3261 > > related bug:

Re: [atomic-devel] Failed to deploy/upgrade on Fedora Atomic 29

On 7/15/19 10:33 PM, Feilong Wang wrote: > Hello, could anybody please take a look at this issue? Thanks. Hi Feilong, > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 9:43 AM Feilong Wang > wrote: > > Hi team, > > Now I'm testing upgrade for Fedora Atomic 29 image, but when I

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190625.0

On 6/25/19 1:38 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 29.20190625.0 > Commit(x86_64): > c50cc86ad7972f85853f1deafda3899eb86a0e5220c613744eed64320298716e > Commit(aarch64): >

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190516.0

On 5/16/19 6:27 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 29.20190516.0 > Commit(x86_64): > 7f719bf60b865ca96aacd0e8ae3e6074c7eb5783d8ceb9003dbba5dfd5a29ba3 > Commit(aarch64): >

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190513.0

On 5/15/19 8:25 AM, Sven Kieske wrote: > Hi, > > is there a reason why _all_ links below: > > https://getfedora.org/en/atomic/* > > are dead? > > I always get, e.g.: > > Not Found > > The requested URL /en/atomic/download/ was not found on this server. > Apache Server at getfedora.org Port

Re: Fedora 30 Beta Release Readiness meeting

On 3/15/19 5:23 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > Is Silverblue on the same go-no go schedule as the rest of the versions? yes ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Fedora Cloud SIG github organization

On 3/7/19 2:56 PM, Clement Verna wrote: > Hi all, > > For a while now I take care to update the Fedora container image on Docker > Hub using this repo https://github.com/fedora-cloud/docker-brew-fedora. I > would like to make this a bit easier and self serviced using a jenkins > pipeline.

Re: Cloud/Server merge

On 1/29/19 7:20 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Okay, we've talked about this but not actually done anything because > everyone is busy. Here's my proposal for F30: not actually do anything > different, but, we are redesigning the website, and I think we should > consolidate Cloud into the Fedora

Re: Fedora 29 Atomic and Cloud Test Day on Monday, 1st October

On 09/28/2018 12:42 PM, Sinny Kumari wrote: > Hi all, > > We are organizing Atomic and Cloud Test Day on Monday, 1st October. This > Test Day is to make sure that Atomic Host and Cloud artifacts are working as > expected in Fedora 29. If something is broken, we catch it and fix them as > soon

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180917.0

On 09/17/2018 03:19 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180917.0 > Commit(x86_64): > 17b11d74047ded1264a57555a64ae6fc5d02a332c556679bfcf32864fc91f11e > Commit(aarch64): >

Re: Man pages in cloud images - documentation

On 06/29/2018 03:23 AM, Gergely Gombos wrote: > > So my solution proposal: > > * > I'm going to create PRs to add this piece of info to the Scaleway Fedora > (https://github.com/scaleway/image-fedora), Docker Brew > (https://github.com/fedora-cloud/docker-brew-fedora), and possibly

Re: Man pages in cloud images - documentation

On 06/28/2018 05:38 AM, Gergely Gombos wrote: > Hello, Hi Greg, > > I just installed a F28 image on a Scaleway cloud server. Runs fine, except > there were no man pages, even after installing man-pages package. > > It turned out after a lot of searching that this is not a bug but a feature.

Re: More frequent Fedora Cloud updates

On 06/18/2018 03:25 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:21 PM, Joe Doss wrote: >> Hello! >> >> One major pain point that Fedora Cloud currently faces is the fact that once >> a new Fedora release comes out, the cloud images are no longer updated over >> time. This brings a

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180613.0

On 06/13/2018 06:23 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180613.0 > Commit(x86_64): > c51100f14cf12b25c16562cede7455191e536c0534e3b2ef87e66be9e12899ae > Commit(aarch64): >

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180527.0

On 05/29/2018 03:06 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180527.0 > Commit(x86_64): > 291ea90da29bc5abe757b5a50813b3de1396b08412939a89b3b671aba9856093 > Commit(aarch64): >

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180515.1

On 05/16/2018 02:03 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180515.1 > Commit(x86_64): > a29367c58417c28e2bd8306c1f438b934df79eba13706e078fe8564d9e0eb32b > Commit(aarch64): >

Re: Kernel update breaks GCE VM (or: how to update kernel)

On 05/04/2018 02:28 PM, spike wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a Fedora 28 image running on GCP which is basically just the raw > disk image found in Fedora-Cloud-Base-28-1.1.x86_64.raw.xz. For the record, > here's how I instantiated the VM: > > xz --decompress

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180425.0

A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: Version: 28.20180425.0 Commit(x86_64): 94a9d06eef34aa6774c056356d3d2e024e57a0013b6f8048dbae392a84a137ca Commit(aarch64): 12a95314084eaa2242bdfe24197774aac163433d2405bc2813b4d89180434630 Commit(ppc64le):

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 27.122

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 04/19/2018 05:55 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 27.122 > Commit(x86_64): > 931ebb3941fc49af706ac5a90ad3b5a493be4ae35e85721dabbfd966b1ecbf99 >

Re: Cloud Base validation tests missing for Fedora 28 Beta

On 04/04/2018 01:43 PM, Joe Doss wrote: > I was signed in when I tried to fill out the wiki page. I just checked again > and it states You need to have at least CLA+1 (group). I just checked my > Fedora account and I am approved in the cla_done group. Is there another one > I need to apply

Stop creating PV AMIs in AWS

FYI: https://pagure.io/cloud-sig/issue/284 We are going to stop creating/releasing PV AMIs in AWS. We've never created them for Atomic Host and we'd like to stop creating them for cloud as it is another avenue for us to test. Dusty ___ cloud mailing

Re: Cloud Base validation tests missing for Fedora 28 Beta

On 03/30/2018 10:34 AM, Joe Doss wrote: > I spun up Fedora 28 Beta 1.3 Cloud AMI in us-west-2, ran through the tests > and it had no issues aside from selinux-policy needed to get updated to > selinux-policy-3.14.1-19.fc28 > (https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-234de0ee13) so

Re: Cloud Base validation tests missing for Fedora 28 Beta

On 03/29/2018 08:56 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 03/28/2018 09:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> Hi folks! I noticed that none of the Base validation tests for Cloud >> have been run for F28 Beta: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Ba

Re: Cloud Base validation tests missing for Fedora 28 Beta

On 03/28/2018 09:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! I noticed that none of the Base validation tests for Cloud > have been run for F28 Beta: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test > > It'd be great if we could get those filled out. We are also missing the >

[cloud-sig] Issue #284: Deprecate releasing PV AMIs

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` yes please stop releasing PV images. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/cloud-sig/issue/284 ___ cloud mailing list --

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup

On 03/26/2018 08:20 PM, Blu3 Dr33m wrote: > HOW DO I ACCESS THE MEETING SERIOUSLY > Unfortunately we haven't been meeting regularly. I'd like to revamp that and start having them again. Is there anything in particular you are interested in? Dusty ___

[cloud-sig] Issue #283: F28 Vagrant fails to set network correctly

The status of the issue: `F28 Vagrant fails to set network correctly` of project: `cloud-sig` has been updated to: Closed as fixed by dustymabe. https://pagure.io/cloud-sig/issue/283 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[cloud-sig] Issue #283: F28 Vagrant fails to set network correctly

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` ok this should now be fixed by: https://pagure.io/fedora-kickstarts/pull-request/366 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/cloud-sig/issue/283

[cloud-sig] Issue #283: F28 Vagrant fails to set network correctly

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Thanks for reporting. I'll look into this tomorrow. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/cloud-sig/issue/283 ___ cloud mailing list --

Re: [atomic-announce] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/13/2018 03:02 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 27.81 > Commit(x86_64): > b25bde0109441817f912ece57ca1fc39efc60e6cef4a7a23ad9de51b1f36b742 >

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/01/2018 06:51 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 27.72 > Commit(x86_64): > 39848372585a65dc63fb3052f997139b8b30d6b55ce378337db3664177489d28 >

Re: [atomic-announce] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/18/2018 02:17 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 27.61 > Commit(x86_64): > 772ab185b0752b0d6bc8b2096d08955660d80ed95579e13e136e6a54e3559ca9 >

Re: [atomic-announce] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/04/2018 02:14 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 27.47 > Commit(x86_64): > 397e907961adafaeff11b807ceade8da5783134072406fcdba627f1195e0db76 >

Re: [atomic-announce] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 12/12/2017 02:49 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 27.25 > Commit(x86_64): > a2b80278eea897eb1fec7d008b18ef74941ff5a54f86b447a2f4da0451c4291a > Commit(aarch64): >

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 11/30/2017 11:48 AM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 27.16 > Commit(x86_64): > 86727cdbc928b7f7dd0e32f62d3b973a8395d61e0ff751cfea7cc0bc5222142f > Commit(aarch64): >

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 11/14/2017 02:10 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 27.1 > Commit(x86_64): > d428d3ad8ecf44e53d138042bad56a10308883a0c5d64b9c51eff27fdc9da82c > Commit(aarch64): >

please help us test the f27 cloud images in RC1.2

You can grab the image download links and fill out the results here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_27_RC_1.2_Cloud Unfortunately only half the AMIs uploaded: Fedora-Cloud-Base-27-1.2.x86_64 EC2 (us-east-1) ami-acaa02d6 paravirtual gp2

Re: firewalld in atomic host

On 04/21/2017 10:16 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > NOTE: if you respond to this message please 'reply-all'. > > I'd like to discuss firewalld on atomic host. Recently I was trying to > figure out the best way to explain to other users how to set firewall rules > on atomic host. >

[fedora-atomic] PR #91: Base for f27

dustymabe merged a pull-request against the project: `fedora-atomic` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Base for f27 `` https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/91 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >