Re: Putting Networkd on cloud Atomic and base image for F24

On 14/12/15, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 01:53 +0530, Kushal Das wrote: > > > > > The thing is that it's almost impossible to say "if we just run all X > > > tests, we can guarantee everything is fine!" in real life, especially > > > at the level of something as complex as an

Re: Cloud Atomic ISO, missing items for baremetal usage

> > B. Finishing Atomic overlay support; making hardware enablement an overlay This could be highly useful for supporting things that need to be added for support of the base daemon set of an Atomic host, e.g. gluster clients and fuse for GlusterFS persistent storage support. But I think we'd

Fedora cloud image feedback

Hi all, > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Local_Test_Cloud Interesting tool. Hadn't seen it before. I've also been working on a similar feature for the Atomic image (although it should work just fine for the Base images as well if we want). Basically, it adds a new boot menu item labeled

Re: Proposal to rework the OSTree commit stream

https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6313 On Tue, Dec 15, 2015, at 01:48 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > See: > ___ > cloud mailing list > cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Proposal to rework the OSTree commit stream

See: ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora cloud image feedback

Hello, Today in another conversation[1], I received this feedback about Fedora cloud images. Not sure if there is bug open for this, if not, do I file one? [1] https://pjps.wordpress.com/2015/12/15/fad-singapore-2015/ +-- On Tue, 15 Dec 2015, Deepak C Shetty wrote --+ | ... | How about

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be downloaded at: https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found here:

proposal: add a small set of default labels to the docker base images

I'd like to propose that a small subset of LABEL values be added to the Dockerfile, to support the generic labels defined here -> https://github.com/projectatomic/ContainerApplicationGenericLabels I think adding name, version, release, architecture, build-date, vendor, url and summary would be a

Re: proposal: add a small set of default labels to the docker base images

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > I'd like to propose that a small subset of LABEL values be added to the > Dockerfile, to support the generic labels defined here -> > https://github.com/projectatomic/ContainerApplicationGenericLabels > > I think adding

Re: Cloud Atomic ISO, missing items for baremetal usage

Matthew, On 2015-12-16 01:08, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 03:11:04PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: Should I just file bugs like that for each one of these other missing components, and set them to block a tracker bug for things to include on the ISO? In my view a baremetal

Re: Cloud Atomic ISO, missing items for baremetal usage

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:52:43AM +1100, Philip Rhoades wrote: >> >A. Separate hardware/virt trees; have the installer ISO point at the >> > hardware one by default (but also have the option of virt) >> >B.

Re: Cloud Atomic ISO, missing items for baremetal usage

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:52:43AM +1100, Philip Rhoades wrote: > >A. Separate hardware/virt trees; have the installer ISO point at the > > hardware one by default (but also have the option of virt) > >B. Finishing Atomic overlay support; making hardware enablement an > >overlay > >C. Getting

Re: Fedora cloud image feedback

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:41:30AM +, P J P wrote: > > Today in another conversation[1], I received this feedback about > > Fedora cloud images. Not sure if there is bug open for this, > > if not, do I file

Re: Fedora cloud image feedback

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:36:51AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > for this. First, you can use Vagrant, and the provided Vagrant images. > > > They're basically made for this case. Or, second, you can use the > >

Re: Fedora cloud image feedback

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:36:51AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> > > for this. First, you can use Vagrant, and the provided

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 12/15/2015 05:20 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be > downloaded at: > > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html > > Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found here: >

Re: Fedora cloud image feedback

On Wednesday, 16 December 2015 10:03 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: >Why not provide a image that has root or non-root user with std. passwd ? >whats the problem with that ? Default root password could become a security risk. Rarely people change such settings. It'd depend on the implementation, but

Re: Fedora cloud image feedback

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:39 AM, P J P wrote: > On Wednesday, 16 December 2015 10:03 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > >Why not provide a image that has root or non-root user with std. passwd ? > >whats the problem with that ? > > > Default root password could become a security

Re: Fedora cloud image feedback

Hello Matthew, > On Tuesday, 15 December 2015 6:09 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Hey, thanks for passing on the feedback. We basically have two answers > for this. First, you can use Vagrant, and the provided Vagrant images. > They're basically made for this case. Or, second, you can use the >

Updated Invitation: Fedora Release Tools Demo (Live Broadcast) @ Tue Dec 15, 2015 12pm - 1pm (acar...@redhat.com)

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART:20151215T17Z DTEND:20151215T18Z DTSTAMP:20151215T132315Z ORGANIZER;CN=acar...@redhat.com:mailto:acar...@redhat.com UID:fc61nmb1eusr8h9pn975g61...@google.com

Re: Cloud Atomic ISO, missing items for baremetal usage

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 08:55:29PM +0100, Vincent Van der Kussen wrote: > I initially wanted to use Gluster because it kind of fits the use > case. But unfortunaly the Gluster packages were not available in the > Atomic image so I used NFS for now. Would it be possible to add the > needed packages

Re: Fedora cloud image feedback

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:41:30AM +, P J P wrote: > Today in another conversation[1], I received this feedback about > Fedora cloud images. Not sure if there is bug open for this, > if not, do I file one? Hey, thanks for passing on the feedback. We basically have two answers for this. First,

Re: Fedora cloud image feedback

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:41:30AM +, P J P wrote: >> Today in another conversation[1], I received this feedback about >> Fedora cloud images. Not sure if there is bug open for this, >> if not, do I file one? >

Re: Cloud Atomic ISO, missing items for baremetal usage

Hi Matthew, Thanks for replying. I also saw the hack with privileged containers too. I was not sure how "production ready" this was and if it would become somehow a general practice. Vincent On 2015-12-15 13:36, Matthew Miller wrote: On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 08:55:29PM +0100, Vincent Van

Re: Cloud Atomic ISO, missing items for baremetal usage

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 03:11:04PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > Should I just file bugs like that for each one of these other missing > components, and set them to block a tracker bug for things to include > on the ISO? In my view a baremetal installation is first a server, so > it should have

Re: Fedora cloud image feedback

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > Also since cloud image is the most downloaded one, how about > providing a .iso file with pre-loaded user/passwd, so that people > willing to use cloud-image in non-cloud env (local, virt-mgr etc) can use > the iso file

Re: Cloud Atomic ISO, missing items for baremetal usage

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015, 5:49 PM Chris Murphy wrote: It seems to me the easier thing to do is tolerate baking more stuff into the images and ISO. OK I just rewound this in my head, and said WTS out loud. There's one cloud atomic tree, right? So adding a bunch of hardware

Re: Putting Networkd on cloud Atomic and base image for F24

On 12/14/2015 08:00 PM, Itamar wrote: > +1 for systemd-networkd, RH should add it into rhel. That's not really our call. :-) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ signature.asc