Re: [Cooker] Re: kronolith or php-pear RPM in 9.2 Contribs missing php-pear Date module

2003-11-17 Thread Oden Eriksson
måndagen den 17 november 2003 17.47 skrev Guillaume Rousse:
 This is better to discuss here...

 Ainsi parlait Colin Guthrie :
  Guillaume Rousse wrote:
   So it seems to be a packaging problem with the pear package, right ? I
   just 
 had a look at the package, but i'm not php fluent enough to fix
   it, so i prefer to let its maintainer fix it.
 
  I guess it looks that way! There may have been a decision to stop
  including the Date code, perhaps PHP's own built in functions
  superceeded them at somepoint. I'll do a little digging and see if I can
  find out, otherwise, I'll talk to the maintainer and see what I can work
  out. Perhaps I'll redo the package myself and pass it on to him.

I admit I know nothing about pear. I have checked how PLD is doing it, and 
their list is about 180 php-pear-* packages. Is this the way to do it?

I know this is not the answer to your question, but I have to ask this 
question anyhow. I personally don't know how to fix the problems reported 
with the php-pear package. Maybe J-M Dault knows? Or some other PHP guru?

I'm just a silly packager anyhow...



Re: [Cooker] Re: kronolith or php-pear RPM in 9.2 Contribs missing php-pear Date module

2003-11-17 Thread Pascal Terjan
Oden Eriksson wrote:

I admit I know nothing about pear. I have checked how PLD is doing
it, and their list is about 180 php-pear-* packages. Is this the way
to do it?
I started a php script some time ago (last chrismas ?)to build a 
mandrake rpm from a pear package name (quite simple as a package is well 
described, with dependencies, test files, ...).

That would generate a lot of packages so they couldn't be tested 
manually, so the script would have to automaticallay run the test 
programs. This could be done quite easily as pear has a command 
run-tests to run the regression tests.

I didn't finish because not many people looked interested.

The point is to decide if this is usefull as pear already has commands
to install/update packages.



Re: [Cooker] Re: kronolith or php-pear RPM in 9.2 Contribs missing php-pear Date module

2003-11-17 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Pascal Terjan :
 The point is to decide if this is usefull as pear already has commands
 to install/update packages.
It is. We want a single packaging system, not one per language (perl, php, 
etc...).
-- 
Guillaume Rousse
You can go anywhere you want if you look serious and carry a clipboard
-- Murphy's Laws on Work n°4