On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 09:38:22 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Seems a bit odd to me too as the existing simd code seems to C code residing
>> in .cpp files for some reason.
>
> Yeah, that is also a good point. Why setting C++ flags in CFLAGS, and not
> just CXXFLAGS?
>
> Also @vamsi-parasa,
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 07:04:52 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Hi Magnus, the new x86-simd-sort 4.0 needs C++17 to compile. Will look into
>> the changes needed for this library to compile without the C++17 standard
>> and get back to you.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vamsi
>
> Seems a bit odd to me too as the
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 15:14:28 GMT, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> src/java.base/linux/native/libsimdsort/avx2-32bit-qsort.hpp line 3:
>>
>>> 1: /*
>>> 2: * Copyright (c) 2021, 2023, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
>>> 3: * Copyright (c) 2021 Serge Sans Paille. All rights reserved.
>>
>> Is
> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
> advantage of AVX2 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
>
> For serial sort on random data, this PR shows upto ~7.5x
