On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:31:05 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Given that subclasses could set these fields lazily (however remote the case
>> might be), do you think we should then not specify the
>> `NullPointerException` for the read methods on these 2 classes. In which
>> case I can exclude
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:14:06 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>>> These 2 classes, the `CheckedInputStream` and the `CheckedOutputStream` are
>>> slightly different from the rest of the classes in this changeset. This
>>> javadoc here is for the constructor of the `CheckedInputStream`. The
>>>
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 10:47:31 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> These 2 classes, the `CheckedInputStream` and the `CheckedOutputStream` are
>> slightly different from the rest of the classes in this changeset. This
>> javadoc here is for the constructor of the `CheckedInputStream`. The
>>
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 10:13:00 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> These 2 classes, the `CheckedInputStream` and the `CheckedOutputStream` are
> slightly different from the rest of the classes in this changeset. This
> javadoc here is for the constructor of the `CheckedInputStream`. The
> implementation
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 09:44:25 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> make usage consistent with other similar usages in the file
>
>
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 09:41:40 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> make usage consistent with other similar usages in the file
>
>
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 01:52:06 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this doc-only change which updates the javadoc
>> of several classes in `java.util.jar` and `java.util.zip` to specify their
>> behaviour when `null` arguments are passed to the constructor or methods of
>>
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 01:52:06 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this doc-only change which updates the javadoc
>> of several classes in `java.util.jar` and `java.util.zip` to specify their
>> behaviour when `null` arguments are passed to the constructor or methods of
>>
> Can I please get a review of this doc-only change which updates the javadoc
> of several classes in `java.util.jar` and `java.util.zip` to specify their
> behaviour when `null` arguments are passed to the constructor or methods of
> those classes?
>
> For these updated classes, I have
