On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:52:32 GMT, fabioromano1 wrote:
>> As you note, that would probably require two divisions. I don't know if the
>> JIT compiler can detect that the arguments are the same and emit just one
>> division instead.
>> I think your code is good enough for the purpose of
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:07:49 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> fabioromano1 has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Removed trailing whitespaces
>
> As you note, that would probably require two divisions. I don't know if the
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:07:49 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> fabioromano1 has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Removed trailing whitespaces
>
> As you note, that would probably require two divisions. I don't know if the
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 18:24:49 GMT, fabioromano1 wrote:
>> The method `MutableBigInteger.divWord(long, int)` can use the algorithm of
>> Hacker's Delight (2nd ed), section 9.3, the same used in
>> `Long.divideUnsigned(long, long)` and `Long.remainderUnsigned(long, long)`,
>> to get the
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:23:22 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
> AFAIK, IntrinsicCandidate methods are only relevant in JIT compiled code. A
> test that checks correctness might not reach the compilation stage, and
> execute only in the bytecode interpreter.
>
> But IMO using the result of
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 18:24:49 GMT, fabioromano1 wrote:
>> The method `MutableBigInteger.divWord(long, int)` can use the algorithm of
>> Hacker's Delight (2nd ed), section 9.3, the same used in
>> `Long.divideUnsigned(long, long)` and `Long.remainderUnsigned(long, long)`,
>> to get the
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:15:57 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> fabioromano1 has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Removed trailing whitespaces
>
> What about splitting the result of `divWord()` into its components `q` and
>
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 18:24:49 GMT, fabioromano1 wrote:
>> The method `MutableBigInteger.divWord(long, int)` can use the algorithm of
>> Hacker's Delight (2nd ed), section 9.3, the same used in
>> `Long.divideUnsigned(long, long)` and `Long.remainderUnsigned(long, long)`,
>> to get the
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:38:08 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> fabioromano1 has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Removed trailing whitespaces
>
> Sure. But the purpose of a test is not much to check the _current_ code but
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:38:08 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> fabioromano1 has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Removed trailing whitespaces
>
> Sure. But the purpose of a test is not much to check the _current_ code but
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 18:24:49 GMT, fabioromano1 wrote:
>> The method `MutableBigInteger.divWord(long, int)` can use the algorithm of
>> Hacker's Delight (2nd ed), section 9.3, the same used in
>> `Long.divideUnsigned(long, long)` and `Long.remainderUnsigned(long, long)`,
>> to get the
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:14:58 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> fabioromano1 has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Removed trailing whitespaces
>
> The test does not seem to check that the results are correct, but just
>
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 18:24:49 GMT, fabioromano1 wrote:
>> The method `MutableBigInteger.divWord(long, int)` can use the algorithm of
>> Hacker's Delight (2nd ed), section 9.3, the same used in
>> `Long.divideUnsigned(long, long)` and `Long.remainderUnsigned(long, long)`,
>> to get the
> The method `MutableBigInteger.divWord(long, int)` can use the algorithm of
> Hacker's Delight (2nd ed), section 9.3, the same used in
> `Long.divideUnsigned(long, long)` and `Long.remainderUnsigned(long, long)`,
> to get the computation faster.
fabioromano1 has updated the pull request
14 matches
Mail list logo
