Re: [coreboot] Power supply and X220

Hi Matt, Mail to al...@fripost.org and CC to coreboot@coreboot.org, please, otherwise Albin may not be able to receive our mails, as he seems not subscribed into the mailing list. Best regards, Persmule 在 2017年03月22日 13:07,

Re: [coreboot] Power supply and X220

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Felix Held wrote: > For a x220 the 3,3V regulator on the BBB likely doesn't supply enough > current, since the Thinkpads usually don't have a diode in the power supply > line of the SPI flash and so you power part of the board when

Re: [coreboot] Add me_cleaner to automated tests?

Here's the list of boards I've got for coreboot testing. https://www.coreboot.org/User:MartinRoth#Platforms_supported_by_coreboot My plan is to get as many of these as I can set up for automated testing. When new boards are added to the tree, I try to buy them if possible, but that's a lot of

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot wiki: what license is the content under?

On 22/03/2017, Sam Kuper wrote: > On 21/03/2017, Martin Roth wrote: >> Wouldn't selecting CC BY-SA 4.0 also prevent that, if they're licensed >> at CC BY-SA 3.0? > > No, it would not prevent *importing* it, as the CC BY-SA licenses are >

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot wiki: what license is the content under?

On 21/03/2017, Martin Roth wrote: > So from the start, I just want to say that I'm not arguing just to > argue - I want to make sure we pick the correct license here. Likewise, and thanks for clarifying :) I appreciate your questions and have done my best to answer them.

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot wiki: what license is the content under?

So from the start, I just want to say that I'm not arguing just to argue - I want to make sure we pick the correct license here. I'm not really opposed to BY-SA, but I'm not sure I see the benefit to saying that coreboot's documentation can only be shared under that particular version of that

Re: [coreboot] Power supply and X220

No problem, Albin. All the things I suggested are of course things I've done at various stages. ;) Those SOIC clips also need taking care of, and the unfortunate fact is, the more you attach and detach them, the more likely you are to bend one of the pins on the clip. So, if you're trying to

Re: [coreboot] KGPE-D16: Most severe hang failure sorted out + boot time measures

Hi Timothy, On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:32:46 -0500 Timothy Pearson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/12/2017 07:58 PM, Daniel Kulesz via coreboot wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > as reported, the KGPE-D16 was mostly unusable for me in

Re: [coreboot] Add me_cleaner to automated tests?

On 21/03/2017, Martin Roth wrote: > Most of our current automated testing is just build testing, although > we're working to expand that. The boot testing we DO have doesn't > currently include any boards with an ME - they're currently all boards > that don't require any

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot wiki: what license is the content under?

On 21/03/2017, Martin Roth wrote: > Hey Sam. You're absolutely right, and I appreciate you pointing this > out. We need to get this fixed. Actually, as part of coreboot > joining the Software Freedom Conservancy, our documentation NEEDS an > open license of one sort or

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot wiki: what license is the content under?

Hey Sam. You're absolutely right, and I appreciate you pointing this out. We need to get this fixed. Actually, as part of coreboot joining the Software Freedom Conservancy, our documentation NEEDS an open license of one sort or another. Is there a reason we shouldn't switch to CC BY 4.0? - Do

Re: [coreboot] Add me_cleaner to automated tests?

Most of our current automated testing is just build testing, although we're working to expand that. The boot testing we DO have doesn't currently include any boards with an ME - they're currently all boards that don't require any blobs. Martin On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Sam Kuper

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot wiki: what license is the content under?

On 17/03/2017, Sam Kuper wrote: > Also: sanity check. Does anyone else here besides me and Timothy feel > that making the wiki documentation available under a free culture > license would be a good idea? A few other wiki users agreed with us, which is great:

Re: [coreboot] Power supply and X220

Hi again, I have not used serial to control the BBB, but use SSH over usbnet. Besides, I did not connect the external power to pin 3, but the dedicated power plug seat (The black one with a "5V" sticker). Cheers, Persmule

[coreboot] Add me_cleaner to automated tests?

I am still very new to Coreboot. I understand that Coreboot has an automated test system, so that each push to the repo builds and tests the result automatically. I also see that me_cleaner is now part of the Coreboot repo, under coreboot/util/me_cleaner/ . Instead of relying on manual test

Re: [coreboot] Power supply and X220

Hi! You should only power your BBB with an external 5V power supplier, > and connect its usb peripheral port to your controlling computer. > I have never used any ATX power supplier for this, just the > configuration I just described is enough. For a x220 the 3,3V regulator on the BBB likely

Re: [coreboot] Power supply and X220

Dear Albin, As for Persmule, I've never had the need to use an ATX power supply, or anything beyond the external BBB power supply and the two 3.3v pins/holes on the BBB itself when flashing Chromebooks externally. If the chip isn't being recognised, the most likely culprits are: 1. That you

Re: [coreboot] KGPE-D16: Most severe hang failure sorted out + boot time measures

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/12/2017 07:58 PM, Daniel Kulesz via coreboot wrote: > Hi folks, > > as reported, the KGPE-D16 was mostly unusable for me in my 2x Opteron 6276 + > 128 GB RAM configuration as it simply did not boot reliably - even with > serial console

Re: [coreboot] Lenovo Thinkpad X201: Coreboot incompatible with me_cleaner

On 21/03/2017, Sam Kuper wrote: > I have been investigating booting my X201 on two axes: > > - Coreboot vs stock BIOS > > - Intel Management Engine left alone vs neutralised with me_cleaner. > > Of the four quadrants created by those two axes, only one quadrant > does not

[coreboot] Lenovo Thinkpad X201: Coreboot incompatible with me_cleaner

Dear all, I have been investigating booting my X201 on two axes: - Coreboot vs stock BIOS - Intel Management Engine left alone vs neutralised with me_cleaner. Of the four quadrants created by those two axes, only one quadrant does not work: Coreboot + neutralised ME: - Stock BIOS: boots fine.

Re: [coreboot] Power supply and X220

Dear Albin, You should only power your BBB with an external 5V power supplier, and connect its usb peripheral port to your controlling computer. I have never used any ATX power supplier for this, just the configuration I just described is enough. Best

Re: [coreboot] Some errors by compiling romstage (I am a newbie)

Thanks a lot. Our compiler didn't support these options. Our developers deal with this issue. I think I will move in this matter soon. Regards, Maxim. Original Message Subject: Re: [coreboot] Some errors by compiling romstage (I am a newbie) Local Time: 3 Марта 2017 г. 9:22