Well, this seems to be really going off topic. My only intention was
to ask what the required/recommended host(system) compiler was and
what documentation there was for that.
Branden Waldner wrote:
> Is there an expected minimal system gcc version and if so, is it
> documented? I couldn't find
Hi,
If I may express my thoughts on this...
> Yeah, I really don't understand your concern here.
Having an undocumented (or silently installed, therefore unexpected)
dependency is undesirable (especially for a firmware), no question
about that.
> You seem to imply that this may cause some kind
Hi Mike!
The PIRQ_MISC registers in the indirect I/O address space with 0xc00
being the index register aren't IRQ numbers; those configuration bits.
To get an idea, have a look at the interrupt routing register chapter of
for example AMD publication number 45482 [1]. Not sure if that's the
> One is what you describe - a generic utility supporting everything
> that gets installed into say /usr/local/bin for lots of different
> invocations to do lots of different things with lots of different
> coreboot images.
>
> Two is specifically what is required to complete the configured build.
Hello again,
Given that there's still some activity going on regarding deprecations
on the release notes, the release may be delayed one or two more days
to let things settle down, but no more. I look into having the release
done this week, but I'd also like to proceed without rushing as it's
my
Hi Nico, thank you very much for your kind help, it really helped to
advance! Please could you answer a small question:
While cleaning up some code I noticed there are Misc,Misc0,Misc1,Misc2
interrupts - with the following "magic" values respectively:
mainboard_picr_data:
[0x08] =
Patrick Georgi via coreboot wrote:
> > It's absurd to me that coreboot would require any routines out of any
> > submodule for a build which will not use those routines.
>
> coreboot doesn't, cbfstool does.
If that were the case things would already be a lot better!
Alas, coreboot
Am Di., 17. Nov. 2020 um 05:06 Uhr schrieb Peter Stuge :
> It's absurd to me that coreboot would require any routines out of any
> submodule for a build which will not use those routines.
coreboot doesn't, cbfstool does.
One purpose of Kconfig is to ensure that only what's neccessary gets
8 matches
Mail list logo
