>
>
> In round numbers, coreboot is at about 5k commits/year (last time I
> looked; maybe it's higher or lower now). Assuming each CL takes
> around ten builds, that's 50,000 builds, times 350 boards, which
> translates to "a lot." It keeps Martin's house warm, I suspect. That's
> not counting
Hi,
We occasionally get into discussions in code reviews when code uses a
GCC extension, and a reviewer asks that it be rewritten to be C
standard compliant instead. A recent example was on the use of `void
*` arithmetic in this patch
I think quark revival should come with a reasonable deadline. IOW, if
people are serious about keeping this platform, I think we ought to
see commitments as to when they report that it works. I'd suggest July
1. We've had a lot of commitments before, but everyone is busy, and
hopes can outrun
Sure. Send me a mailing address. Unites should have Europe-friendly
wall-wart/power supplies and cables, etc. in the box.
Vincent
From: Andy Pont
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2022 11:13 AM
To: Zimmer, Vincent ; Karl Semich <0xl...@gmail.com>;
lpleah...@gmail.com
Cc: Coreboot
Subject: Re:
Vincent wrote...
> I can provide some Galileo h/w for folks if there is interest in supporting.
Looking at the configs it looks like both a Gen 1 and Gen 2 Galileo boards are
the place to start?
If you have both and can get them shipped to the UK that would be great. I
suspect I have power
Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> Once again, nobody is talking about deleting the platform or make it unusable.
Moving a board to a branch includes deleting it on master.
Deleting on master harms the board in two ways:
* Board code loses visibility, which also harms the project as a whole.
(Less
6 matches
Mail list logo
