Re: [Debconf-team] bursaries questions for summit (URGENT)

2015-02-03 Thread David Bremner
Richard Hartmann richih.mailingl...@gmail.com writes: Nitpick: absolutely unable to attend implies not being able to pay for it at all; I feel an option like while I could in theory pay for this, the financial sacrifices can not be justified at the moment in between the two above. Or maybe

Re: [Debconf-team] bursaries questions for summit (URGENT)

2015-02-03 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:41 AM, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: - We your privacy, but we also want to reduce financial +value Richard ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org

Re: [Debconf-team] bursaries questions for summit (URGENT)

2015-02-03 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:04 AM, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: Indeed, that's exactly the intent. If one checks absolutely unable to attend, doesn't make the list of sponsored attendees, and still shows up, one should expect to have some explaining to do. Ah, a canary. Good thinking,

Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-03 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote: 1) name of the psuedopackage Presumably, that's summit.debconf.org in this case. Correct. 2) a short description of what the pseudopackage will be used for (suitable for inclusion in

Re: [Debconf-team] LWN coverage of DebConf15

2015-02-03 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Margarita Manterola dijo [Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:16:34PM +0100]: (...) Before we agree to this, though, we would like to know what the cost would be. The closest to Germany that the journalist is coming from, the cheaper it's going to be for us to sponsor them, so it'd make sense for them to

[Debconf-team] Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-03 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
Dear BTS admins, The DebConf Infrastructure team requests a new pseudo-package, summit.debconf.org, for use in tracking bugs, feature requests and so forth for DebConf's instance of the Summit conference management system. See the thread starting here:

Re: [Debconf-team] Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-03 Thread Richard Hartmann
Thanks! Richard Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity. ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team

Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-03 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote: 1) name of the psuedopackage Presumably, that's summit.debconf.org in this case. Correct. 2) a short description of what the pseudopackage will be used for (suitable

[Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-03 Thread Don Armstrong
Package: bugs.debian.org Severity: wishlist Control: tag -1 moreinfo Control: submitter -1 Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com Control: retitle -1 add summit.debconf.org psuedo-package On Tue, 03 Feb 2015, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: The DebConf Infrastructure team requests a new

Re: [Debconf-team] Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-03 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 06:28:37PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: Thanks! Richard Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity. So it is now a bug against bugs.debian.org with a request for more info. See Don's response below. I'll follow up in #776982. I think I can provide the requested info. But,

Re: [Debconf-team] LWN coverage of DebConf15

2015-02-03 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 02/02/15 21:16, Margarita Manterola wrote: All that said, someone will need to handle contacting them and asking this kind of questions. Tincho, are you going to keep being their contact or will someone else be? I had already asked about cost estimates when I sent the idea to the list. I