This bug report clearly shows debootstrap finishing and a *later* crash.
Unless someone can show something debootstrap did that caused the later
problem, it's not appropriate to reassign this bug to debootstrap.
Also, perl-modules is only priority standard, so debootstrap will not
even install
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 649190 pbuilder
Bug #649190 [debootstrap] pbuilder: create fails with a package with two
versions in a distribution
Bug reassigned from package 'debootstrap' to 'pbuilder'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
apt-setup_0.56_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apt-setup_0.56.dsc
apt-setup_0.56.tar.gz
apt-setup-udeb_0.56_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.56_all.udeb
apt-cdrom-setup_0.56_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Accepted:
apt-cdrom-setup_0.56_all.udeb
to main/a/apt-setup/apt-cdrom-setup_0.56_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.56_all.udeb
to main/a/apt-setup/apt-mirror-setup_0.56_all.udeb
apt-setup-udeb_0.56_all.udeb
to main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup-udeb_0.56_all.udeb
apt-setup_0.56.dsc
to
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:38:30 +
with message-id e1rrpo6-0004ty...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#633553: fixed in user-setup 1.40
has caused the Debian Bug report #633553,
regarding debian-i18n: typo in German installation instructions
to be marked as done.
This means
user-setup_1.40_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
user-setup_1.40.dsc
user-setup_1.40.tar.gz
user-setup-udeb_1.40_all.udeb
user-setup_1.40_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
partman-btrfs_7_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-btrfs_7.dsc
partman-btrfs_7.tar.gz
partman-btrfs_7_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
partman-btrfs_7.dsc
to main/p/partman-btrfs/partman-btrfs_7.dsc
partman-btrfs_7.tar.gz
to main/p/partman-btrfs/partman-btrfs_7.tar.gz
partman-btrfs_7_all.udeb
to main/p/partman-btrfs/partman-btrfs_7_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-btrfs_7.dsc - source
Accepted:
user-setup-udeb_1.40_all.udeb
to main/u/user-setup/user-setup-udeb_1.40_all.udeb
user-setup_1.40.dsc
to main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.40.dsc
user-setup_1.40.tar.gz
to main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.40.tar.gz
user-setup_1.40_all.deb
to main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.40_all.deb
grub-installer_1.69_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
grub-installer_1.69.dsc
grub-installer_1.69.tar.gz
grub-installer_1.69_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
grub-installer_1.69.dsc
to main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.69.dsc
grub-installer_1.69.tar.gz
to main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.69.tar.gz
grub-installer_1.69_amd64.udeb
to main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.69_amd64.udeb
Override entries for your package:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 23:14, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 13:26, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
...
So my proposal is to switch the udeb compression default in dpkg to xz
for wheezy, when the busybox and udpkg changes have landed. Then most
rootskel-gtk_1.23_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel-gtk_1.23.dsc
rootskel-gtk_1.23.tar.gz
rootskel-gtk_1.23_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Otavio,
am Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 04:55:12PM -0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 23:14, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 13:26, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
...
So my proposal is to switch the udeb compression default in
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 09:41, Robert Millan r...@debian.org wrote:
2011/11/2 Robert Millan r...@debian.org:
2011/10/31 Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net:
Oh, I didn't realized you only uploaded kfreebsd-kernel-di-amd64. I am
going to work on it soon.
If you update kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 01:33, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 12:49:17AM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
I'm not objecting to the fact that mini uses an older kernel; but
I object rather strongly to this being completely undocumented.
Which mini image? A URL
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:45, Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
can linux-kernel-di-* sources and related binary packages be removed
from unstable? Reading at [0] and [1], binaries should be provided by
linux-2.6 already.
[0]
Reject Reasons:
rootskel-gtk_1.23_amd64.changes file already known to dak
md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of rootskel-gtk_1.23.dsc.
rootskel-gtk_1.23_amd64.udeb: can not overwrite existing copy already in the
archive.
md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 17:21, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
Otavio,
am Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 04:55:12PM -0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 23:14, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br
wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 13:26, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.37
Severity: normal
Hello,
currently there are two versions of perl-modules in sid:
$ apt-cache policy perl-modules
perl-modules:
Installed: 5.12.4-6
Candidate: 5.12.4-6
Version table:
5.14.2-5 0
I object rather strongly to this being completely undocumented.
There's no release of installer yet, since squeeze, thus this still
points to the current installer. We plan to get one running soon.
I'm sorry if I wasn't clear enough. The problem is not that the mini
image is older, that's
Il 19/11/2011 20:15, Otavio Salvador ha scritto:
Yes, they can be removed.
Cool, I'll file RM bugs for the following packages, then:
* linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6
* linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6
* linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6
* linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6
* linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6
*
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 Nov 20 00:15 buildd@fano build_cdrom
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_cdrom.log
* FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 Nov 20 00:19
On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 17:32:49 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 17:21, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
We could start with -z0 of course, which would be
supported by dpkg-dev and hence a trivial patch of debhelper would do.
But it doesn't gain that much.
If you
24 matches
Mail list logo
