Bug#1070832: option to add an RFC822 apt source

Hi, On Fri, 10 May 2024, Simon Richter wrote: > it would be nice to allow specifying RFC822-style apt sources from local > files, both as a main mirror and as additional package sources. I don't know if you are aware of it but I believe that mmdebstrap does already support that.

Bug#1063878: di-utils: chroot-setup.sh creates ineffective diversions (DEP17)

On Wed, 14 Feb 2024, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > i.e. is the the file-loss triggered only by the bad path in the > dpkg-divert call or is it triggered by the upgrade of dpkg between > both dpkg-divert calls? > > I thought it was the latter... and that would explain why OpenQA is

Bug#1063878: di-utils: chroot-setup.sh creates ineffective diversions (DEP17)

(Adding Colin as one of the debian-installer-utils comaintainers) Hi, On Tue, 13 Feb 2024, Helmut Grohne wrote: > I also see that https://openqa.debian.net/ has recent successes. dpkg > migrated to trixie about two weeks ago. I would have expected that this > breaks an d-i. Do you have an

Re: Time to drop win32-loader ?

Hello, On Tue, 19 Jul 2022, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > I haven't checked (as I don't have access to Windows machines...), but I'm > quite confident that the Windows Bootloader fiddling is quite unlikely to > work > on modern (Secure Boot ?) machines. I think I had read some report that it

Re: lvm2-udeb: uninstallable, depends on non-udeb libsystemd0

Control: tags -1 + patch Control: user de...@kali.org Control: usertags -1 + kali-patch On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 05:50:20 +0200 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I suppose the journal bits could be patched out for the udeb build (right > now, configure ends up defining SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_SUPPORT to 1 there), but

Bug#985696: debian-installer: Speech synthesis and Intel SOF firmware

On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Arnaud Rebillout, le lun. 22 mars 2021 17:30:30 +0700, a ecrit: > > some recent Intel sound cards require a firmware to work. > > Ah. So these should be getting supported by the firmware-enabled image > of Debian: >

Bug#984846: netcfg: Default hostname hardcoded in netcfg-common

Hi, Le mardi 09 mars 2021, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > My first reaction was “we could make that configurable on a per-vendor > fashion” (e.g. via debian/rules) but reading you are already patching > debian/netcfg-common.templates, why aren't you patching the two harcoded > locations in the first

Re: pkgsel: ok for new upload to unstable?

Hi, On Tue, 28 Jan 2020, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hi Raphael, > > I would like to upload pkgsel to unstable soon. > > There are commits where you were involved: > > * Ensure tasksel is installed > * Add preseedable pkgsel/run_tasksel debconf template > > Any objections on me uploading

Re: Avoiding low-memory warning in preseed mode

On Tue, 01 Oct 2019, Fred Boiteux wrote: > console. I've digged on Internet, and tried following preseed paragraph, > without success : > > d-i lowmem/low note > > Does someone can tell me which sentence is supposed to be used in preseed > file to skip this manual validation ? Where did you put

Installer image for HP mv2120 fails to build with Linux 5.2

Hello, FYI in Kali we tried to build the installer images with Linux 5.2 but the build fails on armel due to the image for HP Media Vault mv2120 going over some limit: > # Set machine id 1693 (0x069d) > devio > ./tmp/orion5x_network-console/mv2120/kernel 'wl 0xe3a01c06,4' 'wl > 0xe381109d,4' >

Bug#782287: PR updated

Hi, On Wed, 05 Sep 2018, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > FYI - updated the salsa PR with a further simplification according to the > feedback of Scott Moser. I'm wondering if there's a way to tell d-i to also install openvm-tools-desktop if the user opts to install a graphical desktop afterwards...

Bug#929322: partman-auto: Should increase size of / in multi and home recipes

Package: partman-auto Version: 148 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: de...@kali.org Usertags: origin-kali The size of the root partition has not been reevaluated since 2014 but the size of typical installations has grown in the mean time. When you install a Debian system with many packages

Re: Permission to join

On Thu, 17 Jan 2019, Jonathan Carter wrote: > I would like to help maintain live-installer > (https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/live-installer) and fix some > issues that affect me (initially, make some things that hard hard-coded > configurable). > > Raphael and Christian, are you ok that

Re: tracker.d.o integration?

Hi, On Sat, 15 Dec 2018, Holger Wansing wrote: > would it make sense to add a d-i team to > tracker.debian.org/teams? Certainly. And it should be easy to setup since you can use debian-boot@l.d.o as maintainer email to automatically add all the relevant packages. > And let Salsa sent commit or

Bug#893713: debootstrap-udeb: containts too many scripts files (most of them are symlink but...)

Hello Hideki, On Sat, 25 Aug 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > So you saved a few kilobytes and made the life harder for others. > > IMO it was the wrong decision. > > It was my mistake, of course, but I DON'T WANT TO MAKE SOMEONE'S LIFE > ANY HARDER, IT IS NOT INTENDED. People who made wrong

Bug#893713: debootstrap-udeb: containts too many scripts files (most of them are symlink but...)

Hi, On Tue, 21 Aug 2018, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Right. Feel free to fix/revert this at your earliest convenience. Did this in 1b4bb92db9812db76c71ee8743f232d0d2d8f8b2. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn

Bug#893713: debootstrap-udeb: containts too many scripts files (most of them are symlink but...)

Hi, On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > It's not a problem, but we can improve it, IMO (so severity is low). So you tried to fix a non-problem... and while doing so you introduced a real problem. While cleaning up the list of scripts to keep, you decided to drop the scripts for all

Bug#875858: pkgsel: Offer to install/manage unattended-upgrades

Hi, On Wed, 27 Jun 2018, Justin B Rye wrote: > _Description: Updates management on this system: > Applying updates on a frequent basis is an important part of keeping the > system secure. > . > By default, security updates are not automatically installed, as security > advisories should be

Bug#875858: pkgsel: Offer to install/manage unattended-upgrades

Hi, On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > I think it makes sense to explain in a bit more detail why that may not > be a good idea: Ok. On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I think it really should get reviewed through the usual channel > (debian-l10n-english@ if memory serves,

Bug#875858: pkgsel: Offer to install/manage unattended-upgrades

Hello, On Mon, 28 May 2018, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > debian-boot@: the requested revert looks fine to me, bonus points if it > comes with a (short) summary of these reasons in changelog, so that they > can be emphasized in the release announcement. :) I reverted the change in git:

Re: Processed: Bug #551838 in debootstrap marked as pending

Control: tag -1 - pending Control: tag -1 + patch Please stop marking bugs as pending as long as they are not merged. The existence of a merge request is similar to the existence of a patch, it does not mean that the it has been applied to the git repository. I told you so twice now, please pay

Enabled tracker.debian.org integration and tag_pending webhook

Hello, I just enabled two things for all our repositories: - "Emails on push" integration with tracker.debian.org so that one can receive git commit notifications through the vcs keyword with usual package subscription on the package tracker - the "tagpending" webhook which marks bugs as

Bug#742672: allow debootstrap to take a bare codename as the script parameter

Control: tags -1 = patch On Sun, 27 May 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > control: tags -1 +pending Please don't mark the bug as pending when you submit a merge request. It means that the bug has a patch but not that the fix has been committed to git. BTW, I enabled a webhook that will do this

Bug#839046: [PATCH] Enable merged-/usr by default again now that dpkg-shlibdeps is fixed (Closes: #839046)

Hi, On Sun, 27 May 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2018 16:21:01 +0200 > Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> wrote: > > I don't understand your question. The required fixes are in the version of > > dpkg that is in stretch. > > I mean, if we tr

Bug#839046: [PATCH] Enable merged-/usr by default again now that dpkg-shlibdeps is fixed (Closes: #839046)

On Sat, 19 May 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2018 11:37:32 +0200 > Laurent Bigonville wrote: > > + * Enable merged-/usr by default again now that dpkg-shlibdeps is fixed > > Is it applied to from buster to sid? > It maybe break the enviroment until stretch

Re: debootstrap: [idea] force review before commit to master

Hi, On Wed, 16 May 2018, Philipp Kern wrote: > I think what would be useful is coming up with a bunch of test cases and > adding them to Gitlab's CI feature. We have a few tests (probably need to be expanded) in debian/tests/ and they should be hooked with Gitlab CI, yes. > Personally I think

Bug#690210: debootstrap : debian-ports support

Hi, On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, jhcha54008 wrote: > I am afraid debootstrap already depends on perl (it > doesn't show up in the control file as perl-base > is Essential) : it ships a perl function 'pkg_details' > inline (see file /usr/share/debootstrap/functions line 1323 > in debootstrap version

Bug#840372: debootstrap: second-stage fails within systemd-nspawn: proc already mounted

On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 15:59:31 +0200 > Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> wrote: > > I'm saying this because the following lines are left untouched and are > > called in all cases: > >

Bug#896071: debootstrap fails to retrive Release file over https

On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 22 Apr 2018 09:40:54 +1000 > David Margerison wrote: > > > "$@" is extracted as '' and wget tries to fetch it and fails, > > > then returns 1. > > > > Regarding the proposed fix, in general using $@

Bug#896071: debootstrap fails to retrive Release file over https

Hi, On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > I'll revert below your commit since this regression fix also solve it. > > > commit c1c20ed48e83fe9d4f3512c524f7734d4e1469ac > > Author: Raphaël Hertzog > > Date: Thu Apr 12 12:18:29 2018 +0200 > > > > Do not use HTTPS

Bug#840372: debootstrap: second-stage fails within systemd-nspawn: proc already mounted

On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 10:06:49 +0200 > Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> wrote: > > Your patch will try to umount /proc even if it has not been mounted by > > debootstrap. That's wrong. If you detect that /proc was handled ou

Bug#690210: Bug 690210 : debootstrap : debian-ports support

On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > control: tags -1 +pending It's not "pending" because it's not yet pushed to the official git repository. I don't know if you just forgot to push or if willingly kept it out for now... But please can you avoid committing intrusive changes before seeking

Bug#840372: debootstrap: second-stage fails within systemd-nspawn: proc already mounted

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > So it looks like systemd-nspawn already took care of mounting /proc and > > debootstrap fails when trying to do the same? Maybe debootstrap could > > just skip mounting /proc if this mount is already present? > > Here's a proposed patch. Your patch

Bug#741964: debootstrap: --variant=fakechroot and --foreign

Hello Hideki, it seems to me that you should test and review your commits more often. On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > - if doing_variant fakechroot; then > - setup_proc_fakechroot > - else > + if doing_variant ! fakechroot; then This is not doing what

Re: debootstrap and using /var/cache/apt/archives as --cache-dir

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > For all those reasons, I'm really sure that it is not a good idea > > to enable that directory as default --cache-dir. > > Thanks, 1 is rare, but 2 and 3 sound reasonable. > Then, can we make any directories for cache option by default? You could

debootstrap and using /var/cache/apt/archives as --cache-dir

Hi, moving to debian-boot as this is unrelated to this bug. On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > Drop default value for --cache-dir parameter > > > > It is not at all appropriate for debootstrap to start putting files > > in APT's cache of .deb files (it could possibly

Bug#895466: debootstrap 1.0.96 fails due to missing apt-config

Hi, On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > While running debootstrap on a non-native debian system, debootstrap keeps > failing with > > debootstrap: line 55: apt-config: command not found Duh... this change has even been discussed on the mailing list. I think it's partly fixed already

Re: debootstrap 1.0.93+nmu5

On Tue, 03 Apr 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > +if [ -e /usr/bin/apt-config ]; then In case like this, you usually use "-x" to ensure it's also executable. > +eval $(apt-config shell AUTOPROXY Acquire::http::ProxyAutoDetect) > +if [ -z "$http_proxy" ] && [ -x "$AUTOPROXY" ]; then > +

Re: debootstrap 1.0.93+nmu5

On Fri, 30 Mar 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 14:24:27 +0200 > Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> wrote: > > debootstrap can be run on a non-Debian system and should not assume that > > apt-config is available. I would suggest to protect th

Re: debootstrap 1.0.93+nmu5

Hi, On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > From: Michael Vogt > Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 15:36:58 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH 09/13] try to auto-detect proxy if available > > --- a/debootstrap > +++ b/debootstrap > @@ -49,6 +49,17 @@ PRIVATEKEY="" >

Bug#866401: Please print proper error message when download fails

Hi, On Wed, 21 Mar 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 18:15:06 +0900 Hideki Yamane > wrote: > > Then, how about to change it to "-nv" (no-verbose) option? > > Here's a proposed patch. busybox's wget does not fail with this option but it also does not

Bug#861343: debootstrap: hardcodes mawk as awk provider

Hi Hideki, On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > However, in scripts/*, there's unnecessary mawk hardcode line and > we can remove it safely as attached patch. [...] > - ln -sf mawk "$TARGET/usr/bin/awk" > + ln -sf awk "$TARGET/usr/bin/awk" Huh? This doesn't make any sense. You

Bug#798564: debootstrap: Add scripts for kali releases

Hi, On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 21:15:47 +0100 Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> wrote: > > We only need kali-rolling, kali-dev and kali-last-snapshot. > > Okay, I'll update it after NMU. > And, is default_mirror better to use ht

Re: Clean up bug report for debootstrap

Hello Hideki, On Sun, 25 Feb 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > What can I do for it? Who should I talk to for review? Why not applying the patches yourself and becoming the maintainer of debootstrap for a while? I think it doesn't have any obvious regular maintainer and it could benefit from a bit

Bug#798564: debootstrap: Add scripts for kali releases

On Sat, 24 Feb 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:45:20 +0200 =?utf-8?q?Rapha=C3=ABl_Hertzog?= > wrote: > > I'd like debootstrap to have native support of the various kali releases. > > Patch attached, based on Bug#798562. Thanks, but in the mean time our

Bug#798562: debootstrap: Support "scripts" sharing code with Debian but with different default_mirror and keyring

Hi, On Sat, 24 Feb 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:22:25 +0200 =?utf-8?q?Rapha=C3=ABl_Hertzog?= > wrote: > > It might be possible to just move the code out in some separate > > files that can be sourced from all the "script" files? > > I've made a PoC

Bug#839046: debootstrap: enable --merged-usr by default

On Tue, 13 Feb 2018, Julien Cristau wrote: > On 02/13/2018 04:29 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > I believe that we have had quite some testing already last time and I > > would be surprised if we got many more RC bugs on dpkg that had to be fixed > > on a short timeframe. I

Bug#839046: debootstrap: enable --merged-usr by default

On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Guillem Jover writes: > > In any case, I looked the other day into implementing the > > --map-pathname option for dpkg-query, and I've got most of the code > > ready. The problem is that this requires adding support for config > > files and config

Re: busybox sh broken on i386 with glibc 2.26, leads to kernel panic

Hello, On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > busybox is compiled with -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 on i386 which has > the same effect of reducing the default stack alignment from 16 bytes to > 2 bytes. This comes from arch/i386/Makefile: > > | # -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 is essential

busybox sh broken on i386 with glibc 2.26, leads to kernel panic

Control: reassign -1 src:glibc 2.26-1 Control: retitle -1 busybox sh broken on i386 with glibc 2.26, leads to kernel panic Control: severity -1 serious Control: affects -1 + busybox src:linux Hello, on i386 with glibc 2.26-4, busybox sh is broken: $ busybox sh [...] BusyBox v1.27.2

Bug#875858: pkgsel: Offer to install/manage unattended-upgrades

On Tue, 02 Jan 2018, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Even more reason not to enable it if desktops are already catered for. There's more than GNOME in Debian. > > Right, there are cases where a service restart is required. There are also > > many cases where it's not at all required because the

Bug#875858: pkgsel: Offer to install/manage unattended-upgrades

Hi, On Sun, 17 Dec 2017, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > unattended-upgrades are not an appropriate default. It's okay for a desktop > system which gets powered down daily, so you can add it to tasksel lists for > desktop roles, but not enable it by default for servers. I think it's not really useful

Re: Epochs in git tags

Hi, On Fri, 08 Dec 2017, Christian PERRIER wrote: > It seems that debcommit changed its way to tags releases with an > epoch: up to recently, the epoch was just dropped, but now it is used, > but ":" is replaced by "%" > > That indeed explains why I "suddenly" changed my tagging method > without

Bug#875858: pkgsel: Offer to install/manage unattended-upgrades

Hello, On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Raymond Burkholder wrote: > I think I got thrown off by the title 'unattended upgrades'. If this is > limited to security updates, I am more for it, but still scared of it. Maybe you should document yourself before commenting and sharing such a strongly worded

Bug#883711: pkgsel: should running updatedb really be the default?

On Wed, 06 Dec 2017, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > This commit looks like something that should be been discussed, rather than > something I get to discover while preparing the release announcement: Most of the time when I hear from you, it's for a complaint. You might not realize, but your mails are

Re: Replace discover by isenkram in d-i, better integration with virtualizations/clouds

Hi, On Mon, 04 Dec 2017, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 12/03/2017 05:30 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > In the last years, Petter Rheinholdtsen worked on isenkram[2] with a > > similar but a bit broader goal. I noticed it has better support > > of clouds and that it will instal

Re: Replace discover by isenkram in d-i, better integration with virtualizations/clouds

Hi, On Sun, 03 Dec 2017, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > I see mainly benefits to such a move. The only downside is that it > > would pull python by default. This entirely depends on whether we want > > to keep it installed or not. We could install it just to do a single > > scan and install pass

Replace discover by isenkram in d-i, better integration with virtualizations/clouds

[ Please respect reply-to, let's have this discussion on debian-boot ] Hello everybody, debian-installer is using discover[1] to install some packages based on the hardware it discovers. Unfortunately, discover is dead upstream (Debian is the upstream really) and the hardware->package database

Bug#868900: iso-scan: should be able to copy the ISO into RAM before mount

Hi, On Wed, 29 Nov 2017, Miguel Figueiredo wrote: > > Let me know if there's anything to improve before it's ready to be merged > > (notably on the debconf template, etc.). > > [...] > > Installation guide update ? Done: https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/d-i?view=revision=70938 Cheers, --

Re: Permission to commit and upload?

Hi, On Sun, 29 Oct 2017, Colin Watson wrote: > > Colin, could you review the patches I sent in the above bug reports and > > let me know if you think they are suitable to be committed ? You made > > similar changes to mine in debian-installer-utils and you have a broad > > knowledge of

Bug#868900: iso-scan: should be able to copy the ISO into RAM before mount

Control: tag -1 + pending On Sun, 29 Oct 2017, Colin Watson wrote: > diff --git a/debian/iso-scan.postinst b/debian/iso-scan.postinst > index e34f329..1109ba5 100755 > --- a/debian/iso-scan.postinst > +++ b/debian/iso-scan.postinst [...] > The directory-changing here is messy, and left me

Bug#868859: iso-scan: should also scan LVM logical volumes

Control: tag -1 + pending On Sun, 29 Oct 2017, Colin Watson wrote: > > Obviously this has implications on the rest of the installation process. > > The logical volume will be in use and the partitioning step will have > > to preserve the logical volume and its parent volume group. > > > >

Re: Busybox 1.27 breaks kernel cmdline preseeding

On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Philip Hands wrote: > I'm not sure its important, but when testing a similar script I came up > with something that seems to give better results on the (perhaps > demented) test case I was playing with. Here's mine: > > 's/\([^= ]\+\|\([^=

Re: Busybox 1.27 breaks kernel cmdline preseeding

Hi, On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> wrote: > [...] > > I pushed a pu/kernel-cmdline-preseed branch implementing the preseeding > > out of /proc/cmdline. It's more elaborate than Ma

Bug#868848: debian-installer-utils: "list-devices partition" should report LVM logical volumes too

Control: tag -1 + pending Hi, On Sun, 29 Oct 2017, Colin Watson wrote: > I think this is basically a reasonable thing to do, but it seems to me > that it's going to cause rescue-mode to list LVs twice (see the > choose_root function). Could you fix that? A sensible approach would > probably be

Re: Busybox 1.27 breaks kernel cmdline preseeding

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Apparently, kfreebsd has a working /proc/cmdline (thanks to linprocfs mounted > by default) so we might want to switch to that. I pushed a pu/kernel-cmdline-preseed branch implementing the preseeding out of /proc/cmdline. It's more elaborat

Re: Busybox 1.27 breaks kernel cmdline preseeding

Hello, On Fri, 24 Nov 2017, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Now, how should we go about fixing this? Adam pointed out we could always > > just parse /proc/cmdline, but this does not just work on kfreebsd. It's > > also possible to consider both /proc/cmdline and the environment; or just > > revert the

Bug#868852: debian-installer: hd-media images should have LVM support to find ISO in logical volumes

Hi, On Thu, 23 Nov 2017, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > You mentioned on IRC you were looking into several patches/packages. > I'll probably release d-i over the next few days, so I'm not sure I'll > pick all updates for the next alpha. I'll likely only pick what's > needed, and we'll finish merging

Bug#868852: debian-installer: hd-media images should have LVM support to find ISO in logical volumes

Hi Cyril, On Thu, 23 Nov 2017, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > So this seems to have just been committed. Can you expand on the arch > selection? It seems strange. It's basically the release architectures that have an hd-media configuration file. Do you want me to do the same change to non-release

Re: Towards Debian Buster Alpha 2

On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Christian PERRIER wrote: > I'll also build/upload pkgsel with Raphael's changes Hum, I uploaded 0.46 after having committed my changes (and it's in testing already apparently). Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS:

Re: Permission to commit and upload?

[ Colin, there's a review request for you in there ] Hello Cyril, On Thu, 12 Oct 2017, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> (2017-10-09): > > (feel free to cc me so that I see your answer sooner) > > > > Hello everybody, > > > >

Permission to commit and upload?

(feel free to cc me so that I see your answer sooner) Hello everybody, I have a few pending patches that I'd like to commit and upload... but since I'm only an occasional d-i contributor, I would like to double check that nobody has any objection. My current list is: - #868848:

Bug#852323: debian-installer: grub-installer not convert root= entry to UUID

On Mon, 09 Oct 2017, Michael Stone wrote: > > I'd still expect the installer to DTRT with UUIDs in that case, though. > > I'm more thinking of a non-standard bootup / custom kernel or similar... > > Maybe I'm missing something here? Fire up a current debian netinst 9.2 iso > in a kvm session (no

Bug#875858: pkgsel: Offer to install/manage unattended-upgrades

Control: tag -1 + patch On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >For Debian, I don't think that making such a difference makes sense. > >We should: > >- either always show the question with its default value of "none" > > (thus making sure that they have a chance to opt-in to this feature)

Re: Bug#872598: udev-udeb: no input in graphical installer

Hi, On Thu, 24 Aug 2017, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > The attached patch seems to do the trick, will upload after a full build > > inside sbuild, then open a bug report as you suggested on IRC, so that > > you think about reverting this when the gcc-7 bug is fixed. > > I initially meant to add g++

Bug#868900: iso-scan: should be able to copy the ISO into RAM before mount

Source: iso-scan Version: 1.57 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch When you use an ISO image stored on a disk, it makes it impossible to re-use that disk in the installation process (e.g. for automatic partitioning). In order to avoid this limitation, I would like iso-scan to be able to copy the ISO

Bug#868859: iso-scan: should also scan LVM logical volumes

Source: iso-scan Version: 1.57 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: de...@kali.org Usertags: origin-kali kali-patch Control: block -1 by 868848 868852 With this patch, I ensure that we activate LVM logical volumes so that they are visible by "list-devices" and so that they can be scanned too. That

Bug#868852: debian-installer: hd-media images should have LVM support to find ISO in logical volumes

Source: debian-installer Version: 20170615 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: de...@kali.org Usertags: origin-kali kali-patch I would like the hd-media images to include the "md-modules" and "lvm2-udeb" udebs so that we can find the ISO image on LVM logical volumes too. The attached patch

Bug#868848: debian-installer-utils: "list-devices partition" should report LVM logical volumes too

Source: debian-installer-utils Version: 1.119 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: de...@kali.org Usertags: origin-kali kali-patch Just like "list-devices partition" reports back RAID partitions, it should also report LVM logical volumes. The attached patch does this. My goal is to extend the

Bug#841072: installation-report: failure to mount the EFI partition: IO charset ascii not found

Package: installation-reports Version: 2.62 Severity: important -- Package-specific info: Boot method: USB key Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso build of 2016-10-03 Date: 2016-10-17 Machine: Lenovo Thinkpad X260 Base

Bug#795537: Duplicate of 796096

Control: reassign -1 src:linux Control: forcemerge 796096 -1 The detailed explanations are in #796096. -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/

Bug#805291: preseed: Offer a way to override initrd-level preseeding with kernel command line preseeding

Hi Philip, On Sun, 10 Jan 2016, Philip Hands wrote: > BTW would you happen to know if the example for checksums on CDs is > relevant any more? > > - if you're booting a remastered CD: > preseed/file=/cdrom/preseed.cfg > preseed/file/checksum=5da499872becccfeda2c4872f9171c3d > > which

Bug#805291: preseed: Offer a way to override initrd-level preseeding with kernel command line preseeding

Hi, On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Philip Hands wrote: > > It seems like it ought to be mostly harmless, and probably ought to have > > been like that all along (it certainly makes sense to me to have the > > harder-to-set preseeds over

Bug#647405: please allow pre-seeding for deb-src line

Control: tag -1 + patch Hello, On Wed, 02 Nov 2011, Marc Haber wrote: > Please consider allowing this, for example by a pre-seeding option > d-i mirror/http/source boolean I'm working on this feature as I would like to use it in Kali. I choose to name the option

Bug#805291: preseed: Offer a way to override initrd-level preseeding with kernel command line preseeding

On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Philip Hands wrote: > It seems like it ought to be mostly harmless, and probably ought to have > been like that all along (it certainly makes sense to me to have the > harder-to-set preseeds over-ridden by the easier-to-set ones). > > You should probably give it a try and see

Bug#647405: please allow pre-seeding for deb-src line

On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Christian PERRIER wrote: > As the question is not asked during default installs (use of "low" > prio for debconf), I'd suggest using sublevel 3 for the newly > introduced templates --> s/:sl2:/:sl3: OK, fixed locally, as well as a small typo (bandwith -> bandwidth). Cheers,

Bug#652987: the cdrom path is not disabled in sources.list

Control: tag -1 pending On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, prathib...@cdac.in wrote: > While installing debian using the live-installer package, the cdrom path > in the sources.list exists after the completion of the installation in > sources.list. While reloading the synaptic package manager, it shows the >

Bug#702257: apt-setup: new preseed option to disable CDROM entries at the end of the install

Control: tag -1 + pending On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, Federico Bruni wrote: > Can you please advise about the status of this bug? I have just committed the patch to git. It should be in the next release (0.102). Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS:

Bug#764030: d-i.debian.org: update url from packages.qa.debian.org to tracker.debian.org in scripts

Hi, On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Cyril Brulebois wrote: A single occurrence of packages.qa.debian.org remains, but that's a mail address. I'm not sure there's a corresponding one on the tracker side: debian-installer_...@packages.qa.debian.org I've added Raphaël to Cc to query his opinion.

Bug#785069: jessie live-installer can't install grub when booted via usb drive without internet

On Fri, 29 May 2015, Pirate Praveen wrote: On Friday 29 May 2015 02:46 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: It might be useful to provide a log so that we understand what's happening here. Just tested with Graphical Install from boot menu and grub install is working. So we can mention it as a work

Bug#774811: debian-installer: debian-testing-powerpc-netinst.iso 2015-01-05 08:58 278M doesn't boot

Hi, Since this problem is powerpc specific, I'm putting debian-powe...@lists.debian.org in copy and since it concerns the bootability of an ISO image, I also add debian...@lists.debian.org. On Wed, 07 Jan 2015, intervenant0 wrote: I have downloaded debian-testing-powerpc-netinst.iso 2015-01-05

Re: Bug#740998: rdnssd: merge-hook overwrites /etc/resolv.conf when /sbin/resolvconf is not installed

Control: clone -1 -2 Control: retitle -1 NetworkManager and rdnssd do not play well together Control: retitle -2 rdnssd drops non-nameserver settings from /etc/resolv.conf when overwriting it Control: severity -2 important [ Ccing debian-boot, and in particular Colin Watson and Philipp Kern

Re: Debian installer and CD BoF: my views for jessie

Hi, On Tue, 26 Aug 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote: I might be misremembering of course but I think d-i on linux archs has been working more or less during the whole release cycle. (The parted I can confirm this as I imported d-i snapshots from git into Kali to cope with new upstream kernels that

Bug#656710: partman-crypto: Preseeding the passphrase

Hi, On Sat, 21 Jan 2012, Christian PERRIER wrote: Thanks for your proposal and the care you took in building a proper patch. We generally leave it up to Colin Watson to decide what Ubuntu change is well suited for being included in Debian, when it comes at D-I. So let's get his input about

Bug#719101: netcfg: provide a clean way to change default hostname (for derivatives)

On Thu, 08 Aug 2013, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Unfortunately this has bad side-effects such as the impossibility to actually automate a PXE install because the seen flag is always reset to false (even if we pass hostname=kali on the kernel command line). Use hostname?=kali on the kernel

Bug#705599: finish-install: 07speakup needs to be updated for Wheezy and GNOME 3

Hi, On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Samuel Thibault wrote: Raphael Hertzog, le Thu 18 Apr 2013 08:27:01 +0200, a écrit : 1/ you're setting up dbus within d-i instead of letting it happen during the first boot like on other installation scenarios ? I don't undesrstand this: it only sets up

Bug#705599: finish-install: 07speakup needs to be updated for Wheezy and GNOME 3

On Thu, 18 Apr 2013, Samuel Thibault wrote: So in the end, it would rather be the attached patch, which also enables the screen reader. Honestly, I prefer my patch over yours: 1/ you're setting up dbus within d-i instead of letting it happen during the first boot like on other installation

Re: Bug#699808: tech-ctte: syslinux vs the wheezy release

Hi, On Wed, 06 Feb 2013, Bdale Garbee wrote: two at a time. Holding d-i's build dependencies static in unstable for more than half a year is just nuts to me! Sure seems like d-i is something we should build using the components of the release it will be contained in and not unstable... but

Re: Bug#699808: tech-ctte: syslinux vs the wheezy release

On Thu, 07 Feb 2013, Raphael Hertzog wrote: on the mirror and not in the package repository (the installer directories are shared between wheezy and sid). Cyril pointed out to me that this specific point is wrong, while wheezy/main/installer-* and unstable/main/installer-* have the same content

live-installer important bugfix for Italian support

(Keep me on CC, I'm not on debian-boot) Hello, I just debugged an issue where live-installer would not work when you opted for an Italian installation. The commit below has my explanation of the problem and a tested fix. That said I'm not very familiar with the internals of main-menu and this

  1   2   3   >