* Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl [2009-05-25 23:05]:
I disagree. The function of hw-detect, and in this case more
particular disk-detect, is to ensure any hardware needed for
partitioning gets made available. IMO this fits that definition
perfectly.
How about I simply include the udeb in the
The mmc-modules udeb should be downloaded automatically because
installations to an SD card will be quite popular on one device.
This is not done at the moment because the module is priority extra.
I assume the correct way to proceed is to change the priority of this
udeb to standard in
* Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br [2009-05-25 17:20]:
I'd say that you could make a module depends on it; so it will be
uploaded from network or from the media (as done for other modules
already).
Well, I don't really see which other module should depend on it. What
did you have in
On Monday 25 May 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
The mmc-modules udeb should be downloaded automatically because
installations to an SD card will be quite popular on one device.
This is not done at the moment because the module is priority extra.
I assume the correct way to proceed is to change
Hello Martin,
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com wrote:
The mmc-modules udeb should be downloaded automatically because
installations to an SD card will be quite popular on one device.
This is not done at the moment because the module is priority extra.
I
* Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl [2009-05-25 22:30]:
Do they accept different priority for the same udeb for different arches?
The udeb name contains the name of the subarch, so it would be unique.
IMO the better solution is to load it using anna-install, either
during hw-detect or early in
Hello,
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com wrote:
* Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl [2009-05-25 22:30]:
Do they accept different priority for the same udeb for different arches?
The udeb name contains the name of the subarch, so it would be unique.
IMO the better
On Monday 25 May 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl [2009-05-25 22:30]:
Do they accept different priority for the same udeb for different
arches?
The udeb name contains the name of the subarch, so it would be unique.
Right. I still don't like it much.
IMO the
8 matches
Mail list logo
