On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:59:13PM +1000, David Tulloh [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
I just wanted to stick my hand up for a 'me too' on this bug.
The bug occurred when I upgraded apt and friends to testing (apt
0.7.14+b1). dpkg was an old testing version, I'm afraid I don't have
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:31:48AM +0200, Rune Kock [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
How did you print the list of all manually installed packages? What
was the command you used?
I use the command
aptitude search ?and(?installed , ?not(?automatic))
(probably more awkward than it
I can't reproduce this, but if I copy your APT::Cache-Limit setting, I
get a bunch of warnings from aptitude saying that it couldn't load the
cache because it ran out of room in DynamicMmap. And I notice that this
is the one common thread -- all three people who reported this have
modified the
Thanks for bringing this bug to my attention; it was fixed in version
0.4.7, but apparently never got closed.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:28:01AM +0200, Rune Kock [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
stavanger:/home/rune# aptitude markauto knewsticker kopete kppp krdc
krfb kscd kscreensaver
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 03:41:54PM +0200, Rune Kock [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:28:01AM +0200, Rune Kock [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
stavanger:/home/rune# aptitude markauto knewsticker kopete kppp krdc
krfb kscd kscreensaver kscreensaver-xsavers
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 05:34:30AM -0700, Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
I recently installed the latest msttcorefonts, which is now a dummy
package for the new name ttf-msttcorefonts-installer. I had previously
installed msttcorefonts manually.
Since msttcorefonts is now a
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 03:43:10AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
[snip]
dpkg: latex-ucs: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you request:
latex-ucs-contrib depends on latex-ucs.
Removing latex-ucs ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/latex-ucs.postrm: line 12:
=[127.0.1.1])
by algebraicthunk.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 1KGDh9-0007WX-9q; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 06:57:27 -0700
From: Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 04:17:48PM +0200, Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On 2008-07-08 16:14 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Package: tetex-ucs
Severity: serious
When I reassigned a bug report to tetex-ucs, I got the attached
bounce. The Maintainer address
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 03:50:18PM +0100, Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:30:09AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Interesting question, though: I checked packages.debian.org and this
*does* have a real maintainer (Martin Pitt). So maybe
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:03:13PM +0200, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Quoting Jens Seidel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I don't see any problem with applying these patches now. They will not
change anything (execpt the statistics but these are currently just
wrong as
It looks to me like the problem is that aptitude figures out which
packages are unused before it applies unmarkauto. You can see the
same effect if you select an unused package in the curses UI and set it
to manual mode -- the auto flag gets cleared but the package will still
be removed. As a
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:09:18AM +0300, Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Not really. See #201842 and #479620. Unfortunately Daniel Burrows still
didn't comment on them. Maybe he will show up here?
The main reason I haven't touched those bugs is that there are many
more
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 12:31:03AM -0400, Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
Package: apt
Version: 0.7.12
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/apt-cache
Hi,
I got the following error when trying to search for all the debug
packages:
$ apt-cache search \*-dbg
E: Regex
Package: nut-nutrition
Version: 13.9-1
Severity: minor
The package description of 'nut' contains a hard-wrapped line. This
prevents package managers from flowing it with the rest of the paragraph
to fit the available display space; for instance, on a
thinner-than-usual terminal, aptitude is
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 09:56:12AM +0200, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Quoting Miguel Figueiredo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Here it goes the updated translation of aptitude.
Feel free to use it.
Committed. pt is now 100% for all D-I levels..:-)
Should I close this
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 08:32:34AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 07:33:40PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Which architectures besides amd64 are failing? I'd like to verify the
fix, but there doesn't seem to be an amd64 emulator
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 07:13:50PM +0100, peter green [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
tags 488132 +patch
thanks
DO NOT SEND THIS MESSAGE YET
I'd like to verify the
fix, but there doesn't seem to be an amd64 emulator in the archive...
I have added int casts to all the printf calls
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:06:14PM +0200, Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On 2008-06-27 21:58 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
the new iceweasel is not installed using safe-upgrade and is “kept
back”. apt-get is doing the same. I think, when I set up the system, I
installed
Package: qemu
Version: 0.9.1-5
Severity: minor
I was recently looking for an emulator and ruled out qemu based on the
following definitive-sounding statement in the package description:
QEMU is a fast processor emulator: currently the package supports
arm, powerpc, sparc and x86
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:24:58AM +0200, Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.11.4-1, 0.4.11.6-1
With today's updates, sid's wengophone requires libgnutls26 (=
2.4.0-0), not satisfied by lenny, but by unstable (2.4.0-2) and
experimental (2.4.0-1),
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 06:53:22PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.11.6-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on some arches with the following
error:
cmdline_resolver.cc:239: error: format '%d' expects type
Which architectures besides amd64 are failing? I'd like to verify the
fix, but there doesn't seem to be an amd64 emulator in the archive...
and it looks like everything else succeeded.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 05:16:05AM +0800, Telemachus [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On the command line, I can no longer remove a package but keep one of the
auto-installed dependencies. I could swear that I used to be able to do this:
aptitude purge mpd libshout3+
I thought this
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 08:35:37PM +0700, Oleg Atamanenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Is there any progress on the issue?
Should I provide some extra information, etc?
Can you provide some information on how to find what is the cause of the
issue?
Well, I meant to reassign this
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 10:01:06AM -0700, Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 09:14:30PM -0700, Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
While it was a good guess, I don't think this is an aptitude bug.
I've tracked down the problem
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 06:48:02PM -0600, Neil Mayhew [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
The output of apt-cache depends --recursive doesn't look anything like
the output of apt-rdepends. For example, apt-cache says that rpm is a
dependency of libgtkhtml3.14-19. That's definitely bogus!
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 09:14:30PM -0700, Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
While it was a good guess, I don't think this is an aptitude bug.
I've tracked down the problem. apt recodes Descriptions to the local
codeset when client code invokes LongDesc(). However, it just
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 03:22:05AM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
I can see this bug too, using the ncurses interface (the first red line):
http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/447290.png
This isn't the same thing, since it occurs in a completely different
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 01:46:28PM +0200, Noel David Torres Taño [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
El Thursday 19 June 2008 15:51:55 Daniel Burrows escribió:
When you're upgrading packages, only *new* recommendations should be
installed. So I was looking for a package where version N
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 08:09:07PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 487230 aptitude
Bug#487230: kimiwitu: description trimmed
Bug reassigned from package `kimwitu' to `aptitude'.
thanks
Stopping
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 08:44:02AM +0200, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
Hi Daniel,
On Thursday 19 June 2008, you wrote:
Hm, I've been trying to avoid changing strings since April. Which
strings got fuzzied by accident? (I'd like to avoid doing the same
thing again)
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 06:12:36AM +0200, Noel David Torres Taño [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
El Thursday 19 June 2008 04:38:25 Daniel Burrows escribió:
I need the *specific* package that should be triggering the fam
installation (again assuming you mean fam). i.e., which package
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:01:27PM +0200, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On Wednesday 18 June 2008, I wrote:
I thought my PO file was based on a post-lenny string freeze
situation, but apparently not. I'll see if I can get at least get rid
of the fuzzies.
Here's an
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 06:30:23PM +0200, Noel David Torres Taño [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
El Wednesday 18 June 2008 04:48:08 Daniel Burrows escribió:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 01:24:08AM +0200, Noel David Torres Taño
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
I still happens
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 05:27:12PM +0300, Teemu Likonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
But I haven't configured aptitude to install recommended packages
automatically. This is what reads in the settings:
Hm, what are the contents of /etc/apt/apt.conf and ~/.aptitude/config?
Daniel
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 01:24:08AM +0200, Noel David Torres Taño [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
I still happens:
Which recommendation isn't being fulfilled? (i.e., I need the package
you installed or upgraded, the version or versions involved, and the
recommendation that needs to be
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:08:33PM +, brian m. carlson [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
When I tried to upgrade my system today, the new ncurses-base depends on
a newer version of libncurses5 than is in unstable (on amd64). As a
consequence, the dependency resolver offers to keep
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 04:30:53PM +0300, Teemu Likonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
Daniel Burrows wrote (2008-06-17 06:03 -0700):
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 05:27:12PM +0300, Teemu Likonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
But I haven't configured aptitude to install recommended
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 04:16:54AM +, brian m. carlson [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
I used the GUI interface, and the bug exhibited itself as part of an
upgrade. When I type ! to accept the solution of removing ncurses-bin,
no warning window pops up, and if I hit g twice, it will
So, this is interesting. In addition to the original bug report, it
appears that even the somewhat weak attempt aptitude currently makes to
exclude the removal of Essential packages doesn't trip for apt itself.
There's a separate flag from Essential, Flag::Important, that is
apparently set on
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 08:09:44AM +, Teemu Likonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
Aptitude does not remove automatically installed packages with aptitude
remove. Files are marked as automatically installed, though. It tried
exactly the same thing in Etch and Sid:
$ sudo aptitude
package aptitude
reassign 486044 dpkg
thanks
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:21:23AM +0700, Oleg Atamanenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Some time ago I noticed, that updating of the packages is very-very slow. E.g
updating of openoffice from 2.4.0-6 to 2.4.1-1 taked about 5 hours. The
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 01:34:54PM +1000, Tim Connors [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
I'm wondering whether this is a dpkg bug. Should it be assigned
accordingly?
The bug Yann reported sounds like it is, but that's not the original
report -- the original report appears to be that
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 12:17:31PM -0400, Felipe Sateler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.11.4-1
Followup-For: Bug #477038
The information given by aptitude now is much more cryptic and confusing:
% aptitude search laptop-mode-tools
i
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:50:31PM +0530, shirish [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard
to say:
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi all,
The aptitude package has two options. One is either using the aptitude
GUI or the aptitude CLI.
In the aptitude GUI one can see and resolve,purge
, I'm not
sure there's a way to fix this other than waiting for someone to
backport aptitude for you or waiting for the lenny release.
Daniel
changeset: 655:1bbaf4b2801e
user:Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
date:Sun May 20 20:10:33 2007 +
summary: [aptitude @ Don't assert
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 06:47:23PM -0500, Don Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
Upon entering aptitude, before any actions are taken, the following is
seen in the syslog:
May 4 17:25:37 turbo aptitude: *** info
May 4 17:25:37 turbo aptitude: /dev/gpmctl: No such file or directory
Package: compiz-gtk
Version: 0.7.6-2
Severity: serious
I saw this while upgrading today:
Preparing to replace compiz-gtk 0.7.4-1 (using .../compiz-gtk_0.7.6-2_i386.deb)
...
Unpacking replacement compiz-gtk ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/compiz-gtk_0.7.6-2_i386.deb
Could you run aptitude-create-state-bundle aptitude-state-bundle.tar.bz2
and post the output somewhere that I can get to it?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 09:27:18PM -0300, Renato S. Yamane [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
merge 472625 483620
thanks
These are not the same bug. As I wrote in the last mail, the problem
is that the install command for the aptitude-defaults file was written
aptitude-defaults.??, so this
Package: acpi
Version: 0.09-6
Severity: normal
acpi dies with a floating point exception on my computer:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ acpi
Floating point exception
Running it in gdb reveals that it's dividing by zero at line 121 of
acpi.c:
(gdb) run
Starting program: /tmp/acpi-0.09/acpi
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 08:11:16AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008, Daniel Burrows wrote:
It looks like the problem is a bug in the new code to fix
conflicts/provides/replaces. This tries to force the resolver to
resolve conflicts between
I've committed the obvious patch for this bug to the Mercurial
repository for the Debian packaging.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:07:57PM +0400, Матяшов Андрей [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
In Debian-testing(Lenny) a bug in aptitude was found. It isn't
working. Other package managers (apt-get, kpackage, synaptic, etc.)
working normally. Screenshot of error is in attach.
You didn't use
It looks like the problem is a bug in the new code to fix
conflicts/provides/replaces. This tries to force the resolver to
resolve conflicts between a package and its replacement in favor of the
replacement by giving a rather large bonus to the score of solutions
that do so. You can verify
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:50:47PM +0200, Witold Baryluk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
29 aktualizowanych, 0 nowo instalowanych, 0 usuwanych i 8nieaktualizowanych.
Failed to exec method /usr/lib/apt/methods/
E: Method has died unexpectedly!
E: Metoda /usr/lib/apt/methods/ nie
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 09:10:17PM -0300, André Luís Lopes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
The error messages are obviously beind displayed in Brazilian
Portuguese and could be translated to something like :
E: Opening configuration file
/usr/share/aptitude/aptitude-defaults.pt_BR -
Package: uqm
Version: 0.6.2.dfsg-6
Severity: wishlist
I have a widescreen LCD monitor (the native resolution is 1280x768...I
don't have the actual aspect ratio handy, but I bet it's 4:3, same as
the widescreen TVs they're selling now).
If I run uqm in full-screen mode, it uses the wrong
Package: xmlto
Version: 0.0.20-1
Severity: normal
I was just experimenting with using xmlto on the aptitude documentation.
I didn't get very far.
aptitude's documentation is split into a manpage and the main body of
the docs. (this is for the convenience of translators -- they can just
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:49:30PM -0700, Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
I consider this pretty serious misbehavior, since it results in
aptitude taking action without a request to take action. However,
this only happens in peculiar circumstances, namely an X failure
killed
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 06:25:50AM -0700, Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
tty.write('apt-listchanges: ' + _('Do you want to continue? [Y/n]? '))
tty.flush()
response = tty.readline()
return response == '\n' or
re.search(locale.nl_langinfo
Interesting.
I can confirm that if I close the terminal where apt-listchanges is
waiting for a prompt, aptitude proceeds to start installing packages.
But this doesn't happen if I send EOF manually (by typing ^D) so
something is happening that involves the terminal. Also, even though
Package: spamassassin
Version: 3.2.4-1
Severity: wishlist
When I logged in this morning, I discovered a bunch of messages like
this in my logs:
May 20 06:00:20 jeeves spamd[29091]: plugin: eval failed: Can't locate
unicore/Canonical.pl in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/share/perl5 /etc/perl
Getting changelogs from the command-line seems to be fairly broken in
the current release of aptitude. It should be fixed by the next release.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As you said, this is probably a planet bug, and it looks to me like
the planet package is the appropriate codebase. I'll reassign it
over there and see whether the maintainer has any helpful suggestions.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 07:41:17PM +0200, Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
No progress on this bug in the last year, and I just couldn't stand this
Couldn't fetch URL... any more. While I'm not familiar enough with
the aptitude source (nor with C++, for that matter) to
Package: ikiwiki
Version: 2.46
Severity: normal
I don't know if this is ikiwiki's fault or the planet's fault.
It's been pointed out to me that when I edit my blog posts, they
appear again on planet.debian.org as if they were new. The creation
date isn't changed: I use [[!meta date=...]] to
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:03:28AM +0200, Javier Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Now http://packages.debian.org/changelogs seems too slow (this morning it
seemed down), but I don't understand this issue:
aptitude changelog emacs
Err ChangeLog of emacs
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:51:04AM -0400, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
Daniel Burrows wrote:
I don't know if this is ikiwiki's fault or the planet's fault.
It's been pointed out to me that when I edit my blog posts, they
appear again on planet.debian.org
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:49:02AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
cp ./build/scripts/dselect/* debian/apt/usr/lib/dpkg/methods/apt/
cp -r ./build/locale debian/apt/usr/share/
cp debian/bugscript debian/apt/usr/share/bug/apt/script
cp debian/apt.logrotate
There's a bug (#478116) in this patch I wrote last year. I sent the
patch directly to Michael, but I'm resending to deity@ so Otavio can
follow this too. The full context follows:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 04:58:40PM -0700, Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
So I've been
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 04:56:05PM -0300, Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:39:56PM -0300, Otavio Salvador [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
I guess we
These bugs should be fixed by apt 0.7.12, which I've just uploaded to
the archive. Once it migrates to testing I'll close them.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 07:17:03PM -0300, Fabricio Alcalde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.4-4
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n
When I switch to root the charset is changed by another one, where the
characters do not display correctly. I have some
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 06:16:33PM +0400, Sergey Burladyan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
seb:~# aptitude update
E: Line 50 too long (max 1024)
E: Method http has died unexpectedly!
E: Method http has died unexpectedly!
E: Method http has died unexpectedly!
E: Method http has died
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 09:09:15PM +0200, Charles-Francois Natali [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
It's probably due to
aptitude (0.4.11.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
- Use a different technique to migrate Recommends-Important to
Install-Recommends that doesn't overwrite the
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:21:39AM +0200, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Le jeudi 24 avril 2008 à 00:48 +0100, Tom Parker a écrit :
Installed from Etch 4.0r2 DVDs a little while back. Using a mix of
stable,testing,unstable and experimental packages. Been upgrading with
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 07:16:48AM -0700, Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Obviously the prompt should happen up-front, but it's not the case
that aptitude will happily remove mktemp without a prompt.
...of course, I mean not the case in my tests. I don't see in the
code
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 02:56:36PM +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
Any idea how to debug this further?
Could you install the current unstable version (0.4.11.2-1) and see if
it fixes this problem?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:12:57AM +0200, Stefan Klinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.10-1+b2
Thanks for your detailed bug report. Do you see this bug if you
install the version of aptitude and cwidget in unstable? It looks like
a duplicate of #461342
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 08:32:01AM +0200, Erwan David [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
I have choosen in aptitude option not to automatically install
recommended packages. However, aptitude wants to install recommended
packages as dependencies when upgrading a package,
Do you get this
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:57:15PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
Daniel Burrows wrote:
This is expected behavior. When why is run with only a target, it
tries to find the package that's keeping the automatically installed
target on the system
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 03:59:26PM +0200, Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
Some time ago, python-elementtree was pulled in as a recommendation of
translate-toolkit. The situation is as this:
,
| $ aptitude show python-elementtree | grep ^Auto
| Automatically installed:
package aptitude
retitle 476951 There should be a way to invoke apt-listbugs before downloading
packages.
reassign 476951 apt-listbugs,apt
thanks
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 12:51:46PM -0500, Luca Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
Currently aptitude first downloads packages then check for
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:38:03PM +0200, Wolfgang Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On 2008-04-18 Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please quote the section of the manpage that explains this?
| SYNOPSIS
|aptitude [options...] {autoclean | clean | forget
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 11:38:22AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
Neither do I. Aptitude must do something wrong here.
aptitude tries to be quieter (in particular, to not emit control
characters) when its output isn't a tty:
if(quiet == 0 !isatty(1))
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:52:40PM +0200, Wolfgang Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On 2008-04-18 Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The command save-upgrade is explained in the man page but does not
exist:
| greg:~# aptitude save-upgrade
Oops, just noticed a typo
Thanks for the patch. Unfortunately aptitude is in a string freeze
right now, so I can't apply it (it'll break all the other translations).
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 01:20:23PM +0200, Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
My unstable chroot still has an obsolete libdb2 installed, although it
is marked automatic and has no revdeps. It even does not break
anything when I select it explicitely for purge.
The problem is
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 06:44:44PM +0200, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 08:20:29AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 11:38:22AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Neither do I. Aptitude must do something
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 07:03:49PM +0200, Jens Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 08:27:11AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Thanks for the patch. Unfortunately aptitude is in a string freeze
right now, so I can't apply it (it'll break all the other
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 06:50:37PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.11.2-1
Severity: normal
The 'why' command doesn't work when package is automatically installed.
You mean *not* automatically installed, right?
This is
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 07:40:10PM -0500, Luca Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 08:01:57 -0700
Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
apt-listbugs is invoked because it's listed in Dpkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs.
This is the hook for commands that are invoked just
BTW, I wanted to thank you for all the reports you're filing on
aptitude. For various reasons I'm not working on it as much this month,
but having this stuff stored in the BTS is good so that I have a list of
things to work on when I do have time to spend.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 07:24:48PM +0200, Wolfgang Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
The command upgrade is undocumented in the man page and gives a warning,
works fine otherwise:
| greg:~# aptitude upgrade
| W: The upgrade command is deprecated; use safe-upgrade instead.
|
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 01:20:52PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
Judging from aptitude's manpage I would have expected 'aptitude
safe-upgrade' to upgrade everything it can in a single run.
However, it needed multiple runs. At first run it upgraded a lot of
packages ( 250).
Daniel Burrows\.
.PP
This manual page is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any
later version\.
.PP
This manual page
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:39:56PM -0300, Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
I guess we have enough changes for a new release. Please give it a
test and upload :-)
A whole pile of files change when I run dpkg-buildpackage. Is that
expected? Should I just check them in?
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 04:32:54PM +0200, Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On 2008-02-24 14:32 +0100, Michel BRIAND wrote:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.10-1+b2
Severity: minor
I'm using aptitude with sudo and I always get those messages
with aptitude is running
401 - 500 of 1580 matches
Mail list logo
