Bug#1052561: bookworm-pu: package nfdump/1.7.3-1 (pre-discussion)

2024-04-07 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On 08/10/23 10:19 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: Hi, > > On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 09:36:00PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > > [ Other info ] > > > I did not attach the debdiff because it would be too large and only > > > consist > > > of upstream changes. No changes to debian/ (except dropping

Bug#1052561: bookworm-pu: package nfdump/1.7.3-1 (pre-discussion)

2023-10-08 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Am 07.10.23 um 13:14 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: Hi, On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 09:36:00PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: [ Other info ] I did not attach the debdiff because it would be too large and only consist of upstream changes. No changes to debian/ (except dropping a backported fix

Bug#1052561: bookworm-pu: package nfdump/1.7.3-1 (pre-discussion)

2023-10-07 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi, On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 09:36:00PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > [ Other info ] > I did not attach the debdiff because it would be too large and only consist > of upstream changes. No changes to debian/ (except dropping a backported fix > already in 12.1) are

Bug#1052561: bookworm-pu: package nfdump/1.7.3-1 (pre-discussion)

2023-09-24 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: nfd...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:nfdump [ Reason ] I am proposing updating updating the nfdump package to a new _upstream_ release in bookworm.