On 19.01.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
But the segfault should be investigated; I'm unsure whether I just
should reassign to perl - what do others think?
Well, the perl package got recently a few bugs telling that it
segfaults. Is at all clear, exactly where in the
Hi Meik, hi Joshua,
Meik Hellmund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why was the texdocrc file missing in the first place? Is it only installed if
perl-tk is already present?
No, it's a bug in our postinst scripts. The file is under ucf control
instead of dpkg's, because we have taken it over from the
just my experience:
- I had tetex-* installed, but not perl-tk
- tried texdoctk and it told me to install perl-tk
- installed texdoctk and it failed with Couldn't open system-wide default
config file texdocrc
- found this bug and did
cp /usr/share/tetex-base/texdocrc /etc/texdoctk/
- now
Joshua Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 03:01:29PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Joshua Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried running dpkg -i --force-confmiss on the tetex-doc file in
/var/cache/apt/archives and that still doesn't make it work.
Sorry, my fault. First
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 09:12:17AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
But it's much easier: simply copy /usr/share/tetex-base/texdocrc to
/etc/texdoctk/texdocrc.
Unfortunately that doesn't seem to work either. I installed it from the
We don't understand each other. The message is still
Joshua Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And, most importantly, what's the output of
dpkg -l perl perl-tk
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 06:53:43PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
So the part with the missing file is nearly clear - at least I cannot
imagine how tetex could be responsible for it being deleted. But the
segfault should be investigated; I'm unsure whether I just should
reassign to perl - what
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 15:25 -0500, Joshua Lee wrote:
This is really not an answer to that question, but perl-tk wasn't a
required dependency of tetex-doc in sid. I added it to the apt-get line
when I first got tetex-doc anyway - I figured I'd want it.
Why should tetex-doc depend on perl-tk?
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 03:10:42PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Joshua Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 3.0-11
Severity: important
texdoctk says Couldn't open system-wide default config file texdocrc.
then has a segmentation fault.
If a perl script fails
Joshua Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I speculate that there is no file /etc/texdoctk/texdocrc. Since this
file is a conffile, removing and reinstalling won't restore it; instead
you need to purge and reinstall.
apt-get remove --purge tetex-doc
Removing tetex-doc ...
mktexlsr: Updating
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 02:00:36PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
tetex-doc
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Sorry, that bug was just reported yesterday, it's fixed
Hi Joshua, hi Perl(-tk) maintainers,
Joshua Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 03:10:42PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Joshua Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 3.0-11
Severity: important
texdoctk says Couldn't open system-wide default config
Joshua Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 02:00:36PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
tetex-doc
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Sorry, that bug was
Frank K�ster wrote:
Hi Joshua, hi Perl(-tk) maintainers,
Joshua Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 03:10:42PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Joshua Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 3.0-11
Severity: important
texdoctk says Couldn't
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 03:01:29PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Joshua Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried running dpkg -i --force-confmiss on the tetex-doc file in
/var/cache/apt/archives and that still doesn't make it work.
Sorry, my fault. First of all, I forgot that we use ucf to
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 3.0-11
Severity: important
texdoctk says Couldn't open system-wide default config file texdocrc.
then has a segmentation fault. I've tried removing then reinstalling,
but that doesn't seem to help.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers
Joshua Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 3.0-11
Severity: important
texdoctk says Couldn't open system-wide default config file texdocrc.
then has a segmentation fault.
If a perl script fails to open a file, it shouldn't give a *segfault*.
Can you please send us
17 matches
Mail list logo
