OK, you win, I will not continue with this. Do whatever you want with the bug.
I'm sending this message to debian-legal, in case other people care.
On 8/30/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For all you've said up to this point, the sound files being used could be in
the public domain;
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 12:00:55PM +0200, Roberto Gordo Saez wrote:
On 8/30/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For all you've said up to this point, the sound files being used could be
in
the public domain; in which case the only controlling copyright is that
governing the
I strongly disagree with your arguments. It looks that we have
opposite way of thinking, so I will not reply to them, it is going to
nowhere. Don't worry, as I said, I won't continue searching for this.
If this is the common feeling here, I think I made a serious mistake
choosing Debian, because
On 8/30/06, Roberto Gordo Saez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I strongly disagree with your arguments. It looks that we have
opposite way of thinking, so I will not reply to them, it is going to
nowhere. Don't worry, as I said, I won't continue searching for this.
When conversations go nowhere, it's
posted mailed
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:32:50PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
In this case, I see one rather obvious issue (there may be others):
Steve Langasek has said, in essence
When A says X, and we have no evidence to the contrary,
we believe A.
Your
Package: chromium-data
Version: 0.9.12-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1
There are no information on where data files came from. Looking at the
web page, upstream claims that music loops and raw sound effects were
taken from http://www.partnersinrhyme.com/ and
severity 385115 important
thanks
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 10:47:40AM +0200, Roberto Gordo Saez wrote:
There are no information on where data files came from. Looking at the
web page, upstream claims that music loops and raw sound effects were
taken from http://www.partnersinrhyme.com/ and
severity 385115 grave
thanks
I'm sorry, but AFAIK, distributing illegal data should be release
critical. We are not talking about non-free data, we are talking about
ripped (or pirated, if you prefer), undistributable data, which is
much worse. Please read below.
On 8/29/06, Steve Langasek
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 10:51:59PM +0200, Roberto Gordo Saez wrote:
I'm sorry, but AFAIK, distributing illegal data should be release
critical. We are not talking about non-free data, we are talking about
ripped (or pirated, if you prefer), undistributable data, which is
much worse. Please
9 matches
Mail list logo
