On Wed, 9 May 2007 16:46:08 -0600
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 11:01:36PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
I can't see how this can be deemed important - perhaps the automated
tool should be less paranoid. I built, tested and run gpe-timesheet ON
amd64 and have
I can't see how this can be deemed important - perhaps the automated
tool should be less paranoid. I built, tested and run gpe-timesheet ON
amd64 and have done for the entire time it was waiting in NEW.
There is no way that the automated message can claim that this problem :
will cause
your
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 11:01:36PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
I can't see how this can be deemed important - perhaps the automated
tool should be less paranoid. I built, tested and run gpe-timesheet ON
amd64 and have done for the entire time it was waiting in NEW.
There is no way that the
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 11:01:36PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
I can't see how this can be deemed important - perhaps the automated
tool should be less paranoid. I built, tested and run gpe-timesheet ON
amd64 and have done for the entire time it was waiting in NEW.
There is no way that the
4 matches
Mail list logo